damn u beat me too it,he has looked fuller in the legs and delt area and seen him harder condition.
Absolutely NOTHING special about that physique, as average as it gets. If he wasn't a handsome boy nobody would even mention that guy.
LOLkill yourself hater!you are no 1 hater of getbig!sore loser
in other words, the shitty genetics olympia
actually I lied
nearly everyone in BB these days has shitty ugly geneticsthe ones with good genetics lose.
I like that one "Arnold" I agree partly. Many pros's looked pretty good when they became pro, or during their first years as a pro, but they made the classic "bigger is better" mistake. Examples are Ronnie(1998), Jay(2001), Flex(1993) and many others. Too muscle muscle on their frames made them blocky and deteriorated their conditioning.
yep...and that's why shawna ray is the best bodybuilder of all time...he knew where his limit was and was able to bring the best possible package (no homo) like 10 years in the row...maybe one or two last years his waist was a bit bigger which made him look a lot worse immediately...but 94 and 97 he should've taken the title...99 too, if ronnie weren't there
midgets alwaays want to be big
Some of those guys aren't pros, but you have guys like Dan Hill and Putnam that are
Yes!, and I also want to include Vince Taylor and Kevin Levrone to this category. Only the last 2-3 years Kev played the size game as well, but he never got a serious gut like Ronnie. It would be cool to see those 3 fellas on a masters show
Shannon Sharpe likes what he sees