Author Topic: San Francisco bans Happy Meals  (Read 599 times)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66447
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
San Francisco bans Happy Meals
« on: November 06, 2010, 08:35:16 AM »
Just plain ridiculous. 

San Francisco bans Happy Meals
The city's board of supervisors votes to forbid restaurants from giving away toys with meals that have high levels of calories, sugar and fat.
November 02, 2010|By Sharon Bernstein, Los Angeles Times

San Francisco's board of supervisors has voted, by a veto-proof margin, to ban most of McDonald's Happy Meals as they are now served in the restaurants.

The measure will make San Francisco the first major city in the country to forbid restaurants from offering a free toy with meals that contain more than set levels of calories, sugar and fat.

The ordinance would also require restaurants to provide fruits and vegetables with all meals for children that come with toys.

"We're part of a movement that is moving forward an agenda of food justice," said Supervisor Eric Mar, who sponsored the measure. "From San Francisco to New York City, the epidemic of childhood obesity in this country is making our kids sick, particularly kids from low income neighborhoods, at an alarming rate. It's a survival issue and a day-to-day issue."

Just after the vote, McDonald's spokeswoman Danya Proud said, "We are extremely disappointed with today's decision. It's not what our customers want, nor is it something they asked for."

The ban, already enacted in a similar measure by Santa Clara County, was opposed by San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom, who was vying to be lieutenant governor in Tuesday's election. But because the measure was passed by eight votes — one more than needed to override a veto — his opposition doesn't matter unless one of the supervisors changes his or her mind after the promised veto.

Under the ordinance, scheduled to take effect in December 2011, restaurants may include a toy with a meal if the food and drink combined contain fewer than 600 calories, and if less than 35% of the calories come from fat.

Over the last few weeks, the proposed ban caused a stir online and on cable television, with supporters arguing that it would help protect children from obesity, and opponents seeing it as the latest example of the nanny state gone wild.

Supervisor Bevan Dufty, whose swing vote provided the veto-proof majority, said critics should not dismiss the legislation as a nutty effort by San Franciscans. "I do believe the industry is going to take note of this. I don't care how much they say, 'It's San Francisco, they're wacked out there.' "

Proud, the McDonald's spokeswoman, said the city was out of step with the mainstream on the issue.

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/nov/02/business/la-fi-happy-meals-20101103

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: San Francisco bans Happy Meals
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2010, 08:50:20 AM »
I hope Cali burns to the ground and is left in ruins and the other states build 40 foot walls to keep those idiots stuck in the red tape hell they created. 


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: San Francisco bans Happy Meals
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2010, 09:06:29 AM »
those toys buy parents a whole lotta peace and quiet during meals.


Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: San Francisco bans Happy Meals
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2010, 09:07:27 AM »
I hope Cali burns to the ground and is left in ruins and the other states build 40 foot walls to keep those idiots stuck in the red tape hell they created. 

do the world a favor and get back on your meds

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: San Francisco bans Happy Meals
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2010, 12:44:51 PM »
do the world a favor and get back on your meds

Ha ha ha-  I cant wait till your stupid ass state has to declare Chapter 7,  not 11, due to businesses racing out of Cali due to its moronic citizens.   

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66447
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: San Francisco bans Happy Meals
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2010, 06:12:07 AM »
Mayor vetoes San Francisco ban on Happy Meals with toys
By Michael Martinez, CNN
November 12, 2010

(CNN) -- San Francisco, California, Mayor Gavin Newsom vetoed Friday the city's ban on most McDonald's Happy Meals with toys.

In making the veto, the mayor released a new report on how a public-private partnership is combating childhood obesity and how San Francisco's more than 55,000 public school students are now eating fresher and healthier foods.

"Parents, not politicians, should decide what their children eat, especially when it comes to spending their own money," said Newsom. "Despite its good intentions, I cannot support this unwise and unprecedented governmental intrusion into parental responsibilities and private choices."

Under a partnership with the private sector, the local government has been remedying the root causes of obesity, Newsom said.

Since the city launched its "Shape Up San Francisco" program in 2006, the city has received state funds to expand physical exercise for schoolchildren, put gardens in schools, delineate safe school routes to walk and bike to school, and educate kids about making healthy choices, Newsom said.

His spokesman added the mayor is looking for the Board of Supervisors not to override his veto, even though eight of its 11 members had voted for the ban.

"He hopes some members will reconsider should it be put up for an override," said spokesman Tony Winnicker. "One of the eight is not entirely comfortable with it and some of them are getting heat as this thing is being mocked around the world."

The mayor, he said, is "doing what he thinks is the right thing."

Supervisor Eric Mar, who sponsored the legislation, predicted an override.

"I am surprised that Mayor Newsom plans to veto the Healthy Meal Legislation, given his consistent support of healthy eating and active living through his sponsorship of programs like Shape Up San Francisco, Sunday Streets, and Soda Free Summers," Mar said before the veto.

He said he applauds the mayor's work to combat childhood obesity "through increasing access to healthy food and promoting physical activity. However, as a city, we need to do more."

"The dollars spent by the fast-food industry far outnumber any resources that we as a city could spend on outreach and education. Southeast San Francisco is a food desert, where fast-food restaurants are abundant and fresh produce is scarce. No amount of physical activity can undo the harms of unhealthy eating," Mar said.

"From the Institutes of Medicine to the World Health Organization, we know that reducing the consumption of junk food by kids could spare the health of millions and save billions of dollars to our overstrapped public health system. That's why pediatricians, educators, parents, community health advocates, and thousands of individuals lined up to support this ordinance," he added.

The Board of Supervisors approved the ban on Tuesday. The ordinance requires McDonald's Happy Meals and other fast-food servings that come with toys to meet new nutritional standards.

Newsom, elected last week to be the state's lieutenant governor, had indicated he would veto the proposal before leaving for his new job.
The bill, which San Francisco officials hope other cities will adopt in battling a child obesity epidemic, was a defeat for McDonald's, which led the fight against the measure.

"As previously stated, we are extremely disappointed with this decision. It's not what our customers want, nor is it something they asked for," said McDonald's spokeswoman Danya Proud after the board voted.

The proposal addresses how toys and other marketing freebies entice children to buy fast-food meals that are high in fat and calories, Mar said. He initiated the proposal because his fifth-grade daughter is in the 6-to-11 age group that has seen obesity rates quadruple over the past 30 years, the same time that the Happy Meal has been on the market.

"This is a simple and modest policy that holds fast-food accountable," he said.

Before Tuesday's vote, Mar cited a study released this week by Yale University's Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, which examined 12 popular restaurant chains and found only 12 out of more than 3,000 kids' meal combinations met the nutritional guidelines for preschool-age children.

The study said that the fast-food industry spent $4.2 billion on advertising in 2009, that 40 percent of preschool-age children ask to go to McDonald's on a weekly basis, and that 15 percent ask on a daily basis. Also, 84 percent of parents say they've taken their children to eat fast food at least once in the past week.

Under the law, McDonald's and other restaurants would have until December 2011 to improve their meals' nutrition by adding fruits and vegetables -- if the chains want to keep offering toys, including those promoting the latest films.

The food and beverages would have to contain fewer than 600 calories, and less than 35 percent of the total calories would be allowed to come from fat. The meal would have to contain half a cup of fruit and three-fourths a cup of vegetables, and offer less than 640 milligrams of sodium and less than 0.5 milligrams of trans fat. Breakfast would have the option of offering half cups of fruit or vegetables.
City officials said they expect a legal challenge from McDonald's, which declined to comment on possible legal action.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/11/12/california.fast.food.ban/index.html?hpt=T2

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
Re: San Francisco bans Happy Meals
« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2010, 06:52:23 AM »
 ::)

Food justice and concern for the wellbeing of children in a city where two thirds of the residents are on drugs,  sexually explicit homoerotic behavior in public is encouraged and the authorities don't enforce immigration laws.

It seems perfectly logical that Happy Meals should be banned for the good of the public.

Arnold jr

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7247
  • fleshandiron.com
Re: San Francisco bans Happy Meals
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2010, 08:28:05 AM »
Glad to see this got vetoed.

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: San Francisco bans Happy Meals
« Reply #8 on: November 13, 2010, 08:31:11 AM »
Actually I am in shock it did.  Next they will try what NYC did with salt.

Arnold jr

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7247
  • fleshandiron.com
Re: San Francisco bans Happy Meals
« Reply #9 on: November 13, 2010, 08:42:52 AM »
Actually I am in shock it did.  Next they will try what NYC did with salt.

I am too, you're always surprised when something that makes sense happens in CA, lol! The NYC salt thing blows my mind. Does anyone know whatever happened with that restaurant "The Chip Shop" in Brooklyn? They were the ones who were told they couldn't serve their cherry pie any more because it had too much fat...did that stick? I had heard that at one point it was going to be shut down...hope not, I like the double fried cherry pie when I'm up that way and gonna be pissed off if I can't get it.

w8m8

  • Guest
Re: San Francisco bans Happy Meals
« Reply #10 on: November 13, 2010, 09:44:48 AM »
It's total bollocks that any legislation is wasted on things like this .... it does NO harm to take a kid to McDonalds for a treat of getting a Happy Meal and playing in the areas built for them to enjoy

Sure if it's their main source of diet it's not cool ... but ffs .. teach adults and children the proper needs and how to prepare good meals they can afford ... taking away affordable easy options does nothing to solve problems .. it just forces them to find other ways to get by

The premise that the toys make it overly attractive/tempting is nonsense ... it's because too many irresponsible parents look for alternatives .... after working all day it's pretty easy to put the kidlets in the car and take to Mickey D's for dinner

It would take no more than putting a good source in the local newspapers that detail quick healthy affordable alternatives and add some coupons for the ingredients .. I think that would be a better use of the resources available that they use to get this kind of shit passed