Author Topic: Tested for AIDS  (Read 4785 times)

Camel Jockey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16711
  • Mel Gibson and Bob Sly World Domination
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #25 on: September 22, 2006, 12:26:00 PM »
I heard just today that smokers are far more vulnerable to the virus than non smokers

btw

it is virtually impossible for a man to contract hiv from a woman during intercourse

So if you smoke you're more likely to fuck some nasty whore?  ::)

Deedee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5067
  • They sicken of the calm, who knew the storm.
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #26 on: September 22, 2006, 03:03:53 PM »
women can get it from men (any trauma to vaginal/anal tissues increases their risk) . . . but they can't really give it to men . . . unless there was already an open sore or something of that nature on the penis.

what an excellent image... :-X

Al-Gebra

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5927
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #27 on: September 22, 2006, 03:06:51 PM »
what an excellent image... :-X

hey, I thought we were being scientific.  ;D

Deedee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5067
  • They sicken of the calm, who knew the storm.
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #28 on: September 22, 2006, 03:17:07 PM »
So basically, the rule of thumb for women is, if planning to have unprotected sex with a new man in Sub-saharan Africa, it's important to examine his peepee for bleeding, ulcerous, cankerous wounds first. Got it.  :P

knny187

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22005
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #29 on: September 22, 2006, 03:26:33 PM »
So basically, the rule of thumb for women is, if planning to have unprotected sex with a new man in Sub-saharan Africa, it's important to examine his peepee for bleeding, ulcerous, cankerous wounds first. Got it.  :P

then guys like Bezerker will have a very...very small examination

 ;)

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 30721
  • Mentzer is Alive
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #30 on: September 22, 2006, 04:40:09 PM »
raw anal sex = horrible urinary tract infection

jaejonna

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14944
  • Head Asian of Getbig
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #31 on: September 22, 2006, 05:11:30 PM »
On Howard Stern, Gary Garber (some reporter that ask ass hole questions to stars on the red carpet) 
.. Asked the famous Bishop Desmond Tuti outside some place in NYC. He was like "Desmond tuti do you like unprotective sex ?" And he replied, " I always say to my people practice the ABC's ...Abstience...IF you can not abstain, ..BE....Be Faithful and if you cant be faithful...C ...Condomize!"
L

Dos Equis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 64062
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #32 on: October 17, 2006, 12:57:16 AM »
Okay.  Got the Tony Brown book.  Published in 1995.  I was wrong about it not being a heterosexual disease.  He posits that in the U.S. it is primarily spread through IV drug use and those who come into contact with people involved with IV drug users.  Here are some excerpts from "Black Lies, White Lies" (kinda long):

"It has become abundantly clear, in spite of a great campaign of disinformation and reprehensible scare tactics, that 'AIDS' does not attack the general population.  After fifteen years, it remains almost exclusively confined to IV-drug users (about 32 percent of the cases) and a subset of male homosexuals which accounted for about 60 percent of the total 140, 428 AIDS cases in the United States in 1991.  The total number of homosexuals who have had 'AIDS' since it was discovered in 1981 was 217,012 as of December 1993."

"About 95 percent of those contract 'AIDS' have a history of drug use--according to Dr. Robert E. Willner in his book Deadly Deception.  Willner quotes studies that claim it takes from '500 to 1,000 unprotected sexual encounters to transmit' HIV . . . ."

"The odds of a healthy non-drug-using heterosexual getting 'AIDS' are the same as for getting hit by lightening.  And from a population of 255 million Americans, only 140, 428 were living with 'AIDS' as of 1994.
John Lauritsen and Hank Wilson, in their book Death Rush, accuse the CDC of fraud:  'The effect of the CDC's statistical trickery is to underreport IV-drug users as an AIDS group by at least 50 percent; the effect is to construe AIDS as a venereal disease, rather than a drug-induced condition."

One of the world's leading authorities on viruses and retroviruses, Dr. Peter Duesberg, "blames the rise of 'AIDS on the 'massive escalation in the consumption of recreational drugs' in the 1960s and 1970s.  In a ten-year period alone, Americans increased their use of cocaine by 200 percent, while the use of amphetamines and poppers skyrocketed among homosexuals.  Drug abuse, Duesberg says, resulted in the reemergence of old diseases such as tuberculosis--one of the 'AIDS' diseases--in the 1980s and 1990s."

"Duesberg's theory of how 'AIDS' spreads is simple to follow.  He holds that 'AIDS' begins in those who are biologically most susceptible:  people whose lifestyles make them perfect hosts for a 'benign' retrovirus (HIV).  He says it that HIV hardly ever becomes active even in 'AIDS.'  These 'thirdworldized' hosts, all of whom have ravaged their body in some way, include heterosexual drug addicts; and those drug-abusing homosexuals whose irresponsible 'bathhouse' sex behavior exposes them to lethal microbes and the spread of infections."

Dos Equis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 64062
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #33 on: October 17, 2006, 01:53:53 AM »
More:

"Michael Callen, one of the founders of the People with AIDS Coalition, lived twelve years with 'AIDS.'  Just before his death, he offered a compelling confession in HEAL, a publication for alternative health therapies, that lends credence to Duesberg's 'DAIDS' theory [Drug Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome]:

By the age of 27, I estimate I had 3,000 different sex partners.  I'd also had:  hepatitis A, hepatitis B, hepatitis non-A, non-B; herpes simplex types 1 and 2; shigella; entamoeba histolytica; Giardia; syphilis; gonorrhea; nonspecific urethritis; chlamydia; venereal warts; CMV; EBV reactivations; and finally cryptosporidiosis and AIDS.  The question for me wasn't why I was sick with AIDS but rather how I had been able to remain standing on two feet for so long.  If you blanked out my name and handed my medical chart, prior to AIDS, to a doctor, she/he might reasonable have guessed that it was the chart of a 65-year-old equatorial African living in squalor.

"Callen very likely put his finger on what is the probable link between the 'AIDS' outbreak among high-risk groups in the West and the malnourished heterosexual population in Africa:  a Third World health status.  This sort of ravaged immune system first developed in the West among a bathhouse culture of male bisexuals and homosexuals, as well as heterosexual injection-drug users and homosexual long-term recreational drug abusers.  These subcultures were extremely vulnerable because of debilitated bodies and a Third World hygiene status."

"`Something other than homosexuality' causes 'AIDS,' says Duesberg.  'Your all-American homosexual neighbor will never get 'AIDS.'  It's only the ones who have hundreds, or thousands, of sexual contacts a year.  And how is that achieved?  Almost exclusively by chemicals.
"Drug abuse is rampant among homosexuals who practice promiscuous sex.  For multiple orgasms and as an anal relaxant, this bathhouse subculture routinely uses 'poppers' (amyl nitrite inhalants), and their 'recreational' regime consists of PCP, amphetamines, angel dust, cocaine, heroin, uppers and downers, Valium, and alcohol,' Duesberg explains."

"In my opinion, then, the illness we call 'AIDS' in the United States is not by any means a 'homosexual disease.'  I believe it is precipitated by a chemical injury, but it is also triggered by a variety of microorganisms as cofactors that destroys the body's immune system.  The process is a deadly synergistic combustion.  High-risk 'AIDS' behavior in the West is primarily drug abuse, receptive anal intercourse, poor hygiene, malnutrition, and unprotected sex--especially if there is a history of sexually transmitted diseases." 

There is more, but my fingers are tired.   :)


scubaculture

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 67
  • Getbig!
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #34 on: October 17, 2006, 05:17:15 AM »
The ermmm "natives" here in South Africa think that if you have AIDS you can cure it by sleeping with a virgin.

dan18

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7307
  • I DID WHAT I DID BECAUSE I DO WHAT I WANT.
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #35 on: October 17, 2006, 05:54:12 AM »
unless her HIV positive B/friend his humping your anus at the same time


ta ta
then you should get tested at least once a month :P
p

Lord Humungous

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4673
  • REVOLUTION CALLING!
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #36 on: October 17, 2006, 06:24:55 AM »
anal or vaginal?  I heard somewhere that anal is way easier to catch. Maybe it's jsut for the women's side tho.


Your also 100x more likely to get shit on your dick during anal sex!
X

a_joker10

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1922
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #37 on: October 17, 2006, 08:01:59 AM »
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/dhap.htm

Quote
Yes, it is possible for either partner to become infected with HIV through vaginal sex* (intercourse). In fact, it is the most common way the virus is transmitted in much of the world. HIV can be found in the blood, semen (cum), pre-seminal fluid (pre-cum) or vaginal fluid of a person infected with the virus.

Google is your friend.

Z

Clubber Lang

  • Time Out
  • Getbig III
  • *
  • Posts: 916
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #38 on: October 17, 2006, 08:13:27 AM »
the odds of getting hiv from unprotected vaginal sex with an infected woman are 1/500, figure out what % of the female population has aids and youll see your odds are approaching zero

an anal receiver, on the other hand, has a 1/4 chance of getting aids if his unprotected pitcher is carrying

condoms are supposed to reduce transmissons by about 10 fold for vaginal sex ( i dont know if its different for anal)

this is why in canada last i checked 75% of new transmission are still men (though thats down drastically from the ititial infection rates)

Diesel1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6261
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #39 on: October 17, 2006, 08:26:09 AM »
The prodigal son returns  :)

a_joker10

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1922
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #40 on: October 17, 2006, 08:42:56 AM »
the odds of getting hiv from unprotected vaginal sex with an infected woman are 1/500, figure out what % of the female population has aids and youll see your odds are approaching zero

an anal receiver, on the other hand, has a 1/4 chance of getting aids if his unprotected pitcher is carrying

condoms are supposed to reduce transmissons by about 10 fold for vaginal sex ( i dont know if its different for anal)

this is why in canada last i checked 75% of new transmission are still men (though thats down drastically from the ititial infection rates)

Nice to see that you know more about it then Center for Disease Control.
Should I be calling you Dr. Clubber Lang.
Or just Dr. Lang.
Z

Diesel1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6261
Re: Tested for AIDS
« Reply #41 on: October 17, 2006, 08:45:56 AM »
Nice to see that you know more about it then Center for Disease Control.
Should I be calling you Dr. Clubber Lang.
Or just Dr. Lang.

You'll call him sir if you know what's good for you...