When big brand UG's like Axio and Syntrop publicize their lab analyses, are you skeptical of the validity or do you buy-in wholly to the approach that they are being honest and forthright?
I understand the level of skepticism from some of you who were fucked over in the past by this company, but what is your opinion of their new approach to doing business?
I don't see how any lab analysis can be questioned unless you're going to simply accuse the lab of doctoring the results.
If you pick out batch and check the label claims, wouldn't you have to pretty much assume that they're valid?
Remember, this is coming from someone who uses HG for all cycles so I'm not a person who lives and dies with UG's and whether they end up prospering or going belly-up.
I hear random critiques of Axio, Syntrop, Geneza and I take them with a grain of salt, quite frankly unless I know the actual people personally who are commenting.
The idea behind my sampling of Axio's Sustaplex 325 was simply to give newbies and skeptical UG veterans a chance to hear what someone with no stake in the label has to say about it.
Honestly, I'm skeptical from the outset because of my prior experiences with UG quality, but if Sustaplex can come close to matching what Organon Sustanon (Karachi) does, I'll be pleasantly surprised.
For those of you who are skeptical of lab analysis, I'm curious as to why and how you would go about holding a UG accountable for quality assurance?
From a business perspective, they're doing what they can to instill customer confidence, now it's just a matter of consistency and making up for the past.
I never bought any of these brands, so I don't feel the anger and betrayal some of you do from Axio's not so distant past.
I'd like to hear some of these horror stories from some of you, esp those who bought bulk purchase of Axio after they went bad and were left with a shitload of useless oil.
Those are interesting stories.
DIV