These are the kinds of discussions I had as a kid on the playground. You communicate like you are trapped in adolescence. Except you have Google so it allows you to plug in various words that nobody in real life actually use when they communicate.
If you want to have a discussion, then ask an intelligent question. Asking a hypothetical that includes "everything the left says he is" is ignorant. If you want to have a logical, fact-based discussion, we can talk about a specific case, like the one I was commenting on (the "34 felonies"). Or the "rape" case. I'm willing to help you try and understand the facts and why the lawfare was wrong, but you have to be willing to have an adult conversation.
Lol.
You again did not answer my question, what are you an expert in? anything? are you a professional in any capacity?
You were having hypothetical questions on the axiological and deontological status of humankinds actions and motives on the playground? LMAO, ok bro. You think awfully highly of yourself.
I love that you think I use google, AI etc... I will give you a hint, it's called reading and having and entelechy. I know more about your religion than you do and I am not even a christian lol. That must hurt.
How can one have a discussion if you can't even agree on the facts. You, from your posts in said thread, appear to believe that this gerrymandering drama is the democrats fault. The etiology of this whole thing is Trumps insistence on being entitled to votes, to which a reciprocation was enacted.
Trump has been found liable for fraud before, he is a fraudster. You are an apologist for him, which is fitting as you follow an exoteric understanding of your religious dogma which makes you a cult follower.
I will take it easy on you from here on out, you aren't equipped cognitively and are frankly, uninteresting.