Bodybuilding judges don't care about cheating as far as steroids, GH, etc, because they know this is the only way to show the muscularity that looks impressive and not like that of any regular surfer you see at a beach. As long as they can excuse that such muscularity was build on "training, nutrition and supplementation", they are ok with it. But they do not like and do mark down things like synthol and muscle implants. Why? Because they are obvious cheating that cannot be excused by "training and nutrition". A super-huge muscle still leaves room to be explained by "training and nutrition" if you make the excuse that the guy who owns the muscles has super-Human genetics or things like that, but a muscle with lumps that are wombly cannot be explained. It is obvious cheating, and the judges mark it down. Jay made a huge mistake this year. A missing muscle can be excused by the judges(Dorian's non-existent left biceps in 1997), but they do not excuse lump of oil because it marks the posessor as a cheater.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
My definition/view on what " cheating " is When a JOHN DOE comes along, whos NEVER worked out, exercised, weight trained a day in thier life, and takes Steroids from DAY 1 of ever working out, and the ONLY way to have FAKE MUSCLE is to have MUSCLE IMPLANTS.
