Trump: I wont stop using the term "Anchor Babies"

[240 is Back]

Worse, Jeb used it when responding.  Hilary capitlized with a tweet, "They're called babies."

The repubs CANNOT win the white house without 35-40% of the hispanic vote.  Romney got 27%, I believe.

Is there ANY WAY that Trump wins the White House after promising to "export" 6% of the US population, as well as all the things he's said about Mexicans?

[polychronopolous]

Worse, Jeb used it when responding.  Hilary capitlized with a tweet, "They're called babies."

The repubs CANNOT win the white house without 35-40% of the hispanic vote.  Romney got 27%, I believe.

Is there ANY WAY that Trump wins the White House after promising to "export" 6% of the US population, as well as all the things he's said about Mexicans?

What happened 240?

I thought you were supposed to be Mr. Hardass "Deport Em All" Guy

And now that someone actually steps to the plate and proposes such an idea you are going turncoat and throwing cheap shots?

[240 is Back]

What happened 240?
I thought you were supposed to be Mr. Hardass "Deport Em All" Guy
And now that someone actually steps to the plate and proposes such an idea you are going turncoat and throwing cheap shots?

Oh, my position is much more extreme.  For a decade, I've said all illegals have 90 days to exit, go anywhere they want.

Then you give rewards for those who snitch on illegals, and fine those who house/employ them.  De-incentive.

Then, once we catch one, we should break their right kneecap and drop them at the southernmost tip of south america.  IF by some miracle they're able to make it ALL THE WAY back to the border, we'll notice them quickly due to the limp the second time.

That being said, I'm not running for prez with my cruel and unrealistic solution.  Trump seems like he's going out of his way to disrespect/demonize 6% in order to rile up the other 94%.   I haven't see that used since, uh, 1939 I believe...

[polychronopolous]

Oh, my position is much more extreme.  For a decade, I've said all illegals have 90 days to exit, go anywhere they want.

Then you give rewards for those who snitch on illegals, and fine those who house/employ them.  De-incentive.

Then, once we catch one, we should break their right kneecap and drop them at the southernmost tip of south america.  IF by some miracle they're able to make it ALL THE WAY back to the border, we'll notice them quickly due to the limp the second time.

That being said, I'm not running for prez with my cruel and unrealistic solution.  Trump seems like he's going out of his way to disrespect/demonize 6% in order to rile up the other 94%.   I haven't see that used since, uh, 1939 I believe...

Ah, the classic Jon Stewart angle.

Get presented with a legit question and respond with a really poor attempt at humor which does zero to tangibly resolve the problem at hand.

In this forum the adults are speaking.

Maybe you can join us one day.

[240 is Back]

Ah, the classic Jon Stewart angle.

Get presented with a legit question and respond with a really poor attempt at humor which does zero to tangibly resolve the problem at hand.

In this forum the adults are speaking.

Maybe you can join us one day.

no, i'm serious - I've advocated de-incentivizing it for years now.  Dry up the $.   

I doubt trump really wants to do what he's saying - he just wants to win the election. 

If he truly meant to kick out 6% of the population, he'd run, win, then pop it on those who put him into office.

[Novena]

   I haven't see that used since, uh, 1939 I believe...

The election that brought the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (Nazi) to power happened in 1933...1939 was the year of the start of WWII.

[JOHN MATRIX]

Trump's immigration details that he released, and this latest about stopping the Anchor Baby deluge, is the best thing to happen to the country in a long time. it is HUGE because one, we FINALLY have someone making a bold, clear stand for reason for once, and two, because it is ACTUALLY GETTING TRACTION.

the American people -despite the MSM trying so hard to deny it-supports this stuff. it makes sense from a legal standpoint, a national security/patriotic standpoint, and is essentially common sense. the opponents are starting to sweat because they know the facts are not with them. the law is not with them. all they can bring is Emotion, nothing else.

Mark my words, if Trump is able to actually get this stuff going for real and real changes are FINALLY made, this will go down as a landmark turning point for America and will be remembered/studied with admiration by future generations of Americans.

[240 is Back]

TRUMP USED MY BADASS IDEA TONIGHT!!!!!!!!!!!  Drop them very very far away to make sure they don't come right back!

Oh, my position is much more extreme.  For a decade, I've said all illegals have 90 days to exit, go anywhere they want.

Then you give rewards for those who snitch on illegals, and fine those who house/employ them.  De-incentive.

Then, once we catch one, we should break their right kneecap and drop them at the southernmost tip of south america.  IF by some miracle they're able to make it ALL THE WAY back to the border, we'll notice them quickly due to the limp the second time.

That being said, I'm not running for prez with my cruel and unrealistic solution.  Trump seems like he's going out of his way to disrespect/demonize 6% in order to rile up the other 94%.   I haven't see that used since, uh, 1939 I believe...

[240 is Back]

Mark my words, if Trump is able to actually get this stuff going for real and real changes are FINALLY made, this will go down as a landmark turning point for America and will be remembered/studied with admiration by future generations of Americans.

Tonight, Trump was very VAGUE about exactly who gets deported.

He's all gung ho about kicking out the real criminals - and he also said the expired visas have to leave too.  That's huge.  That doesn't tell us who else is leaving.  That's kinda a big deal.  I hope he clarifies.