Author Topic: Iran war expected soon.  (Read 2185 times)

War-Horse

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6490
Iran war expected soon.
« on: June 09, 2008, 08:12:50 PM »
The only reason that this failed was that Russia and China told the U.S. to STFU.  :o

Read here that any terrorstrike at all is to be blamed on Iran.  Some are saying that we can expect a major action around August/October.     Neosatans are so predictable.



Cheney Orders Media To Sell Attack On Iran
Fox News, Wall Street Journal instructed to launch PR blitz for upcoming military strike
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Tuesday, September 4, 2007
   

Dick Cheney has ordered top Neo-Con media outlets, including Fox News and the Wall Street Journal, to unleash a PR blitz to sell a war with Iran from today, according to Barnett Rubin, the highly respected Afghanistan expert at New York University.

The New Yorker magazine reports that Rubin had a conversation with a member of a top neoconservative institution in Washington, who told him that "instructions" had been passed on from the Office of the Vice-President to roll out a campaign for war with Iran in the week after Labor Day.

"It will be coordinated with the American Enterprise Institute, the Wall Street Journal, the Weekly Standard, Commentary, Fox, and the usual suspects, writes Rubin, "It will be heavy sustained assault on the airwaves, designed to knock public sentiment into a position from which a war can be maintained. Evidently they don’t think they’ll ever get majority support for this—they want something like 35-40 percent support, which in their book is “plenty.”
Rubin subsequently confirmed with a second source that the propaganda coup had been launched and the individual, another top Neo-Con at a major think tank, had this to say about it: “I am a Republican. I am a conservative. But I’m not a raging lunatic. This is lunatic.”

(Article continues below)




An organized mass media campaign to propagandize for a military strike on Iran mirrors exactly what happened in late 2002 in preparation for the invasion of Iraq and would be seen as par for the course in anticipation of an attack that presidential candidate Ron Paul amongst other expert observers fear will take place within 12 months.

President Bush met directly with talk radio idealogues at the White House last year to push the Neo-Con agenda. Sean Hannity, Laura Ingraham, Neal Boortz and Michael Medved (pictured below) amongst others all attended and received their talking points straight from the President's mouth.



Considering the history of the sordid "fake news" scandal, where millions of dollars were used to create pre-packaged government press releases disguised as news, along with the Armstrong Williams farce, it should surprise no one that such "instructions" are now being handed out to prepare the public for another military invasion.

The issuance of orders for Neo-Con mass media arms to push for an assault on Iran also puts the U.S. on red alert for a terror attack, whether real or manufactured, which Dick Cheney has already promised will immediately be blamed on Iran no matter who the real culprits are.

On August 1st, 2005 the American Conservative reported that Cheney had tasked the United States Strategic Command (STRATCOM) with drawing up a contingency plan to be employed in response to another 9/11-type terrorist attack on the United States. The plan involved a massive air strike on Iran which included the use of nuclear weapons.

The publication reported that, "The response is not conditional on Iran actually being involved in the act of terrorism directed against the United States," meaning that any such attack will immediately be blamed on Iran and any evidence to the contrary will be buried.

The London Times reported on Sunday that the Pentagon had finalized plans for a 3 day blitz designed to annihilate 1,200 targets in Iran and destroy the country's military capability.

Alexis Debat, director of terrorism and national security at the Nixon Center, said last week that US military planners were not preparing for “pinprick strikes” against Iran’s nuclear facilities. “They’re about taking out the entire Iranian military,” he said.

Debat was speaking at a meeting organised by The National Interest, a conservative foreign policy journal. He told The Sunday Times that the US military had concluded: “Whether you go for pinprick strikes or all-out military action, the reaction from the Iranians will be the same.” It was, he added, a “very legitimate strategic calculus”.

Rhetoric regarding a potential military attack on Iran has heated again over the past week, with President Bush having warned of the risk of a "nuclear holocaust" if the country was allowed to acquire nuclear capability.

In a speech last Monday, French President Nicolas Sarkozy said that a diplomatic push by the world's powers to rein in Tehran's nuclear program was the only alternative to "an Iranian bomb or the bombing of Iran."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Internet leader in activist media - Prison Planet.tv. Get access to hundreds of special video reports, audio interviews, books and documentary films. Subscribers also get instant access to our hugely popular forum where you can network with like-minded people, meet up and get active! Click here to subscribe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad subsequently stated that a U.S. attack on Iran was "impossible" due to U.S. troops being tied down in Afghanistan and Iraq. Yesterday, he claimed to have proof that the U.S. were not planning to attack, bizarrely citing his mathematical skills as an engineer and faith in God.

A January poll by Ipsos found that 40% of Americans thought it likely that Iran would be attacked by the end of the year. The U.S. has stationed three aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf, the Nimitz, a nuclear-powered carrier, John C. Stennis Strike Group, and Dwight D. Eisenhower, a relief carrier.

The U.S. government is openly funding and supporting the activities of Jundullah, a Sunni Al-Qaeda terrorist group formerly headed by the alleged mastermind of 9/11, to carry out bombings in Iran and destabilize Ahmadinejad's power base.

The Iranian Revolutionary Guard military was recently declared to be a terrorist organization by the White House, another ominous sign that an attack is being readied.

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11062
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2008, 09:04:03 PM »
Barnett Rubin, the highly respected Afghanistan expert at New York University

lmao, that must be code for terror cell living in the US  ::)

War-Horse

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6490
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2008, 09:13:17 PM »
Barnett Rubin, the highly respected Afghanistan expert at New York University

lmao, that must be code for terror cell living in the US  ::)


Its Dr Rubin to you.     You ready for the Iran war YAM?

CQ

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7018
  • TGT
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2008, 02:50:04 AM »
The only reason that this failed was that Russia and China told the U.S. to STFU.  :o

ROFL ;D

I wonder if these people are sane. Troops stretched already, biggest debtor in world, economy is tanking and they want more war on a nation that has *not* attacked them. Why not at least focus on the economy for a bit, instead of borrowing more cash from people to fund another war? They can commit mass murder later on when economy is back up.

The U.S. government is openly funding and supporting the activities of Jundullah, a Sunni Al-Qaeda terrorist group formerly headed by the alleged mastermind of 9/11, to carry out bombings in Iran and destabilize Ahmadinejad's power base.


People forget how much the USA *admits* to funding terrorist groups.

Posada the Venezualan admitted terrorist who took down a plane full of passengers and bombed for over a decade killing stacks of people, has been given legal asylum in the USA. Strange, a country that decries terrorism funds it, and allows terrorist safety from justice on their soil. But when the world complains, worries about a superpower running around starting wars, objects to the killing of innocent civilians and kids, we are "jealous" ::)

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #4 on: June 10, 2008, 05:08:24 AM »
Sorry,  don't buy it.  Anything from prison planet is straight bull sh1t.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #5 on: June 10, 2008, 07:15:56 AM »
This is ridiculous.......we're not going. That ship sailed about a year ago. Anything that starts with....Dick Cheney has ordered top Neo-Con media outlets, including Fox News and the Wall Street Journal...is complete bullshit. Both are highly respected news outlets regardless of what the hype is.
L

War-Horse

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6490
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2008, 10:48:58 AM »
This is ridiculous.......we're not going. That ship sailed about a year ago. Anything that starts with....Dick Cheney has ordered top Neo-Con media outlets, including Fox News and the Wall Street Journal...is complete bullshit. Both are highly respected news outlets regardless of what the hype is.


Any other options that bush will use to raise awareness of terrorism???    How about an attack on Israel...that might work....

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2008, 11:01:32 AM »
This is ridiculous.......we're not going. That ship sailed about a year ago. Anything that starts with....Dick Cheney has ordered top Neo-Con media outlets, including Fox News and the Wall Street Journal...is complete bullshit. Both are highly respected news outlets regardless of what the hype is.

you meant this as a joke right? 

I mean at least regarding Faux News

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11062
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #8 on: June 10, 2008, 11:05:52 AM »
you meant this as a joke right? 

I mean at least regarding Faux News

Is that why they have 4x as many viewers as CNN Communist National News?

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #9 on: June 10, 2008, 11:11:27 AM »
Is that why they have 4x as many viewers as CNN Communist National News?

so you're saying that viewership = authenticity

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11062
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #10 on: June 10, 2008, 11:13:03 AM »
so you're saying that viewership = authenticity

umm so your actually going to try and say you had a basis for saying faux news?

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #11 on: June 10, 2008, 11:13:50 AM »
umm so your actually going to try and say you had a basis for saying faux news?

?

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2008, 11:18:37 AM »
so you're saying that viewership = authenticity

About two billion people read the Koran everyday, more than read the bible.

By youandme's standards, the Koran is more accurate than the bible.

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11062
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #13 on: June 10, 2008, 11:25:16 AM »
About two billion people read the Koran everyday, more than read the bible.

By youandme's standards, the Koran is more accurate than the bible.

Haha then that is fucked.

Slapper

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4305
  • Vincit qui se vincit
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #14 on: June 10, 2008, 12:23:17 PM »
This is ridiculous.......we're not going. That ship sailed about a year ago. Anything that starts with....Dick Cheney has ordered top Neo-Con media outlets, including Fox News and the Wall Street Journal...is complete bullshit. Both are highly respected news outlets regardless of what the hype is.

Riiiight. Because both, I'd say 99% of mainstream media, investigated things like... I dunno, the claim that Irak had nuclear weapons? The fact that the Prague connection was a complete fabricated lie? I mean, the fact of the matter is that the mainstream media takes whatever the government says to them as fact, and they dare not investigate anything. Even if it means saving thousands of innocent lives. Remember The New York Times' first page title of "Case Closed" when describing the case laid out at the UN by Colin Powell? What a fucking farce. I'd be really ashamed to work for that paper right now.

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #15 on: June 10, 2008, 12:28:17 PM »
Wasn't 240 claiming repeatedly that we were going to invade on March 31st or some time around then? Whatever happened with that? More CT bullshit.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #16 on: June 10, 2008, 01:55:39 PM »
Wasn't 240 claiming repeatedly that we were going to invade on March 31st or some time around then? Whatever happened with that? More CT bullshit.

well, sir, it was Russia that said mar 28 of last year was invasion date (4 months before the date, in early jan). the week before mar 28, we sent over 3 big boats and troops at the border.  the media was talking about iran nonstop.

On mar 23rd, 15 UK soldiers were captured in iran's waters, remember?  they had orders to fight, and they disobeyed them.  Their escorts all disappeared, and suddenly they were surrounded by 6 iranian gunships.  they didn't fire on them when captured, violating their orders. 

coulda been another gulf of tonken incident.  many of them had coincidentally been interviewed by UK media the week before, coincidentally the pretty blonde girl and a few of the strong-jawed guys.  Young and happy for the cameras.

Some people thought it was the bait to cause a clash to justify UK, then USA, bombing the shit out of them.  instead, Iran treated them nicely and released them.  The US generals on tv (pundits) were outraged the kids didn't open fire on iran's boats.

That's what happened with it.  more CT bullshit?  possible.  but look at the war rampup, the bait, and what would have been the obvious outcome.  Things that make you go hmmm...

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #17 on: June 10, 2008, 02:02:59 PM »
you meant this as a joke right? 

I mean at least regarding Faux News

Ah no..who's number 1...Fox News. U might not like em..but they're number one.
L

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #18 on: June 10, 2008, 02:15:11 PM »
Ah no..who's number 1...Fox News. U might not like em..but they're number one.

conservatives and libs watch different things at night.  based on the age alone.

more younger folks go out, raise families, go to school, work, and date at night.
more older folks sit in the recliner at night and watch boring talk political shows.

Throw a rally... see which party can draw more people... same thing... dems are more likely to go to a rally than repubs will.  (compare obama and mccains' crowds).  A LOT more young people will go stand in sun for an hour to hear obama talk for 12 minutes, than elderly people will for mccain.

Neither matters.  Election day is what matters.  You know most repubs will show up.  i the obama youth vote shows up, he wins.  If they don't mccian wins.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66395
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #19 on: June 10, 2008, 03:30:35 PM »
Sorry,  don't buy it.  Anything from prison planet is straight bull sh1t.

Yep.

War-Horse

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6490
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #20 on: June 10, 2008, 07:09:57 PM »
Iran didnt take the bait.  Russia and china were watching...nothing happened but a bunch of posing.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #21 on: June 11, 2008, 07:25:19 AM »
Russia and China can't do anything about it. As of now they can't project power there. China has a huge vested interest in seeing IOran shut the hell up and pump oil. It does them no good if their major oil supply is irradiated. It would not matter if the country comes under new management, they would still get their oil. They have and will way what disrupts their country and economy the least and go with tghat. The EU is talking about freezing assests. I would bet China has been consulted. Everybody wants something.
L

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11062
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #22 on: June 11, 2008, 07:39:39 AM »
General Electric still continues to do business in Iran, Goodyear as well.

Pretty shitty when we have UK backing us on this no business to Iran and they got Barclays to end the relationship in 2006 and were still trying to pull off US companies.

CQ

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7018
  • TGT
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #23 on: June 11, 2008, 07:45:40 AM »
The EU is talking about freezing assests. I would bet China has been consulted.

At the risk of sounding a simplistic moron, that is what I like to read. International co-operation using all diplomatic levels possible.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Iran war expected soon.
« Reply #24 on: June 11, 2008, 07:50:05 AM »
This is the way to get them. Either u cut off the cash and the mullahs string up Amedinjihad :D...or maybe u go even farther and the students reverse 1979 and we get a moderate islamic or secular state. I do not think that we will attack, Israel might. They have done it before and aren't afraid of doing it again. I think the problem there is that they will only hit the nuke plants, while we would have cut Iran to pieces, making it harder for them to meddle in Iraq and cut the Straight of Hormuz.
L