Better worker or better draw?
It's not even close, as to who the better worker is. Hogan was part of a business boom back in the 80's and was a huge crossover star. Michaels had his run during shitty business years, and just missed the beginning of next boom (Attitude Era).
No offense, but only a clueless fan would compare HBK to Hogan.
Damn,
You HBK marks get defensive (LOL).
Okay, I’m not doubting your
"savior," but I am getting at something bigger here and Gordy hit it right away.
I pretty much expected the answers we got, and I agree with what is said.
The bigger question I have:
We all agree that Shawn is a better worker.
Even most casual wrestling fans will defend Shawn as such.
So how was it that a much less talented worker like Hogan drew so much more money than HBK.
Is character really that much more important than skill?
Or was it timing like Gordiano suggests?
Michaels was forced to take time off after dropping the belt to Austin at WM14.
Fans didn’t know that break was coming, and were cheering a rapidly rising Austin
over HBK.
He was onto something big with D-X, but fans still wanted 3:16 as their new savior. So if Shawn – also a better worker than Austin – had stuck out the Attitude Era – then would he have been top man?
Even on equal grounds as Austin?
Or would he have continued to be used as he was at WM to get Austin over?