Author Topic: Bluto Gimmicks  (Read 1926 times)

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Bluto Gimmicks
« Reply #25 on: March 24, 2009, 07:39:45 PM »
Why u so sure that bigmc is NZMM , kiwi?

Flames the same guys NZ has a beef with, has admitted to posting under that account himself, makes up stuff that is simply not true, has a known history of having gimmicks etc. My guess is as good as any and there are a couple more points that would be too gay to mention or elaborate upon. I don't think it's just NZ though - I think there's more than one person who might be posting. But really, who cares? Just message board drama.

I'm saying nzmm needs a little ewe to ram.

Hahaha

CalvinH

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22222
  • Spastic Tarted Cvunt
Re: Bluto Gimmicks
« Reply #26 on: March 25, 2009, 07:46:43 AM »
???






The question is who knows more useless facts,you or him :D

dr.chimps

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28635
  • Chimpus ergo sum
Re: Bluto Gimmicks
« Reply #27 on: March 25, 2009, 07:49:34 AM »
The question is who knows more useless facts,you or him :D
LOL. I'm all about useless. Facts, too.

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16155
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Bluto Gimmicks
« Reply #28 on: March 25, 2009, 07:55:46 AM »
So how many accounts has bluto got active here now? A guy with 33333 posts doesn't just decide to stop posting.

It's a shame that a legend like Bluto wastes his time with gimmicks. He could already have 55555 posts under his main account :-\

Bobby

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5219
  • is da lordes plan
Re: Bluto Gimmicks
« Reply #29 on: March 25, 2009, 09:14:15 AM »
tank u jesus

Deicide

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22921
  • Reapers...
Re: Bluto Gimmicks
« Reply #30 on: March 25, 2009, 09:19:04 AM »
Flames the same guys NZ has a beef with, has admitted to posting under that account himself, makes up stuff that is simply not true, has a known history of having gimmicks etc. My guess is as good as any and there are a couple more points that would be too gay to mention or elaborate upon. I don't think it's just NZ though - I think there's more than one person who might be posting. But really, who cares? Just message board drama.

Hahaha

I think we are currently seeing an interesting semantic shift; in former times 'gay' simply meant happy; then it meant homosexual and these days I think it is shifting still further (and I employ this way too) to mean 'lame, uncool'. It is fascinating to observe.  :)
I hate the State.