Author Topic: Republicans putting first things first  (Read 1104 times)

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Republicans putting first things first
« on: December 01, 2010, 08:03:01 AM »
Senate Republicans Vow to Block Dem Legislation Until Tax Cuts, Budget Pass

Published December 01, 2010

Every Senate Republican has signed onto a letter vowing to block all Democratic-backed legislation until the chamber extends the Bush tax cuts and approves a spending bill to keep the government running, Fox News has learned.

Throwing down the gauntlet, all 42 members of the GOP caucus are sending the letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid warning him that they will bring matters to a standstill unless he swiftly brings those tax-and-spending issues to the floor.

That means putting on the backburner a push to repeal the military's policy banning gays from serving openly in the military, a bill giving illegal immigrant students and military members a pathway to legal status and an extension of long-term unemployment benefits.

"While there are other items that might ultimately be worthy of the Senate's attention, we cannot agree to prioritize any matters above the critical issues of funding the government and preventing a job-killing tax hike," they wrote. "Given our struggling economy, preventing the tax increase and providing economic certainty should be our top priority."

A panel of administration officials and bipartisan lawmakers is getting to work Wednesday to try to hash out a compromise over what to do about the expiring Bush tax cuts. Democrats want them extended for all but the wealthy, while Republicans want them extended for everybody.

President Obama met with top GOP and Democratic congressional leaders Tuesday but left the nitty-gritty negotiations to the panel -- he assigned Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and budget director Jacob Lew to represent the administration.

But with Republicans vowing to deprive Democrats of the 60 votes they need to move toward a vote on virtually anything until these issues are addressed, negotiators will have to move quickly if they want to get to other matters before a new, more Republican Congress is sworn in next month.

The administration is still looking to repeal the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy after the Pentagon issued a report Tuesday claiming the policy shift would not harm the military in the long-run.

Democrats also want to extend long-term jobless benefits, which expired Tuesday. A memo circulated by a GOP analyst noted that Reid so far has not been able to peel off any Republicans to support the measure to give benefits beyond 99 weeks.

The lame-duck Congress so far has approved a food safety bill, which still needs a final vote in the House, and a $4.5 billion settlement payment to black farmers and American Indians who claimed they were discriminated against by the U.S. Departments of Agriculture and Interior.

Lawmakers also passed a one-month extension of the "doc fix" that prevents cuts to Medicare approved 15 years ago from going into effect, but without action the rates paid to doctors for treating those insured by the entitlement program will plummet on Jan. 1.

It's not just Republicans who are concerned about the way the lame-duck session became a dumping ground for campaign promises and wish-list legislation.
Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., was caught on a hot mic in the Senate ripping the lame-duck agenda, which was set exclusively by his party, as "rigged" and done without a discussion among members.

Aside from the tax rates, lawmakers must pass this week a continuing resolution to keep the government functioning. Election-harried Democrats opted against producing a budget at all this year, preferring to punt questions on tax rates and spending until after Nov. 2. So, the government relies on a series of patches to keep operating. Similarly, lawmakers must vote on a supplemental appropriation to fund military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The filibuster threat increases pressure on the White House to offer a more realistic agenda for the remaining weeks of the year. For example, if Congress doesn't act on the tax cuts, it means Republicans will be in position to enact their own, retroactive plan starting Jan. 1 without having to make any concessions to Democratic demands for upper-income earners.


MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19260
  • Getbig!
Re: Republicans putting first things first
« Reply #1 on: December 01, 2010, 08:08:12 AM »
I just read about this on FoxNews.com.

This may be what Charles Krauthammer said, when he said that the GOP had de facto control of the Senate (especially now with Kirk, replacing Burris in Obama's old Senate seat).


Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: Republicans putting first things first
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2010, 11:47:45 AM »
Great to see they have their priorities in line.  More government spending is way more important than anything else.  And here I thought republicans were supposed to be the guys reigning in the evil spending democrats.  How stupid of me.

GigantorX

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6371
  • GetBig's A-Team is the Light of Truth!
Re: Republicans putting first things first
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2010, 12:00:45 PM »
Great to see they have their priorities in line.  More government spending is way more important than anything else.  And here I thought republicans were supposed to be the guys reigning in the evil spending democrats.  How stupid of me.

I don't think you understand what is going on with this situation and Republican demands. A govt. budget and tax rates are pretty big deals so get those done before any thing else is voted on.

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Republicans putting first things first
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2010, 12:05:43 PM »
Great to see they have their priorities in line.  More government spending is way more important than anything else.  And here I thought republicans were supposed to be the guys reigning in the evil spending democrats.  How stupid of me.
Yes, pretty stupid of you to think that a government can run without a clear budget. This was supposed to be done this year. Reps want to resolve the budget issue that Dems have cowardly ignored along with continuing the Bush tax cuts in order to allow businesses to have at least some sense of what type of economic environment they will be facing in coming year.

But hey, how stupid of you to not see that. Or maybe you are just more concerned with the gay soldier issue.

tu_holmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15922
  • Robot
Re: Republicans putting first things first
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2010, 12:09:13 PM »
I think it's funny how it's Dems fault the budget didn't get done last year... Last I heard, neither side wanted to talk about the damn budget and both just pointed fingers.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39865
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Republicans putting first things first
« Reply #6 on: December 01, 2010, 12:11:18 PM »
I think it's funny how it's Dems fault the budget didn't get done last year... Last I heard, neither side wanted to talk about the damn budget and both just pointed fingers.

Dems had all branches of govt - sorry TU - can't blame this one on the GOP. 

They refused to do a budget because going into the election they did not want to hand the GOP another bullet to shoot them with knowing what the deficit will be. 


dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Republicans putting first things first
« Reply #7 on: December 01, 2010, 12:45:42 PM »
I think it's funny how it's Dems fault the budget didn't get done last year... Last I heard, neither side wanted to talk about the damn budget and both just pointed fingers.

The fact that there are Dems criticizing their own party for not wanting to tackle those issues ahead of time should be sufficient for you to understand who kept pushing the can further down the road.

I think it's even funnier that Dems had the majority in both houses, but somehow Reps should bare equal blame as Dems for nothing getting done. If Dems had wanted to get it done they could have used the same tactic they used for passing that garbage called Obama care.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63969
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Republicans putting first things first
« Reply #8 on: December 01, 2010, 02:43:58 PM »
Now that's what I'm talking about.   :)

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: Republicans putting first things first
« Reply #9 on: December 01, 2010, 02:50:56 PM »
Yes, pretty stupid of you to think that a government can run without a clear budget. This was supposed to be done this year. Reps want to resolve the budget issue that Dems have cowardly ignored along with continuing the Bush tax cuts in order to allow businesses to have at least some sense of what type of economic environment they will be facing in coming year.

But hey, how stupid of you to not see that. Or maybe you are just more concerned with the gay soldier issue.

Yes, how stupid of me.  If you think Republicans want to fix the budget issue by doing what needs to be done to actually fix it, then who is the stupid one?  I've made zero posts about the DADT issue so you should squeeze harder when pulling shit out of your ass.

This move is just more grandstanding to make it seem like Repubs actually give a shit about the budget and what needs to be done to fix it, here's a reality check, they don't and it won't get fixed even with this move.  The dems had full control, they didn't fix it, Repubs didn't seem to give a shit then (most weren't making an issue of it) so now it's all of a sudden a front runner on their priority list? Please...

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: Republicans putting first things first
« Reply #10 on: December 01, 2010, 02:52:17 PM »
The fact that there are Dems criticizing their own party for not wanting to tackle those issues ahead of time should be sufficient for you to understand who kept pushing the can further down the road.

I think it's even funnier that Dems had the majority in both houses, but somehow Reps should bare equal blame as Dems for nothing getting done. If Dems had wanted to get it done they could have used the same tactic they used for passing that garbage called Obama care.

Couldn't have said it better, both sides are to blame, but Dems hold the lion share of responsibility for not getting it fixed while they had ample opportunity to do so.