Author Topic: Democratic Party in disarray  (Read 301 times)

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Democratic Party in disarray
« on: November 19, 2010, 05:45:44 AM »
Cracks are showing within the Democratic Party. When it comes to extending the Bush tax cuts, the Democratic has never been more divided within the last 4 years:


Democratic leaders have been struggling to figure out what to do about the tax cuts for some time. And some grumbled about a lack of direction from the White House. But after a meeting with the president at the White house this morning, one Democratic leader said President Obama will let lawmakers take the lead.

"Well, the White House is acknowledging the obvious," said Senator Richard Durbin of Illinois, a member of the Democratic leadership. "The decision is going to be made by Congress and it's going to be made during the course of negotiation."It is not clear how much negotiating room Democratic leaders have. They've been forced to repeatedly postpone votes because they faced a revolt in their own ranks. Too many Democrats in both houses sided with Republicans, saying they wanted to extend all the tax cuts, at least temporarily.

Senator Ben Nelson (D-NE) said today there are still a lot of Democrats who think all tax cuts should be extended.

But Reid seems determined to go ahead anyway, a move that brought this response from Senator McConnell: "The deadline to prevent a tax hike on every American taxpayer is January 1, and the clock is ticking."

"While some in Congress have a strange desire to raise taxes on hundreds of thousands of small businesses across the country, Republicans and a growing chorus of Democrats believe that no one should have the government take even more out of their paycheck next year," McConnell added.


Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Democratic Party in disarray
« Reply #1 on: November 19, 2010, 06:30:24 AM »
The article at Politico is priceless. 


These idiots are tilldluded into believing most of the public likes their control-freak policies, marxist/communist eonomic plans, etc etc. 

I hope Obama/Marx/Lenin/Holder/Sunstein/Holdren/Napolitano keep this shit up.  2012 will be even bigger than 2010.   

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Democratic Party in disarray
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2010, 07:02:14 AM »
Obama's Democrats in disarray over expiring tax cuts
 Fri, Nov 19 2010
By Thomas Ferraro and Kim Dixon

________________________ ________________________ _____


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama's fellow Democrats in the U.S. Congress, many upset with him for election losses, are in disarray over what to do about tax cuts for millions of Americans that are set to expire on December 31.

With time running out and high political and economic stakes, Obama is pushing Democratic leaders to determine if they can win an acceptable extension of the cuts, which he could sign into law.

Resurgent Republicans are demanding that all the tax cuts be renewed, including those for wealthier Americans -- individuals making more than $200,000 and families above$250,000.

Obama favors renewing the tax cuts only for those at or below those level, saying the nation cannot afford to renew them for wealthier Americans.

Despite a number of options -- including renewing all tax cuts or only those for the middle class or tying any extension to a renewal of jobless benefits -- there is no indication a consensus is near.

"How the hell should we know when we will figure this out?" said a senior Senate Democratic aide. "This is the Democratic Party," long known for internal struggles and diverse views.

"It seems like no one is on the same page," said Chris Krueger of MF Global, a private firm that tracks Washington for investors. "It has the potential to be a train wreck."

With some Democrats blaming Obama for their loss of control of the House in the November 2 elections, Obama's ability to rally his troops is being tested on the expiring tax cuts, which were signed into law by Republican President George W. Bush.

"A lot of our guys, the progressives, don't want to extend these tax cuts for anyone," said a senior House Democratic aide. "They never liked them in the first place."

The aide said some Democrats are now wary of Obama, who convinced them to overhaul the U.S. healthcare system -- a landmark achievement that backfired and hurt them with voters.


"Our guys aren't sure what comes next. Will Obama help them in 2012, or will just be focused on getting himself re-elected?" the aide said.

OPEN TO COMPROMISE

Obama and some Democrats have made clear since the election that they are open to compromise. Options include raising the thresholds to $500,000 or even $1 million or extending the tax breaks for only a year or two before a permanent agreement can be put in place.

House and Senate Democratic leaders plan to hold votes in December on extending the tax cuts and -- barring any deal -- it will be only for middle-income Americans.

However, such a move does not now have the votes to pass the Senate where Democrats would need Republican support to clear procedural hurdles in the 100-member chamber.

"There is a reality here that while it might be best to continue the middle-class tax cuts and raise taxes on higher income people, the votes are not there to do that," said Senator Joe Lieberman, an independent who normally votes with the Democrats.

Republicans are more united than the Democrats, arguing that tax hikes, even for the wealthy, will hurt job creation. The party also has the benefit of knowing it will be in the majority in the House of Representatives as of January following this month's election results.

Liberals say Democrats are understating their negotiating power, citing polls that show most Americans favor their position.

"In general the Democrats should have the upper hand in this debate," said Jim Kessler, vice president of Third Way, a moderate Democratic think tank.

"The president ultimately is the person who will decide what he will and will not sign and that is a very strong leverage point." Kessler said.

"At the same time, Republicans have a completely unified position and, from what I can read, there are six different Democratic positions."

(Additional reporting by Donna Smith, Kim Dixon and Caren Bohan; editing by Chris Wilson)

________________________ ________________________ ___________


PROGRESSIVE = COMMUNIST