1st Terrorist in civilian court in NYC cleared of MURDER charges. WE TOLD YOU!

[tu_holmes]

Do we believe that the Military personnel would use the a different standard for legality?

Where is the outrage against the jury? They are the ones who found him not guilty correct? I am very confused by how we are saying we have a great justice system, but yet when we don't get what we want out of it, then it must be shit.

Do you believe in our Justice system or not?

[Soul Crusher]

Do we believe that the Military personnel would use the a different standard for legality?

Where is the outrage against the jury? They are the ones who found him not guilty correct? I am very confused by how we are saying we have a great justice system, but yet when we don't get what we want out of it, then it must be shit.

Do you believe in our Justice system or not?

Did you read anything in this thread? 

Soldiers on the battlefield did not captyure these terrorists using criminal procedures used in civlian court rooms.   This is so basic and so obvious, I cant even believe we are discussing this.   

[George Whorewell]

Do we believe that the Military personnel would use the a different standard for legality?

Where is the outrage against the jury? They are the ones who found him not guilty correct? I am very confused by how we are saying we have a great justice system, but yet when we don't get what we want out of it, then it must be shit.

Do you believe in our Justice system or not?

Um, retard the judge threw out a huge piece of key evidence and in the criminal justice system a single juror can force a mistrial or acquittal. That's why trying terrorists captured on the battlefield in a civilian courtroom is idiotic. The outrage is against our brilliant attorney general who forced this case into a civilian court room in the first place. Just because we have a great criminal justice system doesn't mean that every single case imaginable should be tried within its boundaries. The American Criminal Justice system that prosecutes pursesnatchers and embezzlers is not the proper forum to try international terrorists that wage war against the United States from abroad.  Hence there are military tribunals.



Hope this helps.

[Soul Crusher]

Additionally - jurors can be completely idiotic.

Look at this case.  They found him guilty of conspiracy but not the resultant acts of murder. 

Geez!  This is law 101 for fucks sake.  If you find someone guilty of conspracy for something, they by extension are guilty for all of the resultant acts of those part of the conspiracy. 

This would be like saying a co-conspirator of Lee Harvey Oswald, who gave him the gun, drove him to the School Book Depository, provided a him with a false ID would only be liable for a weapons charge and counterfeiting charge. 

Its utterly incomprehensible what Holder allowed to take place     

[Option D]

I swear you dumb, I dont like the decision. I dont.. how many times have i said that in this thread

bump

[Soul Crusher]

bump

Bump for what?  You are not educated or informed on legal issues the same as I know nothing about medical shit.

Trust myself and GW - you are clueless on the ramificatons of this.   

[Option D]

Bump for what?  You are not educated or informed on legal issues the same as I know nothing about medical shit.

Trust myself and GW - you are clueless on the ramificatons of this.   

LOL.. ok