Author Topic: Ahmad Haidar is over-rated !!!!!!!!!!! (Read 2863 times)

Stavios · « **on:** February 13, 2007, 08:55:41 PM »

People keeps saying he should be top 3 at the Ironman because he is aesthetic but I think a lot of guys are much bigger and better conditionned and are just as aesthetic as he is

plus his arms are too small

plus his waist looks wide in a lot of poses cause he keeps crunching down his abs in every pose because he fell in the hype of the "abzilla" thing and try to show his midsection as much as he can

discuss

Ozzy · « **Reply #1 on:** February 13, 2007, 09:02:34 PM »

Nah, Haider should have placed much higher in other shows, so under-rated is more accurate.

Stavios · « **Reply #2 on:** February 13, 2007, 09:03:28 PM »

Quote from: Ozzy on February 13, 2007, 09:02:34 PM

Nah, Haider should have placed much higher in other shows, so under-rated is more accurate.

how so. what does he have that makes him stand out ?

anabolicfreak · « **Reply #3 on:** February 13, 2007, 11:13:56 PM »

Haider is like a guy from the 80s or so.I mean physiquewise.Nowadays there are men who are bigger yet just as aesthetically pleasing as him which is why he is not one of the top pros.Melvin,dexter and darrem are just as symmetrical but also bigger

Ozzy · « **Reply #4 on:** February 13, 2007, 11:32:21 PM »

Exactly. He's more complete than other guys, without the GH gut.

TestDummy · « **Reply #5 on:** February 13, 2007, 11:55:56 PM »

anyone have any pics?

Cleanest Natural · « **Reply #6 on:** February 14, 2007, 03:15:58 AM »

Quote from: Stavios on February 13, 2007, 08:55:41 PM

People keeps saying he should be top 3 at the Ironman because he is aesthetic but I think a lot of guys are much bigger and better conditionned and are just as aesthetic as he is

plus his arms are too small

plus his waist looks wide in a lot of poses cause he keeps crunching down his abs in every pose because he fell in the hype of the "abzilla" thing and try to show his midsection as much as he can

discuss

I THINK U ARE BLIND..OR JUST PLAIN DELUSIONAL.

GoneAway · « **Reply #7 on:** February 14, 2007, 04:08:23 AM »

I present to you... Ahmad Haidar from the 2005 Toronto Pro.

Looks good to me. Judge for yourselves.

credit Flexonline.com for the pics.

GoneAway · « **Reply #8 on:** February 14, 2007, 04:10:37 AM »

GoneAway · « **Reply #9 on:** February 14, 2007, 04:12:17 AM »

Stavios · « **Reply #10 on:** February 14, 2007, 04:45:59 AM »

ok I agree he looks good there

finurface · « **Reply #11 on:** February 14, 2007, 06:39:22 AM »

he s the kind of guy who relied more on hardcore training than teh juice.

He must be a serious weight lifter who maxed his natural potential before doing some "normal" doses of steroids, and of course he doesnt do GH .

He s like a bodybuilder whoe scaped from the 70'.

GoneAway · « **Reply #12 on:** February 14, 2007, 06:54:26 AM »

Quote from: finurface on February 14, 2007, 06:39:22 AM

he s the kind of guy who relied more on hardcore training than teh juice.

He must be a serious weight lifter who maxed his natural potential before doing some "normal" doses of steroids, and of course he doesnt do GH .

He s like a bodybuilder whoe scaped from the 70'.

It does seem like he's not abusing the drugs, though he's not small either. Kept a nice waist, but could nail his conditioning more than in the pics. If he does, I feel he'll place a bit better at the bigger shows.

Royalty · « **Reply #13 on:** February 14, 2007, 07:10:35 AM »

I think he could look even better if he had bigger delts, thicker arms, and a wider back (but what bodybuilder wouldnt)

affy · « **Reply #14 on:** February 14, 2007, 07:13:12 AM »

if he had a bigger back...he would be top 5 olympia material

El Diablo Blanco · « **Reply #15 on:** February 14, 2007, 07:15:18 AM »

HE just doesn't get that detail that can push him over the top. He is definitly not over-rated. IF he was, he would have won a show or two by now.

tweeter · « **Reply #16 on:** February 14, 2007, 07:16:43 AM »

He definately looks good, but I don't think he is as aesthetic as people say he is. His abs are obviously really good and this makes people automatically think "aesthetic". However, his waist is a little wide and some of his bodyparts are a little behind others. That being said, I think his kind of physique is the type that should be placing towards the front of shows, but I believe there are many guys that are more aesthetic and balanced (ex: Ronnie Rockel).

MikeThaMachine · « **Reply #17 on:** February 14, 2007, 11:05:10 AM »

Check out this thread for more awesome pics of Haider the most underated BBer of this generation.

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=91152.0

dzulboy · « **Reply #18 on:** February 14, 2007, 12:06:43 PM »

ronnie rockel kills him

SLYY · « **Reply #19 on:** February 14, 2007, 12:11:56 PM »

Haidar looks great...he has the look I would like to obtain.....

SWOLETRAIN · « **Reply #20 on:** February 14, 2007, 01:18:23 PM »

the thing i dont like about haidar is that he never changes. He always looks the same!!! He will not crack top five. Its gonna be good guys. Toney Dave H, and Eryk bui are going to own that show!!!

DK II · « **Reply #21 on:** February 14, 2007, 01:20:51 PM »

Quote from: SWOLETRAIN on February 14, 2007, 01:18:23 PM

the thing i dont like about haidar is that he never changes. He always looks the same!!! He will not crack top five. Its gonna be good guys. Toney Dave H, and Eryk bui are going to own that show!!!

True.

He looks the same sine 2003.

He never looks bad, but he also never has that Whow! effect.

saucetradomous · « **Reply #22 on:** February 14, 2007, 01:29:42 PM »

After looking at that "ripped thread" you can really see how smooth he is... where's the striations in his quads atleast?

Jr. Franco · « **Reply #23 on:** February 14, 2007, 01:44:54 PM »

i personally think the guy looks wicked, not to bulky/blocky at all

Author Topic: Ahmad Haidar is over-rated !!!!!!!!!!! (Read 2863 times)

Stavios

Stavios

Stavios

affy