IMO Phil heath is the next kevin levrone.
In 92 he was teh second coming. Won the NOC i think, and took 2nd at the O. He had shape and lines which were unheard of, and he had wider clavicles than heath has.
But what happened to kev? Once he grew into his frame and filled out - once he put on 'pro quality mass', he looked the same as everyone else, his weaknesses became more glaring, and while he took second 4 times at the O, he was never the 6-time champ his genetics could have allowed.
When guys blow up, they don't look as good. The place higher in this weird IFBB judging system (heath and darrem would never beat DJ at the O, but they handled him quickly at the NY Pro), but they don't look good anymore.
Imagine if Phil heath DIDN'T spend the next 15 months adding pro levels of mass. imagine if Phil Heath DIDN'T put on 15 pounds, show up with bigger elbows and jawbone. With a more bunched up chest, and thicker arms and legs to further destroy the illusion of width.
I remember being clowned when I said Phil should take off the O and milk the 'undefeated' thing. Then, he did it. I hope he' listening now. Phil, put on 5 pounds, not 25. Show up in 15 months with muscle maturity on the same frame, not hanging slabs with no shape, a crying need for escaline due to weaknesses being shown, and a chest more bunched up than it is now.