Author Topic: 2010 Olympia - Phil Heath should of won!  (Read 18547 times)

mass243

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12873
  • On right side of the history!
Re: Heath should have won
« Reply #100 on: September 26, 2010, 04:28:44 AM »
SURE 100% HE SHOULD BE THE WINNER, BUT WHAT TO DO, THIS THE JUDGES POLITICS.

Sure it is  ::)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83671
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Heath should have won
« Reply #101 on: September 26, 2010, 04:32:06 AM »
Agreed 1,000,000%  The funny thing is the only reasons I've heard that Jay is better is because he is wider.....When was being wide part of the judging criteria?  Phil no longer has the narrow look to him except when he does his rear double bi....slightly.

Phil Destroys Jay from the back except in hams and rear lat spread....Phil destroys Jay in back double bi, I mean absolutely destroys him.
Jay should not have won.  He wasn't given a gift but he should count his lucky stars and retire.

Jay won because he is much bigger than Phil and wider to boot , Phil does certainly look better than Jay in some poses but Jay collected more , Phil looks narrow next to Jay maybe not so much standing alone

the funny part is Jay wont retire watch , he'll be back for number 5 who can defeat him? a much improved Wolf? how long is that gonna take? Vic Martinez?  :-\ Kai Green dead on probably has the best chance to beat Jay he's honestly Jay's biggest threat

MB

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2312
Re: 2010 Olympia - Phil Heath should of won!
« Reply #102 on: September 26, 2010, 11:42:47 AM »
Bob said Jay would lose if he showed up the same as last year.  Jay was worse than last year and still won. 

tendonitis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4595
Re: 2010 Olympia - Phil Heath should of won!
« Reply #103 on: September 26, 2010, 11:44:06 AM »
.