Author Topic: Wide clavicles  (Read 3614 times)

KrAng

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 83
Wide clavicles
« on: September 23, 2011, 10:01:43 PM »
Should having wide clavicles be praised over big muscles and condition?
Peoples skeletal structure requires no effort or work, yet muscles and definition are reached through hard work..... So why the emphasis on "width"?

jude2

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11694
  • Getbig!
Re: Wide clavicles
« Reply #1 on: September 23, 2011, 10:05:47 PM »
Reg Park had some wide clavicles, since there has been alot of talk about him lately.

Kulutues

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 658
Re: Wide clavicles
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2011, 10:06:55 PM »
bigger = better in BBing, except for waist

KrAng

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 83
Re: Wide clavicles
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2011, 10:10:58 PM »
bigger = better in BBing, except for waist

But muscles.... Not bones.... Because jay cutlers skll is gigantic

2ND COMING

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6307
  • Might is right.
Re: Wide clavicles
« Reply #4 on: September 23, 2011, 10:34:22 PM »
Should having wide clavicles be praised over big muscles and condition?
Peoples skeletal structure requires no effort or work, yet muscles and definition are reached through hard work..... So why the emphasis on "width"?

Hi phil.

Kulutues

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 658
Re: Wide clavicles
« Reply #5 on: September 23, 2011, 10:35:33 PM »
But muscles.... Not bones.... Because jay cutlers skll is gigantic

no bones matters in BBing a lot too to make the best final product, best structure is key, aka wider shoulders the better and smaller waist the better

#1 Klaus fan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9203
Re: Wide clavicles
« Reply #6 on: September 23, 2011, 10:47:55 PM »
How much effort does a good muscle shape require? Same thing.

gib

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5114
  • Getbig!
Re: Wide clavicles
« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2011, 10:56:57 PM »
Body building is about building muscles in your body.

Clavicles are not muscles. They are bones.

Bodybuilding is muscle building, not skeleton building...

Kulutues

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 658
Re: Wide clavicles
« Reply #8 on: September 23, 2011, 11:28:04 PM »
Body building is about building muscles in your body.

Clavicles are not muscles. They are bones.

Bodybuilding is muscle building, not skeleton building...

the people with better structure will always have the better final product

NotMrAverage

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2170
  • SCHPORT
Re: Wide clavicles
« Reply #9 on: September 24, 2011, 12:41:28 AM »
Man Phil is Mr.O now but we make fun of them being wide as a pen everyday like a dozen times every day. And he reads it. Philsulina must love this board. LOL
MIRAGETROPIN

david94

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 462
Re: Wide clavicles
« Reply #10 on: September 24, 2011, 01:01:39 AM »
With his abillity to  creta muscle, Lee Priest could have been Mr Olympia. But as he has the shitiest skeleton in the IFBB and in the world of dwarfs of the the forest, he will always be invisible onstage.
Between 2 guys able to have the maximum amount of muscle possible on their structure, the skeleton is the finish tooch.

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Wide clavicles
« Reply #11 on: September 24, 2011, 01:41:40 AM »
phil never was a big believer in wide clavicles.