Iran ‘to try Britons for espionage’

[240 is Back]

Who said I can't prove it? I'm working, it gets priority over you.

Once again assuming too much... typical CTer

So you possess enough knowledge and evidence to tell me he's lied more - yesterday - and 24 hours later you still haven't shown it.

Then, you call names and use insults.  I just had a simple question. 

[Nordic Superman]

So you possess enough knowledge and evidence to tell me he's lied more - yesterday - and 24 hours later you still haven't shown it.

Then, you call names and use insults.  I just had a simple question. 

I think you need to re-read this thread you delinquent. I said I haven't researched the guy. Neither have YOU, so you can't validate your argument that he HAS lied less than Blair.

I put myself out and said he has lied more because the man is a lunatic. I can take an educated guess with the general knowledge I have of them man to produce the assumption that he has lied more.

A definitive answer would require me to research him, which I don't have the time to do ATM as I am working. How many ways do you want this to be said until your sub 100 IQ cranium realises?

Now get a fucking job you bum, you're a role model for a kid.

[240 is Back]

I think you need to re-read this thread you delinquent. I said I haven't researched the guy. Neither have YOU, so you can't validate your argument that he HAS lied less than Blair.

I put myself out and said he has lied more because the man is a lunatic. I can take an educated guess with the general knowledge I have of them man to produce the assumption that he has lied more.

A definitive answer would require me to research him, which I don't have the time to do ATM as I am working. How many ways do you want this to be said until your sub 100 IQ cranium realises?

Now get a fucking job you bum, you're a role model for a kid.

meltdown.

FYI, I never made the argument that one lied more than the other. I asked a question.  Why did you chime in, if you didn't know the answer? 

[Nordic Superman]

meltdown.

FYI, I never made the argument that one lied more than the other. I asked a question.  Why did you chime in, if you didn't know the answer? 

Wow, this is a politics forum, I would have thought people here, especially someone like you who likes to emit a false aurora of intelligence wouldn't resort to "meltdown" posts.

You didn't just ask a question, you gave support for why you think he has lied less and I gave my reason for why I think he has lied more in my prior post.

And all this arises because you thought you had "won" the discussion when I told you I'm too busy to do research.

[240 is Back]

You didn't just ask a question, you gave support for why you think he has lied less

I did? 

[Nordic Superman]

I did? 

Transparently yes, it's the same old shitty tactics ALL OVER AGAIN...



AND AGAIN...



AND AGAIN...



Rinse and repeat for each topic you have an interest in...

[240 is Back]

Transparently yes, it's the same old shitty tactics ALL OVER AGAIN...

AND AGAIN...

AND AGAIN...

Rinse and repeat for each topic you have an interest in...

Oh, 'transparently'?  Can you quote that?

[Nordic Superman]

Oh, 'transparently'?  Can you quote that?

I could do but it would take a while. Just re-read this thread.

[240 is Back]

I could do but it would take a while. Just re-read this thread.

HAHAHAHAHA - oh, re-read it? 

Please quote where you claimed I "gave support for why you think he has lied less"

You're looking terrible in this thread dude.  You took a position you knew nothing abuot, then attacked the neutral questioner with a claim you couldn't back up. 

[Nordic Superman]

You're looking terrible in this thread dude.  You took a position you knew nothing abuot, then attacked the neutral questioner with a claim you couldn't back up. 

Ad hominem

Unable to refute my position and points.

[240 is Back]

Ad hominem

Unable to refute my position and points.

I asked a simple question:  Who has told more lies?

I have taken no position.  I have asked you to clarify yours.

You have made your point but given zero evidence.

No offense, but I'd rather debate/refute points with someone who does their homework.

Thanks for playing though, and I still await your promise to deliver the evidence you claimed was forthcoming 24 hours ago.

[Nordic Superman]

I asked a simple question:  Who has told more lies?

I have taken no position.  I have asked you to clarify yours.

You have made your point but given zero evidence.

No offense, but I'd rather debate/refute points with someone who does their homework.

Thanks for playing though, and I still await your promise to deliver the evidence you claimed was forthcoming 24 hours ago.

More ad hominem attacks... Unable to refute my posts, just iterating over the standard 240 debating template.

Nice patronising tone too

Seriously, some people have WORK to do.

[24KT]

More ad hominem attacks... Unable to refute my posts, just iterating over the standard 240 debating template.

Nice patronising tone too

Seriously, some people have WORK to do.

Too busy to research it 'cause you have to work... but not too busy to continue posting endlessly.

BS. You made a statement and can't back up your BS. 240 pwned you.

[Nordic Superman]

Too busy to research it 'cause you have to work... but not too busy to continue posting endlessly.

BS. You made a statement and can't back up your BS. 240 pwned you.

I'll get round to it at the weekend, quick posts don't take much of my time.

Aren't you another fool with no education? I bet your degree is in something like hair and beauty

[240 is Back]

I'll get round to it at the weekend, quick posts don't take much of my time.

Aren't you another fool with no education? I bet your degree is in something like hair and beauty

You've embarassed yourself big time here.

[Nordic Superman]

You've embarassed yourself big time here.

Of course I have Mr. Ad hominem

You still haven't replied to this:
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=137866.msg1959096#msg1959096

[240 is Back]

Of course I have Mr. Ad hominem

You still haven't replied to this:
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=137866.msg1959096#msg1959096

You're trying to get readers to leave this topic for another.  It just gets worse and worse for you.

[Nordic Superman]

You're trying to get readers to leave this topic for another.  It just gets worse and worse for you.

Woah, nice back tracking. Can you or can you NOT refute my scenario?

I've told you, at weekend I can do some research.

[240 is Back]

Woah, nice back tracking. Can you or can you NOT refute my scenario?

I've told you, at weekend I can do some research.

I asked you - which nation's leader has lied more.

You told me to go to a 911 thread and argue with you about that topic.

Dude, it's getting sad in here for you.

You said that Ahmedijahad lied more, and I asked for evidence, which you have not yet provided.  I have no position in this argument, other than to call people on stating their opinion without evidence. 

Your opinion has been noted, as has your inability to provide any evidence of this in 48 hours despite your posting here numerous times.  Thanks for your time.

[Nordic Superman]

I asked you - which nation's leader has lied more.

You told me to go to a 911 thread and argue with you about that topic.

Dude, it's getting sad in here for you.

You said that Ahmedijahad lied more, and I asked for evidence, which you have not yet provided.  I have no position in this argument, other than to call people on stating their opinion without evidence. 

Your opinion has been noted, as has your inability to provide any evidence of this in 48 hours despite your posting here numerous times.  Thanks for your time.

More, ad hominem attacks. Seriously brother HOW STUPID are you? Can you not even following my simplistic statements?

The other topic is mutually exclusive and I expected you in all your wisdom of 911 to be able to refute my scenario, however you have not, now onto Ahmadinejad:

Lying about his ideologies (condradictions):
http://www.guardian.co.uk/iran/story/0,,1964075,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=12

Lies about having fully developed nuclear technology:
http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1216
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342489,00.html

Contrast to above:
http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=6410

Some analysis:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/008753.php

Suspect hostage taker (which he denies, therefore if he is an hostage taker he is lying):
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=18663
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2005/9/17/103307.shtml
http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/006882.php
http://www.danielpipes.org/article/4115

After having promised reforms he fills his cabinet with islamic hardliners and more:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4150214.stm
http://www.khaleejtimes.ae/DisplayArticleNew.asp?xfile=data/middleeast/2006/September/middleeast_September105.xml&section=middleeast&col=

[240 is Back]

Lots of liberal sources there

I'd like them from FOX news please.

[240 is Back]

Lots of liberal sources there

I'd like them from FOX news please.

Damn it feels good when the shoe is on the other foot.   

[Nordic Superman]

Damn it feels good when the shoe is on the other foot.   

http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=site%3Afoxnews.com+Ahmadinejad

Just search for topics relating to the ones I've already posted.

[Nordic Superman]

Here's a good one:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161284,00.html