Author Topic: David Henry - 202lb winner and 15th at the O. Your thoughts? (Read 4372 times)

clued-up · « **Reply #25 on:** April 13, 2009, 12:08:18 AM »

Quote from: webcke on April 13, 2009, 12:06:03 AM

You mean that in a positive or negative way?

I'm not sure.. I'm confused.

Steve Namat · « **Reply #26 on:** April 13, 2009, 12:09:18 AM »

He have awesome size on his upper body but his legs are weak. Anyway he looks very good from the side and even better from the back, but I think he isn't good from the front and I don't like his proportions.

BTW here is a pic from the 2008 Tampa Pro which he won (I placed 6th). I standed next to him and he's better but not by a country mile...but that just my opinion. And I'm a rookie pro without any high placings.

clued-up · « **Reply #27 on:** April 13, 2009, 12:15:20 AM »

yes.. your legs are far better.

Per Se · « **Reply #28 on:** April 13, 2009, 06:22:45 AM »

Quote from: Steve Namat on April 13, 2009, 12:09:18 AM

He have awesome size on his upper body but his legs are weak. Anyway he looks very good from the side and even better from the back, but I think he isn't good from the front and I don't like his proportions.

BTW here is a pic from the 2008 Tampa Pro which he won (I placed 6th). I standed next to him and he's better but not by a country mile...but that just my opinion. And I'm a rookie pro without any high placings.

Lookin good bro.

spinnis · « **Reply #29 on:** April 13, 2009, 06:31:59 AM »

Quote from: Steve Namat on April 13, 2009, 12:09:18 AM

He have awesome size on his upper body but his legs are weak. Anyway he looks very good from the side and even better from the back, but I think he isn't good from the front and I don't like his proportions.

BTW here is a pic from the 2008 Tampa Pro which he won (I placed 6th). I standed next to him and he's better but not by a country mile...but that just my opinion. And I'm a rookie pro without any high placings.

when you guys turn around its lights out for you though

Steve Namat · « **Reply #30 on:** April 13, 2009, 10:25:02 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on April 13, 2009, 06:31:59 AM

when you guys turn around its lights out for you though

That's true of course.

polychronopolous · « **Reply #31 on:** April 13, 2009, 10:28:09 AM »

Quote from: Swede! on April 13, 2009, 06:31:59 AM

when you guys turn around its lights out for you though

You would have thought all those 750lb deadlifts Steve Namat was performing when he was 15 years old would have helped him create a larger back.

Fatpanda · « **Reply #32 on:** April 13, 2009, 10:28:19 AM »

he should have finished higher.

he is a very good bodybuilder who is very underrated.

his placing makes a mockery of the judging criteria IMO.

challenge · « **Reply #33 on:** April 13, 2009, 10:30:19 AM »

Man its so easy for guys under 5'5" to build muscle!

challenge · « **Reply #34 on:** April 13, 2009, 10:38:54 AM »

Quote from: polychronopolous on April 13, 2009, 10:28:09 AM

You would have thought all those 750lb deadlifts Steve Namat was performing when he was 15 years old would have helped him create a larger back.

lol did he really?

polychronopolous · « **Reply #35 on:** April 13, 2009, 10:41:24 AM »

Quote from: challenge on April 13, 2009, 10:38:54 AM

lol did he really?

Yeah he was on here a few months ago spouting off those claims like a big shot.

I had to quickly put him in his place... lets just say the subject hasn't come up very much recently and leave it at that.

BroadStreetBruiser · « **Reply #36 on:** April 13, 2009, 10:44:01 AM »

With david's short arms I bet he has a problem getting change out of his pockets for the vending machine HAHAHA HAHAOUJAIOUAL

challenge · « **Reply #37 on:** April 13, 2009, 11:04:10 AM »

Quote from: polychronopolous on April 13, 2009, 10:41:24 AM

Yeah he was on here a few months ago spouting off those claims like a big shot.

I had to quickly put him in his place... lets just say the subject hasn't come up very much recently and leave it at that.

well done then! did he learn his lesson?

Steve Namat · « **Reply #38 on:** April 13, 2009, 11:09:39 AM »

Quote from: polychronopolous on April 13, 2009, 10:28:09 AM

You would have thought all those 750lb deadlifts Steve Namat was performing when he was 15 years old would have helped him create a larger back.

Yeah, another idiot getbig-expert...

I said that I already did 530 in deadlift when I was 17 years old...

BIG_STI · « **Reply #39 on:** April 13, 2009, 11:16:39 AM »

fucking midget.

challenge · « **Reply #40 on:** April 13, 2009, 11:34:36 AM »

Quote from: Steve Namat on April 13, 2009, 11:09:39 AM

Yeah, another idiot getbig-expert...

I said that I already did 530 in deadlift when I was 17 years old...

Awesome shot... do you do any deadlifts nowadays?

I believe you could pull 530 at your height easy.

njflex · « **Reply #41 on:** April 13, 2009, 12:06:09 PM »

namat great build all around.

Steve Namat · « **Reply #42 on:** April 13, 2009, 12:10:26 PM »

Quote from: challenge on April 13, 2009, 11:34:36 AM

Awesome shot... do you do any deadlifts nowadays?

I believe you could pull 530 at your height easy.

Since I was a competitive bodybuilder I never did the deadlifts too seriously. I did them sometimes (maybe in every 3-4 weeks) and my best was always a 4-5 x 550 set.

Now I'm just doing stiff leg deadlifts for hams but with moderate weight and high reps.

Per Se · « **Reply #43 on:** April 13, 2009, 12:12:03 PM »

Quote from: Fatpanda on April 13, 2009, 10:28:19 AM

he should have finished higher.

he is a very good bodybuilder who is very underrated.

his placing makes a mockery of the judging criteria IMO.

You've hit the nail on the head Panda...were there better guys than him? Of course there were.

BUT were there 14 guys better than him? Hmmm.

polychronopolous · « **Reply #44 on:** April 13, 2009, 12:12:17 PM »

Quote from: challenge on April 13, 2009, 11:34:36 AM

Awesome shot... do you do any deadlifts nowadays?

I believe you could pull 530 at your height easy.

Nah he claims that he "peaked" in his ability to deadlift as a teenager.

All evidence, video or photos of this alleged lift have disappeared too, coincidentally.....

Per Se · « **Reply #45 on:** April 13, 2009, 12:16:10 PM »

Quote from: polychronopolous on April 13, 2009, 12:12:17 PM

Nah he claims that he "peaked" in his ability to deadlift as a teenager.

All evidence, video or photos of this alleged lift have disappeared too, coincidentally.....

Too many haters on here...if he said he could do it, take his word for it, or shut the fuck up.
Why carry on???

Steve Namat · « **Reply #46 on:** April 13, 2009, 12:20:09 PM »

Quote from: polychronopolous on April 13, 2009, 12:12:17 PM

Nah he claims that he "peaked" in his ability to deadlift as a teenager.

All evidence, video or photos of this alleged lift have disappeared too, coincidentally.....

As a teenager I did deadlifts in every week, very hard, for at almost 45 minutes per session. And I did 530.

530 at 17 (natural) is far better then 5 x 550 at 23, isn't it?

polychronopolous · « **Reply #47 on:** April 13, 2009, 12:23:47 PM »

Quote from: Per Se on April 13, 2009, 12:16:10 PM

Too many haters on here...if he said he could do it, take his word for it, or shut the fuck up.
Why carry on???

I like to come on the internet and give professional bodybuilders a hard time.

It makes me feel like a real man.

Steve Namat · « **Reply #48 on:** April 13, 2009, 12:56:42 PM »

Quote from: polychronopolous on April 13, 2009, 12:23:47 PM

I like to come on the internet and give professional bodybuilders a hard time.

It makes me feel like a real man.

Thank you for being honest!

After this feel free to talk any shit about myself, my friend!

polychronopolous · « **Reply #49 on:** April 13, 2009, 01:05:12 PM »

Quote from: Steve Namat on April 13, 2009, 12:56:42 PM

Thank you for being honest!

After this feel free to talk any shit about myself, my friend!

Thank u friend.

You are a good man, Steve.

Author Topic: David Henry - 202lb winner and 15th at the O. Your thoughts? (Read 4372 times)

spinnis