The NeoCTs have arrived!@

[240 is Back]

This new brand of conspiracy theorist is particularly amusing because they believed that all CTs were silly, until they discovered that elections were being held in 2008, and their side might be sitting out for 4 years.

So, they suddenly want to accuse our great leaders of terrible things, as you see below:

What are you getting at Rob? Rumor has it (from very reliable sources) that Bill and Hillarys tempers are ten times worse than McCains.......(hence the 70 + unexplained deaths associated with them during his office).

This particular getbig member has mocked those on here who simply want a full investigation into unexplained events, like those of 9/11.  He has called us crazy.  Yet, he has just made some outright serious accusations, something that most CTers don't do.   See, we're all about facts and evidence.  When buildings fall in a manner which defy the laws of physics, sure, we'd like to have an independent investigation as to why.  But Joe, you use "rumors" to outright ACCUSE a leader of such a terrible thing.

Will this new breed of CTer be as amusing as the last? Time will tell!  One thing to remember that is most interesting... they care more about 70 unexplained deaths than they do 3000.  Just because of what party ruled at the time.  And that, my friends, is sad.

[240 is Back]

Crickets!!!!

[MB_722]

lol

party politics are pathetic

[OzmO]

rotflmao

It's amazing, these tools.

[kh300]

This new brand of conspiracy theorist is particularly amusing because they believed that all CTs were silly, until they discovered that elections were being held in 2008, and their side might be sitting out for 4 years.

So, they suddenly want to accuse our great leaders of terrible things, as you see below:

This particular getbig member has mocked those on here who simply want a full investigation into unexplained events, like those of 9/11.  He has called us crazy.  Yet, he has just made some outright serious accusations, something that most CTers don't do.   See, we're all about facts and evidence.  When buildings fall in a manner which defy the laws of physics, sure, we'd like to have an independent investigation as to why.  But Joe, you use "rumors" to outright ACCUSE a leader of such a terrible thing.

Will this new breed of CTer be as amusing as the last? Time will tell!  One thing to remember that is most interesting... they care more about 70 unexplained deaths than they do 3000.  Just because of what party ruled at the time.  And that, my friends, is sad.

i never understood this one. "the building fell in a way that defied physics". so a building falling from explosives can defy physics, but a building that falls from a plane impact and fires and structure damage cannot?

[OzmO]

i never understood this one. "the building fell in a way that defied physics". so a building falling from explosives can defy physics, but a building that falls from a plane impact and fires and structure damage cannot?

There's nothing to understand.  Nothing defied physics.

[War-Horse]

i never understood this one. "the building fell in a way that defied physics". so a building falling from explosives can defy physics, but a building that falls from a plane impact and fires and structure damage cannot?

The whole thing should not have collapsed in the first place.  Jet fuel heat maybe could have took out a few floors.
Planes have struck buildings before and never has this happened, usually just leaves a hole.

Also have you ever seen building fall in a striaght down pattern before? where did you see this?   Thats right, in an implosion.   Even smaller building not near as top heavy as the trade center, fall sideways at some point.    The odds of all four corners blowing in exact time on each of the floors is impossible........




Now, lets say one corner was mistimed even by a few seconds  (which is what happens in a natural freefall).   Now you have to multiply that late corner by the number of floors to the bottom and between.  This give you the slant of the fall.
This is why implosions are an exact science and require to the second timing in unison.

[Deicide]

The whole thing should not have collapsed in the first place.  Jet fuel heat maybe could have took out a few floors.
Planes have struck buildings before and never has this happened, usually just leaves a hole.

Also have you ever seen building fall in a striaght down pattern before? where did you see this?   Thats right, in an implosion.   Even smaller building not near as top heavy as the trade center, fall sideways at some point.    The odds of all four corners blowing in exact time on each of the floors is impossible........

Children, what is the correct past participle of the verb take?

And what did we learn about number and verb agreement?

[War-Horse]

Children, what is the correct past participle of the verb take?

And what did we learn about number and verb agreement?

WTF dude. I see many more mistakes in grammer and structure than those.















































Thats the point, Bluedotrider, this isnt  a college course, dumbfuck.

[Deicide]

WTF dude. I see many more mistakes in grammer and structure than those.















































Thats the point, Bluedotrider, this isnt  a college course, dumbfuck.

You are right. I did say children; more like 1st grade. You can't even conjugate a common verb of your mother tongue properly. Pathetic.

War Horse's version of take: take/took/took

[War-Horse]

The whole thing should not have collapsed in the first place.  Jet fuel heat maybe could have took out a few floors.
Planes have struck buildings before and never has this happened, usually just leaves a hole.

Also have you ever seen building fall in a striaght down pattern before? where did you see this?   Thats right, in an implosion.   Even smaller building not near as top heavy as the trade center, fall sideways at some point.    The odds of all four corners blowing in exact time on each of the floors is impossible........




Now, lets say one corner was mistimed even by a few seconds  (which is what happens in a natural freefall).   Now you have to multiply that late corner by the number of floors to the bottom and between.  This give you the slant of the fall.
This is why implosions are an exact science and require to the second timing in unison.

[OzmO]

The whole thing should not have collapsed in the first place.  Jet fuel heat maybe could have took out a few floors.
Planes have struck buildings before and never has this happened, usually just leaves a hole.

Also have you ever seen building fall in a striaght down pattern before? where did you see this?   Thats right, in an implosion.   Even smaller building not near as top heavy as the trade center, fall sideways at some point.    The odds of all four corners blowing in exact time on each of the floors is impossible........




Now, lets say one corner was mistimed even by a few seconds  (which is what happens in a natural freefall).   Now you have to multiply that late corner by the number of floors to the bottom and between.  This give you the slant of the fall.
This is why implosions are an exact science and require to the second timing in unison.

wow,  i get so temped and then regret it at some point.  But what the hell...

The whole thing should not have collapsed in the first place.  Jet fuel heat maybe could have took out a few floors.
Planes have struck buildings before and never has this happened, usually just leaves a hole.

how do you qualify "usually"

Also have you ever seen building fall in a striaght down pattern before? where did you see this?

have you ever seen a building NOT fall down in a straight down pattern? 

BTW the first 2 didn't eactly.

Even smaller building not near as top heavy as the trade center, fall sideways at some point.

All look as though they fell straight down to me.  But in the cloud of dust, they could have tilted a bit.

One thing you should remember.  The idea they should fall sideways comes from playing with blocks.  Ever see buildings that fell from an earth quake?  they fall fairly straight down also.  they don't fall like a lego tower and land on it's side.

  The odds of all four corners blowing in exact time on each of the floors is impossible........

All four corners likely didn't at the exact time.  but becuase the building is huge and the dust cloud was huge, it's easy for the untrained eye, uneducated eye, the CT eye, to see it that way.

Now, lets say one corner was mistimed even by a few seconds  (which is what happens in a natural freefall).   Now you have to multiply that late corner by the number of floors to the bottom and between.  This give you the slant of the fall.
This is why implosions are an exact science and require to the second timing in unison.

No, not if the building loses structural integrity, with in the same time period.  from a huge blow of the upper floors crashing down on the floors below the plane crash. (which we could actually see).  Remember, those steal beams at the bottom were shouldering all the weight of the building.  Everything is weaken already becuase of the fire and you have a large chuck of floors crashing down on the building and you see it, pretty clearly.


using logic, you can make a case.  But the case falls apart when you try and test it.

[War-Horse]

Yes. Ive seen buildings fall in earthquakes.  However an earthquake starts to destroy structure from the bottom-up.   This scatters debris everywhere, not staight down in perfect unison.

I feel like ive said enough .  The truth will come out.

[240 is Back]

you currently have thousands of american scientists, physicists, engineers, and professors calling for a new 911 investigation based upon 3 major breaches of the laws of physics which they believe occurred on 911.

instead of answering these questions with a promised report to answer all questions, the white house has just ignored it.  yes, they promised us a full report on, among other things, building #7.  This was 5 years ago, and they said it would take 1-2 years.  The report is now over 3 years late.

it's not coming.  They're not going to tell us anything because if they did put something out, it'd be destroyed for any falsehoods.

Govts all over the world have begun their own investigations, in case you haven't been paying attention.  Time will reveal explosives were used.  I mean, Bush already admitted explosives were planted on the towers (you know that right?)

Seriously, I don't follow this shit anymore, but seeing the level of patriotic ignorance reminds me that yes, 1 in 5 people would rather believe a white house press release than their own lying eyes.

[OzmO]

As I've said many times before, I want another investigation.


But, to believe "the government" wired the buildings with bombs so that when planes rammed into them they would fall down 30 minutes later so that they could justify a war is ludicrous and has no factual basis both logically and using common sense.