Author Topic: Speak on this....I'm conflicted..... (Read 1541 times)

Bluto · « **Reply #1 on:** November 17, 2008, 11:22:43 AM »

girl in the middle got fixed tits so i guess she's not underage which makes the whole thing pointless

Man of Steel · « **Reply #2 on:** November 17, 2008, 11:24:00 AM »

That girl in the middle looks 15 years old.

Bluto · « **Reply #3 on:** November 17, 2008, 11:24:39 AM »

Quote from: Man of Steel on November 17, 2008, 11:24:00 AM

That girl in the middle looks 15 years old.

isnt that a legal age? it is here

divcom · « **Reply #4 on:** November 17, 2008, 11:24:48 AM »

love the ladies but the r kelly stuff is out. if they are potential sub-18...then no need to post.

TommyBoy · « **Reply #5 on:** November 17, 2008, 11:25:54 AM »

Quote from: Bluto on November 17, 2008, 11:22:43 AM

girl in the middle got fixed tits so i guess she's not underage which makes the whole thing pointless

Nah, her boobs are real. Her pics were floating around years ago. They are quite real. She's legal.

Man of Steel · « **Reply #6 on:** November 17, 2008, 11:26:18 AM »

I'm not tryin to be some gross perv here, but the girls in high school never looked like the one in the middle.

Bluto · « **Reply #7 on:** November 17, 2008, 11:26:58 AM »

Quote from: TommyBoy on November 17, 2008, 11:25:54 AM

Nah, her boobs are real. Her pics were floating around years ago. They are quite real. She's legal.

doesnt look real to me, tits are fat, she's not fat enough to have fat tits

TommyBoy · « **Reply #8 on:** November 17, 2008, 11:29:06 AM »

Quote from: Bluto on November 17, 2008, 11:26:58 AM

doesnt look real to me, tits are fat, she's not fat enough to have fat tits

I'm not going on a porn hunt, but there were a LOT of pics of this chick. They're real.

Reiterate...also legal.

johnnynoname · « **Reply #9 on:** November 17, 2008, 11:29:22 AM »

her tits are reals because they appear to have a natural slope.

m8 · « **Reply #10 on:** November 17, 2008, 11:31:06 AM »

I've seen bigger natural tits on a 15-16 years old.
However, their faces are generally shitty.

Boost · « **Reply #11 on:** November 17, 2008, 11:33:44 AM »

The one on the right looks about 13

BobbyHasBeenBad · « **Reply #12 on:** November 17, 2008, 11:43:59 AM »

Underage girls do nothing for my cock.

I dont care how pretty they are.....it just doesn't do it for me. They still look like children at 17 18 and 19 and that doesn't get me turned on.

Canadian_Muscle · « **Reply #13 on:** November 17, 2008, 11:49:33 AM »

Looks pretty gross. I prefer this.

Earl1972 · « **Reply #14 on:** November 17, 2008, 11:56:36 AM »

butter faces

E

Mars · « **Reply #15 on:** November 17, 2008, 11:57:10 AM »

wheres the conflict, id line them up bent over the table and fuck those snatches.

Mr. Magoo · « **Reply #16 on:** November 17, 2008, 02:57:57 PM »

i can't believe this....they're all legal!!!

just because a girl looks under 25 doesnt make her jailbait. I'm in college and thats how all the girls around here look. Some around here can even be said to be as young as 12 if the person didnt know any better, others can pass for 23-25 when they're barely 18. And most of the "barely 18" porn you guys get off on star ladies as old as 25 or so.

sheesh

people will fall for anything

had to rant

TrapsMcLats · « **Reply #17 on:** November 17, 2008, 03:04:25 PM »

there are more pics of her? where?

Tre · « **Reply #18 on:** November 17, 2008, 03:17:36 PM »

I read from some anonymous source that all the girls in that pic were 18 at the time the pic was shot.

Sam · « **Reply #19 on:** November 17, 2008, 04:01:52 PM »