dude, Reagan didn't start 2 (possibly 3) massive, decade-long wars.
Whatever Reagan did, it was over quickly with minimal cost. We're talking 50k to 1mil iraqis dead, depending on whose estimates you use. 4000 troops. $1tril borrowed with another $2tril in longterm healthcare costs - that's just Iraq (don't forget we're bogged down way worse in Afghanistan).
It may be worth the cost. The info out there about bases and oil is so mixed up and contradictory, I don't know what to think. I like the idea of setting up bases in iraq. Bush said last week "no permanent bases in Iraq". Was that a lie to appease the Dem/independent voters into voting for mccain, or did he mean it?