I agree and have said many times that I am open to any credible evidence or CT that makes logic or coherent sense. So far I see questions and little else.
The ONLY possible argument I see is that, in the U.S., we have never had strict pre-flight screening like they do in countries like Turkey, where passengers have to arrive 3 hours early to travel as every inch of
everyone's carry-ons are carefully scrutinized.
BUT, in the wake of the attempted Christmas Day attack, the civil libertarians are arguing that millions of passengers would be 'unnecessarily inconvenienced' (their words) by that level of scrutiny either here or on planes bound for U.S. soil, even if it did make air travel much safer.
So, if there's a right-wing conspiracy to bring American planes down, then the civil libertarians are in on it, too.
...
Regarding what happened after the Twin Towers were hit, it *is* possible that Bldg 7 (I believe that's the one) was destroyed in order to prevent the leakage of certain information. I read something that seemed credible about this several years ago, but cannot recall the details. I did agree (and still do) that buildings are often rigged with auto-destruction mechanisms to protect company or even national security. I have a kill switch on my computers in my office and I'm sure many companies have something similar in place.
