Author Topic: Bigger isnt always Better..  (Read 13396 times)

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #75 on: November 08, 2010, 04:34:18 AM »
People can't help that they are short. Why not get jacked, whats wrong with working out to get bigger muscles? How is it a lost cause if they enjoy the way their physique looks? Do you only work out because of what chicks/other guys will think?  
I realized long ago, that I don't got the genetics to be a bodybuilder, I'd look like shit in a thong. I work out for personal health and happiness, I'd give up weights before I'd ever give up cardio. I'm tall though so this shit is just silly. I'm not huge in the least but no one I know even lifts, and we all know I'm the biggest person they know.

There's nothing wrong with being short, but it's the confusing message people try to promote. Size don't matter(mostly true), but then they try to confuse a bitch by spending a hour a day trying to "getbig". Fuck that'd be like me saying spelling ability don't matter and trying to get everyone on here to read my book.

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #76 on: November 08, 2010, 04:43:43 AM »
I guess I just look at it from an aesthetic point of view, a short untrained physique vs a jacked short physique.. Is it compensating? I don't really think so, not if you think muscles look better than flab
My guess is norjway don't get anymore sun than newfoundland, how do people even know unless you've already dipped your wick in them. This is the stupid shit sites like this get you thinking about.
"how do I look in a thong"
"is my taper v perfect"
"is my bf too high"

It's stupid shit, in the real world your either fat or your not, lets not complicate this shit with BF percentage, and all this garbage, its utter nonsense.  Point is if I met you in real life I'd be way more impressed with the languages you know that'd what you'd ever look like naked.

Captain Equipoise

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12927
  • back from the dead...
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #77 on: November 08, 2010, 04:56:54 AM »
That guy represents everything that should be bodybuilding...


Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #78 on: November 08, 2010, 04:57:51 AM »
Yeah I agree, most of getbig are way too focused on their appearance. Thats just how it is on bodybuilding boards. I don't think about how I look in a thong to or my v taper, just about making small improvements and looking better
Meh you can't tell me you notice shit, that you never would without GB. My hip to waist ratio bothered me alot for a while. Than I noticed DW, and realized at my height a taper is fucking rare. This shit wouldn't even cross my mind without this site.

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #79 on: November 08, 2010, 05:04:33 AM »
True, but we're kinda drifting away from the point. Which is, if you're short and wanna look better - for whatever reason -  then why shouldn't you
Depends if it's just the part of your daily fitness routine why not. But if your considering getting on gear, or sacrificing any time or happiness it's a fucking waste. Just look at Adonis, the amount of time he spends obsessing over food, just so he can look fit.

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #80 on: November 08, 2010, 05:14:01 AM »
So you think its somehow more justifiable to spend lots of time on working out and nutrition if you are a monster? And he isn't a short guy so I don't see the relevance  ???
It's not about height it's about goals. If you wanna be a fitness model or look like a fitness model you gotta have the shape and face for it. And if you do have those go full steam ahead. However if you don't got it, don't bother trying to get it, your just wasting time, and effort that could better spent elsewhere. It's like an old guy trying to be young, it's better to be a good looking old guy than an old guy trying to look young. Or a good looking short guy, than a short guy trying to look big.

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #81 on: November 08, 2010, 05:16:47 AM »
Making this a little less cryptic focusing on your weakness instead of focusing on your strength just makes you even weaker. Let's pretend it's arnie against, Al pachino, would it make sense for him to spend a year working out and doing a bunch of cycles so he don't look so small when he co stars with arnie, or should he spend a year learning the script so he can act him out of the water.

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #82 on: November 08, 2010, 05:21:56 AM »
So where does the limit go for a short guy in terms of size before you find it stupid??
Depends does he have anything else to offer? It's about knowing to know when to cut your loss's and moving on to something else. I.E. If your under 5 10-11 for the love of god don't ever juice.

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #83 on: November 08, 2010, 05:49:43 AM »
Most of the olympia lineup is under 5'10-11"  ???
And to ordinary people there just a bunch of dwarf freaks. Your just proving my point. This forum has warped your mind into thinking they don't look like retards.

Lundgren

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 4441
  • Banned
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #84 on: November 08, 2010, 06:07:28 AM »
I think they are way too big, as in I'd never like to look like that, but fact remains short bodybuilders fill out easier and around 5'9" seems to be the best height for bodybuilders? Don't you agree? Do you mean short guys should stick to fitness or something?
First off the IFBB should just die. Second it depends on the look your going for. If you live on a beach or land of the nords etc. If you got anyother things going for you(education languages music etc.

dj181

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 27878
  • Dog sees 🐿️
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #85 on: November 08, 2010, 06:28:18 AM »
True dat! 5'6" to 5'9" is da best height for bodybuilding

gh15

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16991
  • angels
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #86 on: November 08, 2010, 08:24:23 AM »
what makes you think he is natural? id love hearing this,,because he is petite and small?,, itold you before there are special cases where picture is hard to determine ,,this is one of those cases,,but! gh in low doses and the use of letro put with good oxandrolone/turinabol/winstrol/primobolan can result in this exact physiqe in those pictures,,in this case due to not known height and very misleading pictures since no one around its gonna have to be jusdged in real life or with more pictures,, in any case its a lower dose fella if uses and the most important thing for him is his dryness so he is LOADED ON RESEARCH PRODUCT if a user

gh15 approved
fallen angel

MuscleMcMannus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6236
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #87 on: November 08, 2010, 01:36:56 PM »
what makes you think he is natural? id love hearing this,,because he is petite and small?,, itold you before there are special cases where picture is hard to determine ,,this is one of those cases,,but! gh in low doses and the use of letro put with good oxandrolone/turinabol/winstrol/primobolan can result in this exact physiqe in those pictures,,in this case due to not known height and very misleading pictures since no one around its gonna have to be jusdged in real life or with more pictures,, in any case its a lower dose fella if uses and the most important thing for him is his dryness so he is LOADED ON RESEARCH PRODUCT if a user

gh15 approved

Yeah I didn't even comment on his natural status because he's not.  LMAO!  He's a tiny tit steroid user who is in excellent condition.  Leave it to getbiggers who live in fantasy land to bust a nut over some guy like that.  LOL. 

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #88 on: November 08, 2010, 02:24:20 PM »
I showed 5 of my girlfriends this picture and the unanimous result was "gross" he looks like a roided out freak.  Even when I told them he only weighed about 140lbs they all said he was too lean and were not attracted to the physique.

Fucking women.

MuscleMcMannus

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6236
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #89 on: November 08, 2010, 02:26:59 PM »
I showed 5 of my girlfriends this picture and the unanimous result was "gross" he looks like a roided out freak.  Even when I told them he only weighed about 140lbs they all said he was too lean and were not attracted to the physique.

Fucking women.

Dumb hoes.  Ask them what they think of this pic? 

dustin

  • Guest
Re: Bigger isnt always Better..
« Reply #90 on: November 08, 2010, 03:10:01 PM »
People can't help that they are short. Why not get jacked, whats wrong with working out to get bigger muscles? How is it a lost cause if they enjoy the way their physique looks? Do you only work out because of what chicks/other guys will think? 

Exactly. Midget or not, he's jacked. Can't call him a tiny tit.