Author Topic: Verizon Jumps in on the early notices about health care costs  (Read 1786 times)

Colossus_500

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3993
  • Psalm 139
ObamaCare Day One
Companies are already warning about higher health-care costs.
opinionjournal.com

Democrats dragged themselves over the health-care finish line in part by repeating that voters would like the plan once it passed. Let's see what they think when they learn their insurance costs will jump right away.

Even before President Obama signed the bill on Tuesday, Caterpillar said it would cost the company at least $100 million more in the first year alone. Medical device maker Medtronic warned that new taxes on its products could force it to lay off a thousand workers. Now Verizon joins the roll of businesses staring at adverse consequences.

In an email titled "President Obama Signs Health Care Legislation" sent to all employees Tuesday night, the telecom giant warned that "we expect that Verizon's costs will increase in the short term." While executive vice president for human resources Marc Reed wrote that "it is difficult at this point to gauge the precise impact of this legislation," and that ObamaCare does reflect some of the company's policy priorities, the message to workers was clear: Expect changes for the worse to your health benefits as the direct result of this bill, and maybe as soon as this year.

Mr. Reed specifically cited a change in the tax treatment of retiree health benefits. When Congress created the Medicare prescription drug benefit in 2003, it included a modest tax subsidy to encourage employers to keep drug plans for retirees, rather than dumping them on the government. The Employee Benefit Research Institute says this exclusion—equal to 28% of the cost of a drug plan—will run taxpayers $665 per person next year, while the same Medicare coverage would cost $1,209.

In a $5.4 billion revenue grab, Democrats decided that this $665 fillip should be subject to the ordinary corporate income tax of 35%. Most consulting firms and independent analysts say the higher costs will induce some companies to drop drug coverage, which could affect about five million retirees and 3,500 businesses. Verizon and other large corporations warned about this outcome.

U.S. accounting laws also require businesses to immediately restate their earnings in light of the higher tax burden on their long-term retiree health liabilities. This will have a big effect on their 2010 earnings.

While the drug tax subsidy is for retirees, companies consider their benefit costs as a total package. The new bill might cause some to drop retiree coverage altogether. Others may be bound by labor contracts to retirees, but then they will find other ways to cut costs. This means raising costs or reducing coverage for other employees. So much for Mr. Obama's claim that if you like your coverage, you can keep it—even at Fortune 500 companies.

In its employee note, Verizon also warned about the 40% tax on high-end health plans, though that won't take effect until 2018. "Many of the plans that Verizon offers to employees and retirees are projected to have costs above the threshold in the legislation and will be subject to the 40 percent excise tax." These costs will start to show up soon, and, as we repeatedly argued, the tax is unlikely to drive down costs. The tax burden will simply be spread to all workers—the result of the White House's too-clever decision to tax insurers, rather than individuals.

A Verizon spokesman said the company is merely addressing employee questions about ObamaCare, not making a political statement. But these and many other changes were enabled by the support of the Business Roundtable that counts Verizon as a member. Verizon CEO Ivan Seidenberg's health-reform ideas are 180 degrees from Mr. Obama's, but Verizon's shareholders and 900,000 employees and retirees will still pay the price.

Businesses around the country are making the same calculations as Verizon and no doubt sending out similar messages. It's only a small measure of the destruction that will be churned out by the rewrite of health, tax, labor and welfare laws that is ObamaCare, and only the vanguard of much worse to come.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39834
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Verizon Jumps in on the early notices about health care costs
« Reply #1 on: March 25, 2010, 06:31:05 AM »
Ha ha!   We posted the same article within moments of each other. 

I just think it would be fair if those who supported this mess are laid off first like Nicky, Benny, blacken, mons etc. 

drkaje

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18182
  • Quiet, Err. I'm transmitting rage.
Re: Verizon Jumps in on the early notices about health care costs
« Reply #2 on: March 25, 2010, 06:36:47 AM »
How long until BlueCross, MVP, or someone else announces closing up shop in anticipation of this bill being signed?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39834
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Verizon Jumps in on the early notices about health care costs
« Reply #3 on: March 25, 2010, 06:38:02 AM »
How long until BlueCross, MVP, or someone else announces closing up shop in anticipation of this bill being signed?

They are not going to go out immediately.  They are going to jack up costs massively and there is abosutely nothing we can do since now we are MANDATED by law to purchase this stuff. 

FUBO! ! ! ! !

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Verizon Jumps in on the early notices about health care costs
« Reply #4 on: March 25, 2010, 06:57:29 AM »
Countdown until a dumb liberal states that this is just fear tactics by Republicans.

3.....2.....1.....

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Verizon Jumps in on the early notices about health care costs
« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2010, 06:58:31 AM »
Ha ha!   We posted the same article within moments of each other. 

I just think it would be fair if those who supported this mess are laid off first like Nicky, Benny, blacken, mons etc. 

Didn't you know, bro. Those morons are multi-billionaires. This is no sweat off their back.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39834
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Verizon Jumps in on the early notices about health care costs
« Reply #6 on: March 25, 2010, 07:04:02 AM »
Caterpillar: Health overhaul will hit earnings
Peoria Journal-Star ^ | Mar 24, 2010 | Paul Gordon


Posted on Thursday, March 25, 2010 8:48:22 AM by Graybeard58

PEORIA —

Caterpillar Inc. will feel an immediate impact - to the tune of $100 million - from the health care reform legislation, the company said Wednesday in a regulatory filing.

Caterpillar said its first-quarter earnings will be reduced by that amount because that legislation, signed into law by President Obama on Tuesday, will cause it to lose the Medicare Part D Retiree Drug Subsidy available to companies that provide their retirees with prescription drug plans.

The company told the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission about the charge because it will affect the company's bottom line in the first quarter, which ends March 31. The last official communication the company had with the SEC about finances included its 2010 outlook, in which the company said it expects a full-year profit of about $2.50 a share. It did not include the potential effect of the Medicare tax.

In the document filed with the SEC on Wednesday, Caterpillar said that even though the Medicare Part D tax deduction doesn't take effect until 2011, "Caterpillar is required to recognize the full accounting impact in its financial statements in the period in which the (Patient Protection and Affordable Care) Act is signed."

"As retiree health care liabilities and related tax impacts are already reflected in Caterpillar's financial statements, the change will result in a charge to Caterpillar's earnings in the first quarter of 2010 of approximately $100 million after tax. This charge reflects the anticipated increase in taxes that will occur as a result of the act," the company said.

The $100 million is the company's estimate of how the Medicare tax will affect it for the full year, but the entire charge must be taken in the first quarter, the company said.

Caterpillar is scheduled to report its first quarter earnings on April 26.

In a letter to employees sent out later Wednesday, Greg Folley, the company's vice president of human resources, explained the filing.

"The timing of this tax increase could not be worse. As you know, last year we faced the worst global economic conditions since the Great Depression. Now, as we are beginning to see some signs of recovery and pockets of increased demand, we are faced with this additional cost, which will not have the same impact on many of our global competitors," Folley said.

"The full extent of this tax increase - and other possible cost increases related to the law and the mandates included in it - is not yet clear. However, the new law will increase Caterpillar's cost of providing health care benefits, which is likely to have an impact on Caterpillar employees and retirees. As we move forward, we must balance our ability to remain competitive in the global marketplace with the burdens presented by new taxes and other regulations. We will keep you informed as we develop our strategies to manage these costs and health care system changes."

The law not only will "negatively affect Caterpillar's profitability in 2010," Folley said the part of the law that removes the retiree drug subsidy "substantially lessens that program and may cause companies like Caterpillar to consider changes to its retiree prescription drug benefit plans."

Caterpillar spokesman Jim Dugan said the company has not made any decisions regarding the retiree prescription drug benefits or any other medical benefits, even though Caterpillar expects more effects from the bill than just the elimination of the drug subsidy.

Dugan said the legislation itself isn't likely to affect employment or the call back of laid off workers as those are tied primarily to demand.

However, he cited Folley's letter about the company's foreign competitors not having the same health care issues. "This could affect our ability to compete globally" with competitors that don't have the same issues, he said.