any real evidence to prove that?
The video implies that strength trained armed forces are more difficult to kill than non-strength trained armed forces soldiers.
Is this accurate? In all branches, or just certain ones?
I'd imagine, with all the data, that there's at least some type of meta regression to prove this statement out one way or the other.
Qualitatively, I want to think it's true. But in combat, so many things are critical to survival. Is strength training really one of them? Or does strength training pale in comparison to other factors:
Phyisical:
Joint integrity
Reaction time
Heart rate
Vo2Max
endurance
alactic ability
Emotional:
Resilience
lack of empathy (or reverse)
tinkering (do you enjoy taking things apart)
Mental:
Intelligence
Analytical prowess
competitiveness
Sociological:
Relational (can you join with others)
subservience (can you follow orders)