i mean it's not fair to compare some one who competed 20 years ago or even 10 years ago to a current pro. because the main thing in pro. bb (after genetics) is drugs!!.. ronnie said clearly IF lee had taken what i took he would have been better than me.. so the subject of this thread is not to compare ronnie at his best to lee at his best but to imagine if lee took what ronnie took what would have he looked like!!..
so we can't say for example branch warren is a better bb than arnold just because his best beats arnold best without putting into consideration the many ears between them!!..
Had the drugs been available, Haney most likely would have passed on them anyway. He alluded to doing some things outside his comfort zone to be in the shape he was in his last Olympia.
But, if he did, what would be better than Coleman? All the flaws you point out - wider waist for example, would also happen to Haney if he took them. His arm/torso ratio would get worse, etc....
But, it's lunacy to argue physiques based on what they COULD'VE taken, since there's no way of really knowing anything. Wes' comment is true.