Author Topic: Ron, it's time for a "Would you hit it" section on getbig  (Read 2968 times)

ahh.. fk

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 374
  • Greed is good
Re: Ron, it's time for a "Would you hit it" section on getbig
« Reply #25 on: December 30, 2008, 10:04:51 PM »
now where is that penguin faced asian chick when you need her. lol

gordiano

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17124
  • TEAM "CUTE PENIS", TEAM TRIFLIN' RONNIE COLEMAN
Re: Ron, it's time for a "Would you hit it" section on getbig
« Reply #26 on: December 30, 2008, 11:15:19 PM »
don't remember off hand, a couple of these twinkies said "she's too thick". ::)

Wow... :-\
HAHA, RON.....

calfzilla

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20790
  • YUMAN FILTH!
Re: Ron, it's time for a "Would you hit it" section on getbig
« Reply #27 on: December 30, 2008, 11:41:42 PM »
Yes we do need a "would you hit it" section.  I find that I can't get enough of these.  That chick that Quaker put up is nearly perfection.   :P

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: Ron, it's time for a "Would you hit it" section on getbig
« Reply #28 on: December 30, 2008, 11:50:04 PM »

PTB

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 308
  • Getbig!
Re: Ron, it's time for a "Would you hit it" section on getbig
« Reply #29 on: December 31, 2008, 09:23:33 AM »
by rule, shouldn't "would you hit it's" be somewhat questionable?

if you post someone too hot, the question seems redundant.  If she's fugly, even more redundant.  Shouldn't they be for "girl next door" types, girls a tad thin, a tad thick, a tad muscluar?  Unless you're into women of specific races, hair colors, etc., most answers would be obvious.

technokc

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1761
  • Official member Getbig 300!!
Re: Ron, it's time for a "Would you hit it" section on getbig
« Reply #30 on: December 31, 2008, 01:39:13 PM »
One of you Getbig Detectives need to find out who this girl is. . . . . it is a simple unacceptable tragedy to have only one pic of her and no name.