Do you believe the mother should be charged with murder if she is "killing a baby" by choosing to have an abortion? And if the father supports the mother's decision not to carry the fetus to term, should he not be charged as an accomplice?
the problem is we havent determined when life begins, so first lets define that...
if it is deemed that the fetus is indeed alive then how would it not be murder?
to answer your question though if (and thats a big if since we dont have a point in time that says this fetus is alive) the fetus is deemed to be alive and the mother has an abortion for reasons other then the mothers health or perhaps the babies health yes it would be murder in order to charge the father he must be an accomplice not simply supportive of her decision. To me is sounded like john was saying simply b/c the man was the father of that child he was an accomplice which is stupid. You forget that the father has no say in whether the woman gets an abortion or not so no simply supporting HER CHOICE does not make him an accomplice, now if he physically helps drives her to the clinic etc...then i could possibly see grounds for it but again in the end the decision is the WOMANS and hers alone which in itself is ridiculous.
