Why would hilary twist what adhmedijahad said?

[240 is Back]

For the 3rd time this week, the #3 man in Iran said that 911 was a self-attack.

He also said the US may have exaggerated numbers.

Hilary brings it up during the debate tonight.  Instead of correctly repeating his comments she said "he doesn't even think people died AT ALL on 911!"

Obviously, there were people falling from buildings, obviously his comments said only that the numbers were exaggerated.



I don't understand why Hilary would go out of her way to bring up his statement, then LIE about what he said.

Does she still have any credibility, if she's reduced to lying about what the #3 man in Iran says?

[Hugo Chavez]

So much shit they say gets skewed to extremes by the west.  Hell, If I were one of those guys in Iran, I would just go with it, have some fun.  Start making statements about how they kidnap little cute western babies by the thousands and suck their brains out with a big straw like a bunch of zombies.  shit like that since we don't miss an opportunity to slant things to sound the very worst it can possibly be anyway.  I think it's funny how people are so sure they want to nuke the hell out of Israel.  How's that going to work out; Iran: Here you go Palestinians, your homeland is liberated from the Jews, don't worry about all the radiation...  enjoy your new uninhabitable wasteland...  yea.. lol...

[Mars]

So much shit they say gets skewed to extremes by the west.  Hell, If I were one of those guys in Iran, I would just go with it, have some fun.  Start making statements about how they kidnap little cute western babies by the thousands and suck their brains out with a big straw like a bunch of zombies.  shit like that since we don't miss an opportunity to slant things to sound the very worst it can possibly be anyway.  I think it's funny how people are so sure they want to nuke the hell out of Israel.  How's that going to work out; Iran: Here you go Palestinians, your homeland is liberated from the Jews, don't worry about all the radiation...  enjoy your new uninhabitable wasteland...  yea.. lol...

the Israel lobby is so strong in the US that its no wonder people see Iran as the epitomy of evil. just brainwashed.

[w8tlftr]

the Israel lobby is so strong in the US that its no wonder people see Iran as the epitomy of evil. just brainwashed.

You're right, Mars. Nothing gets by you!

Iran is the lighthouse of freedom in that region of the world.

[Fury]

the Israel lobby is so strong in the US that its no wonder people see Iran as the epitomy of evil. just brainwashed.

STFU wannabe mujahedeen.

Quick question, why do you sit around spewing this shit online while your "lion sheik" brothers are out there dying for their beliefs? Kind of hypocritical and cowardly if you ask me. 

[drkaje]

the Israel lobby is so strong in the US that its no wonder people see Iran as the epitomy of evil. just brainwashed.

You're right. Iran is less of a threat to us than Iraq was. But I don't know if anyone can pull off an actual occupation as US policy especially considering the disaster in Iraq. My guess is Israel will bomb their reactors next year and we'll do nothing. Wouldn't be the first time they took unilateral military action in the region with US financed weapons and it won't be the last. Iran won't be able to do a thing because attacking Israel is attacking the US. The marriage to Israel will ultimately break the US.

The worst thing to happen in Iran would be them electing an actual moderate who was a politian. That being said, there's actually no way for us to exit Iraq and they can't do a stable govt. No stable govt and or something radical means they can hit Israel with a scud missle, meaning we're stuck there pretty much forever. We were better off with Saddam.

[240 is Back]

focus, guys.

this isn't about iran or israel.

this is about Hilary - why would she feel the need to exaggerate what a fringle, pwoerless windbag in Iran said?

She completely distorted what he said.  At that point - comparing the AP wire translation with her interpretation - that iran president has MORE credibility.  Because he didn't lie - she did.

[drkaje]

focus, guys.

this isn't about iran or israel.

this is about Hilary - why would she feel the need to exaggerate what a fringle, pwoerless windbag in Iran said?

She completely distorted what he said.  At that point - comparing the AP wire translation with her interpretation - that iran president has MORE credibility.  Because he didn't lie - she did.

She's pretending he's a threat that will be taken seriously if you elect her. By the time nov rolls around he will probably have WMDs, ICBMs and have Santa, Jesus and the Easter bunny in captivity... he'll be a real threat to us by the election!!!

[Fury]

focus, guys.

this isn't about iran or israel.

this is about Hilary - why would she feel the need to exaggerate what a fringle, pwoerless windbag in Iran said?

She completely distorted what he said.  At that point - comparing the AP wire translation with her interpretation - that iran president has MORE credibility.  Because he didn't lie - she did.

Because the majority of Americans won't know any better and will believe he said it like she paraphrased it.

[240 is Back]

Because the majority of Americans won't know any better and will believe he said it like she paraphrased it.

True.

[Decker]

You're right. Iran is less of a threat to us than Iraq was. But I don't know if anyone can pull off an actual occupation as US policy especially considering the disaster in Iraq. My guess is Israel will bomb their reactors next year and we'll do nothing. Wouldn't be the first time they took unilateral military action in the region with US financed weapons and it won't be the last. Iran won't be able to do a thing because attacking Israel is attacking the US. The marriage to Israel will ultimately break the US.

That bombing could happen.  The US will do nothing b/c Israel has the US's tacit support.  Israel is a de facto satellite of the US.

The worst thing to happen in Iran would be them electing an actual moderate who was a politian. That being said, there's actually no way for us to exit Iraq and they can't do a stable govt. No stable govt and or something radical means they can hit Israel with a scud missle, meaning we're stuck there pretty much forever. We were better off with Saddam.

The Saudis were better off as well.  The Iraqi buffer zone has been destabalized.


As for Clinton, I think BerzerkFury got it right.  She's not a dumb woman.  She knows the score and she's playing the public as badly as the Bush Administration.

[Mars]

You're right, Mars. Nothing gets by you!

Iran is the lighthouse of freedom in that region of the world.

did i said it was the lighthouse of freedom? offcourse the human right issue should be fought on with diplomatic force.

[headhuntersix]

Which has worked so well in the past right...they laugh at us as they build their bombs and kick the shit out the population.