Author Topic: Paco vs Atwood  (Read 8270 times)

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #25 on: July 24, 2010, 12:14:20 PM »
Paco looks like De Mayo with a very wide waist, and poor quad shape (compared to De Mayo), pity he can do zero bout his waist, really a perfect square, no taper

Atwood actually had great shape and taper in his younger days, a real freak. Ever seen hams like that? Much like Haney, a huge chest, but in relaxed poses appears very droopy

LatsMcGee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7464
  • Getbig!
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #26 on: July 24, 2010, 12:31:54 PM »
Paco has worse shape,  Atwood is a fucking narc who can't go two weeks without tearing a muscle but will still say he doesn't believe in overtraining,  some folks never learn. 

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #27 on: July 24, 2010, 12:32:37 PM »
2 great role models of what can be achieved through hard work and dedication.

giving natural bbers everywhere inspiration!

affeman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16144
  • The US is the laughingstock of the entire world.
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #28 on: July 24, 2010, 12:47:06 PM »
2 great role models of what can be achieved through hard work and dedication.

giving natural bbers everywhere inspiration!

2 great role models of that drugs can't create a champion.

I wasn't familiar with that Atwood guy, but that guy looks HORRIBLE. Not one bodypart fits to another.


BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19674
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #29 on: July 24, 2010, 12:56:10 PM »
This pic has to be photoshopped. I do not believe anyone owns or would wear posing trunks that look like this!  :-\

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #30 on: July 24, 2010, 01:55:29 PM »
This pic has to be photoshopped. I do not believe anyone owns or would wear posing trunks that look like this!  :-\
Looks like he got the short end of the stick BAY.

arce1988

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
  • ARCE USA USMC
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #31 on: July 24, 2010, 02:50:21 PM »
  Disgusting. ALL PED.

Immortal_Technique

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2196
  • "It's all a bunch of shit, I say fuck it" - DF
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #32 on: July 24, 2010, 03:25:09 PM »
I really think Paco looks a lot better structurally. His arms and legs are actually big enough to start balancing out his unfortunately large waist. Atwood's arms and quads are both too small, insane hams and back though, he is quite a-symmetrical from left to right, abs much weirder and worse than Paco, droopier oversized tits than Paco. Paco looks great in a number of poses, Atwood only looks remotely bearable in back poses. I can see everyone's hoping to annoy Kyomu however haha.

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #33 on: July 24, 2010, 03:38:10 PM »
Looks like he got the short end of the stick BAY.
Unfortunately, all his bodyparts look like they don't belong, including that one.

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #34 on: July 24, 2010, 03:55:47 PM »
Unfortunately, all his bodyparts look like they don't belong, including that one.
;D

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19674
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #35 on: July 24, 2010, 09:14:51 PM »
Looks like he got the short end of the stick BAY.

Maybe, but that area of the photo looks photoshopped.  No one has a thong/trunks that look like that!  :(

JBGRAY

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2038
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #36 on: July 25, 2010, 02:14:24 AM »
They brought the freaky to the show, and thats what people liked to see.  Something different.  Size and conditioning should be rewarded more than "pleasing to the eye."  Bodybuilding is a freakshow, not who would look best at the beach.  A pro physique should make women recoil in horror and scream in terror.

closeline

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1674
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #37 on: July 25, 2010, 02:24:21 AM »
That conditioning is just unbelieveable. Seriously, I think that guy has surpassed Munzer when it comes to being shredded and dry.



you re wrong, paco is shredded but not that defined, if you know what i mean

paco, atwood, james = all have a unbeliveable bad structure

kefelianos has bad proportions baut the best muscle quality of todays pros (reminds me of the 90s class)

Figo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8101
Re: Paco vs Atwood
« Reply #38 on: July 25, 2010, 03:12:00 AM »