Because the garage owner is lending out my car. With fractional reserve he's lending out 10 of my cars and is in a constant state of insolvency even though it isn't exposed until everyone wants their car back.
I'm not saying they have to pay you but if one bank does and the other one charges you to garage your money, the first bank will attract more capital. Not that bank 1 would have kept pace with inflation but little has.
Anyway do you interpret the bailout and industry wide promise to forgive bond liabilities to amount to further socializatuon of the financial system? How much more raping of the tax base is possible before people ask why they're going to work?
The garage owner is not lending out your car. He is storing it.
But you are correct that the main issue is fractional reserve banking. It creates a perpetually unstable system that requires a government backstop.
These arguments also assume that inflation is the normal course of action when in an honest system money should be getting more valuable with increases in productivity. Everything is ass backwards.
Regarding Bailouts, the system is so hopelessly intervened the only solution is more and more interventions. Eventually, the whole thing collapses under its own weight. In other words, the patient is too far gone.