Author Topic: To Thwart Distracted Driving, US Government Considers Cell Phone Jammers in Cars  (Read 9594 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39978
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
I don't have any gimmicks. 

Also - I was thinking about this thread whle driving to work. 

Speeding kills thousands a year no?    Why doesnt the govt install a chip to slow you down when it feels you are going too fast? 

Drunk Driving kills thousands a year no?   Why doesnt the govt install a brethalizer fr EVERYONE to turn the car on? 


Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
It's all very simple the government identifies something that may cause a small percentage of accidents, then to gain more power and control penalizes everyone for that small percent. They have been doing this sort of shit for a long time, the old give um an inch and they take a mile mentality.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22731
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Why doesn't the government make 2nd offenses punishable by a 5 year suspension ?

Why doesn't the government spend more money to prevent road hazards?

How about hands free radios?

Yet we got this stupid shit.

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Because its not about fixing anything, half the time the government is trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist. It's about control plain and simple. To many of these people have a god complex.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22731
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Because its not about fixing anything, half the time the government is trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist. It's about control plain and simple. To many of these people have a god complex.


It's the "do-gooders" we need to muzzle.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39978
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

Rear-view cameras on cars could become mandatory (LA Times)
Los Angeles Times ^ | 12/4/2010 | Jerry Hirsch




The federal government wants automakers to install back-up cameras in all new vehicles starting in late 2014.

The plan, announced Friday, received a strong endorsement from insurance industry and other analysts and is likely to get some level of support from car manufacturers.

"There is no more tragic accident than for a parent or caregiver to back out of a garage or driveway and kill or injure an undetected child playing behind the vehicle," Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said. "The changes we are proposing today will help drivers see into those blind zones directly behind vehicles to make sure it is safe to back up."


(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MB_722

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11173
  • RIP Keith
no they shouldn't be ^^

use your eyes & 2% of your brain to reverse without electronic aides.

it's simple, if you can reverse a semi/tractor with no camera you can do it on any other vehicle.

use your eyes/mirrors.

electronics have made people sloppy drivers.

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22731
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Its another stupid law to pent stupid people from making mistakes.

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
To the moron that said this measure will save lives-- Why not reduce the speed limit to 10mph? That would save lives also. In fact, I think the United States should force car manufacturers to keep their cars from going over 10mph so people dont even have the option of speeding.

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Late to this one... Let them do it.

I guarantee that technology will find a way to subvert it as well.

Fuck this shit... Fuck anyone who thinks this is a good idea or should be done.

Fascists.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39978
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
LaHood: Automakers should block texts, tweets and browsing
By Ashley Halsey III, Published: February 16
Drivers won’t be able to text, browse, tweet or dial on factory-installed devices if auto manufacturers follow new federal guidelines to disable the gadgets while the wheels are rolling.

In announcing the latest step in his campaign against distracted driving Thursday, U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said the government might next extend the guidelines to cover virtually every portable electronic device that could find its way into a vehicle.

“These guidelines are a major step forward in identifying real solutions to tackle the issue of distracted driving for drivers of all ages,” said LaHood, who has made distracted driving the marquee issue of his tenure as secretary.

Federal statistics show that 5,474 people died and an estimated 448,000 were injured in 2009 in crashes in which distracted driving played a role. Research has shown that drivers using hand-held devices are four times more likely to get into a serious crash, and that hands-free cellphones aren’t much safer because just talking on the phone reduces the brain power focused on driving by 37 percent.

The new federal guidelines, published Thursday in the Federal Register and subject to a 60-day period of public comment, recommend that manufacturers make it impossible for drivers to perform many functions while a vehicle is in motion, including: to send or look at text messages; browse the Internet; tweet or use social media such as Facebook; enter information in navigation systems; enter 10-digit phone numbers; or receive any type of text information of more than 30 characters unrelated to driving.

“The devil’s in the details,” said Robert Strassburger, vice president for vehicle safety at the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, as he awaited release of the 177-page guidelines.

But Strassburger said automakers have been eager to add distracted-driving safety features to electronic devices they install in vehicles. He said the industry is committed to “the two-second rule.”

“Basically, any task behind the wheel that takes more than two seconds to complete or can’t be completed in a couple of brief chunks would be locked out or would be prohibited,” Strassburger said.

His alliance put out a formal statement in advance of the release of the guidelines, pointing out that the industry has been working under an evolving set of self-imposed electronics guidelines for a decade.

“This is a case of automakers getting caught doing something right,” the statement said.

It said the industry has sought to balance consumer demand with safety.

“Consumers expect to have access to new technology, so integrating and adapting this technology to enable safe driving is the solution,” the alliance said in the statement.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) will hold hearings on the proposed guidelines next month in Washington, Chicago and Los Angeles.

Under the guidelines, passenger use of electronic devices would not be restricted, although no one could enter a new address in a factory-installed GPS unit unless the vehicle was stopped.

“GPS is a technology that supports the driver,” said NHTSA Administrator David Strickland. “Remember, before GPS, what were people doing? Holding up maps with one hand and trying to look at a map while trying to drive. We think that is a much more dangerous situation.”

Technology has been developed by several private companies that would allow car makers to restrict driver use of electronics. Strickland said his agency had not determined how much it would cost to add those features on factory-installed devices.

Many new vehicles already come with restricted electronic equipment, such as navigation devices that won’t allow a driver to enter a destination unless the car is stopped.

Barbara Harsha, executive director of the the Governors Highway Safety Association, a coalition of state safety officials, called the guidelines a good first step.

“DOT is on the right path,” Harsha said. “We particularly like the guideline for disabling devices that text and surf the Internet.”

The federal government has the authority to issue safety guidelines or mandates for auto manufacturers. If the guidelines were to apply to non-factory items — smartphones, tablets or other devices — it would fall to state governments to impose any restrictions.

LaHood has used the bully pulpit to get states to pass laws restricting cellphone calls and text messaging, and in the past federal authorities have imposed their will on issues like blood-alcohol levels and seat belts by threatening to withhold federal funds from non-compliant states.

“It gives the states that haven’t passed laws yet the momentum,” LaHood said.



MB_722

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11173
  • RIP Keith
what if there's kids/passengers in the back who have a ps vita or tablet/phone and it keeps them occupied while driving?


Hugo Chavez

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31865
what if there's kids/passengers in the back who have a ps vita or tablet/phone and it keeps them occupied while driving?


don't ask the government to think logically... it's not possible lol...