Author Topic: Has the lack of a truly dominant Winner made the contest more open?  (Read 485 times)

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
I've been wondering if the the lack of a truly dominant Mr. O winner has made the contest more open and that the quality, although not on the level of the 90s, has improved, and made it so that there are more top unknowns than in previous yrs. Back with Ronnie and Dorian reigns, we knew the deal, barring them trully messing up prep, they were going to win. Now, you have Vic, Jay, Phil, Dex, Kai, even guys like Roelly being truly impressive...you can't count them out...

Master Blaster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6610
  • Not sure if getbig full of trolls or trolls getbig
Re: Has the lack of a truly dominant Winner made the contest more open?
« Reply #1 on: September 24, 2010, 04:40:41 PM »
I've been wondering if the the lack of a truly dominant Mr. O winner has made the contest more open and that the quality, although not on the level of the 90s, has improved, and made it so that there are more top unknowns than in previous yrs. Back with Ronnie and Dorian reigns, we knew the deal, barring them trully messing up prep, they were going to win. Now, you have Vic, Jay, Phil, Dex, Kai, even guys like Roelly being truly impressive...you can't count them out...

Um...did you see Jay last year?

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: Has the lack of a truly dominant Winner made the contest more open?
« Reply #2 on: September 24, 2010, 05:38:58 PM »
Um...did you see Jay last year?
I said a truly dominant Mr. O, he was good from the front, shitty from the back, as usual...