Investment note: Planned failure is also timed failure which makes the planned exit plan predictable.
What is most important is not necessarily when the corruption began. What is important is when the corruption is at its end-point, its exit plan, admission, recognition anddebasement-stage. That is the point when one learns what was needed, what was in demand, and why the corruption began because the projects in demand and the projects that were needed such as India’s information and energy infrastructure and Tyco’s thousandoffshore points of light.. were completed. That is why exactly what is needed.. is discussed/planned behindclosed doors. Then the planners let the outsiders speculate unwittingly and generally unsuccessfully to fund what was needed. Once what was needed is complete it becomes obvious that it was planned and it becomes obvious why it was planned.
The phases of true supply/demand, shortage/glut and boom/bust is the beauty of the passage of time, as long as one has access to an accurate, truthful and complete timeline of how this game has been played throughout history.
If voting really matters.. one might ponder was this a case of big government, or small government? Was this a case of socialism or a case of free-markets? And, if voting really matters, who voted for it? Highly notable is the fact that this 20-year time period included both Clinton and Bush.. both Republican and Democrat administrations. This bi-partisan failure of regulation is, in a great part, responsible for the great economic progress, growth and high employment of the Clinton era and the early part of the bush administration.
It also becomes apparent that promising not to regulate, investigate and prosecute financially corrupt corporations for the length of time Judge Painter’s admission indicates accounts for why HealthSouth’s Richard Scrushy held the belief that it was possible that 8,000 companies may have truly had “sh-t on their balance sheets” at or about the same period of time Richard Scrushy was cooking his corporation’s books.
Intentional failure of law and regulation is little more than organized theft.
The primary function of government is to pretend to fail. The primary purpose of the CFTC (a fourth branch) has also become apparent. In this case, Judge Levine was asked, behind closed doors, to promise to fail and obviously, like all good judges should.. Judge Levine kept his promise. One might wonder where Judge Levine’s salary comes from?
Enron and dozens of other energy companies are said to have duped the IRS in order to achieve their book-cooking goals but in the case of the CFTC, Enron only needed a promise from a federal judge?
A promise not to obey the law is a PLAN not to obey the law.
The state-controlled government wants the public to think the Enron years were nothing more than a blunder. A failure. A mess. Oversight. A debacle. Consistent and exhaustive use of motive-less words, terms andplatitudes like “debacle” and “blunder” have that “we didn’t plan it” kind of sound to them. After all, debacles and blunders are totally random. Totally unpredictable. Totally un-timed and without rhyme or reason. No cause to ask why. No reason to question when. After all, who would plan a debacle? Who in their right mind would plan a blunder? Only a hard-core conspiracy nut would be insane or irrationally suspicious enough to believe their government would actually plan to commit securities fraud.
But, a plan instantly introduces questions. First why and then.. when? The admission of the plan answers much of the question of “who” almost instantly. But.. it is that irritating “don’t even go there” question of “why”? And the potential answer to why, leads to the potential direction of.. predictability. 20/20 hindsight leads to the possibility of 20/20 foresight. What did the government need in the past that the government won’t need in the future? The word “future” has that “predictability” kinda sound to it.
The new facts and details that have come to light PROVES IT WAS PLANNED. This is the complex reality behind the true story of the Enron years that the government-controlled media is trying at all costs.. to avoid. They do not want the fact that it was planned to become public knowledge. Because first of all your government is not supposed to plan corruption and secondly, every entrance to a plan must include an exit. A start and a finish. What was the exit plan?
In light of this recent regulatory admission, legal cases such as Enron corporation and as many others as possible should be reopened.
This might account for the current deafening silence on the part of the press and the reason financial journalists are told to hold off about 50 years to print the truth behind the regulatory circumstances behind industrial revolutions and their associated artificially inflated economic boom periods.
Twenty years of enterprise corruption and the ultimate conflict of interest at the regulatory level of government and zero outrage and, for the most part, zero media attention and zero media concern? This is the media that advertises itself to be looking out for the viewer’s self-interests and the self assigned watchdog looking for signs of fleecing of the taxpayers?
Why does it matter and what are we going to do about it?
It matters because the same people running the last show are running the next show. The powers that be are exactly like the powers that have been.
