240, Karl Rove is Kicking Your Ass!!!!

[MM2K]

Remember when you tried to spin Karl Rove's words about the first electoral map? Well, in this video clip he basically says that Romney will win the election, and he shows you why. Pay special attention to what he says about the swing state polls that "show Obama leading".

http://www.klup.com/videoclip.aspx?Id=f35e80d3-72bb-41b3-8537-7287a9f95b1d

[MM2K]

Sorry, wrong link. I have corrected it.

[whork]

Remember when you tried to spin Karl Rove's words about the first electoral map? Well, in this video clip he basically says that Romney will win the election, and he shows you why. Pay special attention to what he says about the swing state polls that "show Obama leading".

http://www.klup.com/videoclip.aspx?Id=f35e80d3-72bb-41b3-8537-7287a9f95b1d

How can you in any way respect Rove, Morris and the rest of those fat, lying pathetic fucks

You can add Ed Schultz to the list this is not a repub vs. dem issue

[MM2K]

How can you in any way respect Rove, Morris and the rest of those fat, lying pathetic fucks

You can add Ed Schultz to the list this is not a repub vs. dem issue

You arent playing with a full deck of cards bro. Rove and Morris arent perfect, and Morris particularly allows himself to get intellectually lazy sometimes, but you cant possibly compare the man who got Bush Jr. elected twice and the man who single handedly turned around Clinton's presidency to the useless turd that is Ed Shultz. Come back to Earth. Being objective doesnt necessarily mean viewing both sides as being equally pathetic.

[whork]

You arent playing with a full deck of cards bro. Rove and Morris arent perfect, and Morris particularly allows himself to get intellectually lazy sometimes, but you cant possibly compare the man who got Bush Jr. elected twice and the man who single handedly turned around Clinton's presidency to the useless turd that is Ed Shultz. Come back to Earth. Being objective doesnt necessarily mean viewing both sides as being equally pathetic.

Not a comparison i agree Morris and Rove is on a different level than Shultz. I just have a really hard time listening to these folks.

Especially Morris first he said Romney would never get elected now he is talking about how Conservatives should rally behind him. I now its politics and Romney is the candidate for the GOP and part of Morris job is to get him elected.
I hate this 2 party BS where they have too support there candidate on every issue because othervise it gives ammo for the other side.
I guess principles are a thing of the past.

[240 is Back]

I think Rove is a brilliant dude.
The only thing you show me with this clip is that Rove took heat for saying (last week) - so he's changing his position.
Rove = flip flopping.   Changed from "Romney's in trouble" to "Romney will win" in a week.

I have never understood this defense.  I point out Mitt Romney saying economy is better, and people's only defense is to show an OPPOSITE position from Mitt, a conflicting statement.

All we learn here is that Rove - Like Romney - will flip flop when political pressure is applied to him.

[MM2K]

Not a comparison i agree Morris and Rove is on a different level than Shultz. I just have a really hard time listening to these folks.

Especially Morris first he said Romney would never get elected now he is talking about how Conservatives should rally behind him. I now its politics and Romney is the candidate for the GOP and part of Morris job is to get him elected.
I hate this 2 party BS where they have too support there candidate on every issue because othervise it gives ammo for the other side.
I guess principles are a thing of the past.

Yeah, Morris messed up there. I have always said that Conservatives were highly irrational for making Romneycare a deal breaker with Romney. No one had a problem with it in 2007, and Romney tried to put in some free market aspects into the law, but was overruled by the 85% Democrat Congress.

I think he tried to explain that away by saying that Romney is a much better candidate than he was 4 years ago. But Morris has remained neutral on all of the candidates and didnt start backing Romney until it became obivous that his oponents couldnt win without taking the primary fight to the convention.

[240 is Back]

Yeah, Morris messed up there. I have always said that Conservatives were highly irrational for making Romneycare a deal breaker with Romney. No one had a problem with it in 2007, and Romney tried to put in some free market aspects into the law, but was overruled by the 85% Democrat Congress.

I think he tried to explain that away by saying that Romney is a much better candidate than he was 4 years ago. But Morris has remained neutral on all of the candidates and didnt start backing Romney until it became obivous that his oponents couldnt win without taking the primary fight to the convention.

Did you see the lukewarm endorsement EMAIL that santorum gave romney?

IMO, a powerhouse like Clinton would say "Look, MFer, if you want me to pay off your campaign debts, if you want me to NOT destroy your political career - your ass is going to hold a press conferened in Hershey, Penn and you're going to hug and smile me and help me to consolidate this unsure conservative base".

Conservatives are lukewarm on Romney.  He's working to win by default.  He's not TAKING the presidency.  Seems like he plans on just being safe and professional but not rattling any cages, and hoping he can just back into the presidency.  It might work.

[MM2K]

Did you see the lukewarm endorsement EMAIL that santorum gave romney?

IMO, a powerhouse like Clinton would say "Look, MFer, if you want me to pay off your campaign debts, if you want me to NOT destroy your political career - your ass is going to hold a press conferened in Hershey, Penn and you're going to hug and smile me and help me to consolidate this unsure conservative base".

Conservatives are lukewarm on Romney.  He's working to win by default.  He's not TAKING the presidency.  Seems like he plans on just being safe and professional but not rattling any cages, and hoping he can just back into the presidency.  It might work.

No, Conservatives are slowly but surely getting fired up and supporting him. If anything, they are encouraged by the early polling and the smash mouth political tactics of the Romney Campaign. Right now Team Romney is achieving the best of both worlds. It is being aggressive but still being calm and not looking angry. I think McCain was afraid to go after the Bill Ayers/Jeremiah Wright stuff because he thought it would make him look negative and angry.

By the way, its interesting that in 2008, liberals didnt think accounts of Obama hanging out with a domestic terrorist were a "real issue", but stories of Mitt Romney putting his dog in an airtight kennel on top of his car 30 years ago is a "real issue".

[Shockwave]

[240 is Back]

No, Conservatives are slowly but surely getting fired up and supporting him. If anything, they are encouraged by the early polling and the smash mouth political tactics of the Romney Campaign. Right now Team Romney is achieving the best of both worlds. It is being aggressive but still being calm and not looking angry. I think McCain was afraid to go after the Bill Ayers/Jeremiah Wright stuff because he thought it would make him look negative and angry.

By the way, its interesting that in 2008, liberals didnt think accounts of Obama hanging out with a domestic terrorist were a "real issue", but stories of Mitt Romney putting his dog in an airtight kennel on top of his car 30 years ago is a "real issue".

Obama hung out with Ayers before he blew shit up, right?  Did ayers have any crimes/record when they hung out?  I mean, it's tough to hate on him iF the guy did somethign 10 years later, ya know?   That dog was a suffering dog the same day romney hosed its own shit off it for a 12 hour 60 mph ride.

and to me, i'm just finding humor in seeing repubs "getting fired up".  They half seem to be saying "let's just lose 2012 so we can get Jeb in there in 2016 and really fix shit".

Cause 8 years of Romney compromising to dems like he did in Mass?  Yikes.  Dems must be dancing in the streets.  Mitt's record says it all.  Signed a gun ban.  Wrote obamacare.  Gave in to dems in mass state senate.  Showed no balls.  Can't strongarm softies like santorum, he's gonna be weak as a popcorn fart against the likes of Putin.

I just shake my head and everyong 'coming around' to romney, getting 'fired up'.   lol oh brother.  

[MM2K]

Obama hung out with Ayers before he blew shit up, right?  Did ayers have any crimes/record when they hung out?  I mean, it's tough to hate on him iF the guy did somethign 10 years later, ya know?   That dog was a suffering dog the same day romney hosed its own shit off it for a 12 hour 60 mph ride.

and to me, i'm just finding humor in seeing repubs "getting fired up".  They half seem to be saying "let's just lose 2012 so we can get Jeb in there in 2016 and really fix shit".

Cause 8 years of Romney compromising to dems like he did in Mass?  Yikes.  Dems must be dancing in the streets.  Mitt's record says it all.  Signed a gun ban.  Wrote obamacare.  Gave in to dems in mass state senate.  Showed no balls.  Can't strongarm softies like santorum, he's gonna be weak as a popcorn fart against the likes of Putin.

I just shake my head and everyong 'coming around' to romney, getting 'fired up'.   lol oh brother.  

No 240, actually, Im pretty sure the terrorist attacks occured in the 60s/70s. Obama was just a kid back then. Im sorry you believe that people's lives are less precious than a clean dog. And there will be very few Dems in the Senate for Mitt to compromise with. And with any luck, the ones he will have to compromise with will be the likes of people like Joe Manchin, who arent socialist left wing nuts. Getting approval of the pipeline for example, should be very easy for him.

[240 is Back]

No 240, actually, Im pretty sure the terrorist attacks occured in the 60s/70s. Obama was just a kid back then. Im sorry you believe that people's lives are less precious than a clean dog. And there will be very few Dems in the Senate for Mitt to compromise with. And with any luck, the ones he will have to compromise with will be the likes of people like Joe Manchin, who arent socialist left wing nuts. Getting approval of the pipeline for example, should be very easy for him.

ah gotcha.  i gor the dates wrong i guess.

i just don't see romney having balls as president, to be honest.  caves to those weak ass mass dems.

and the gun ban bill?  ALl him to sign that one.  and defending romneycare STILL? 

[Soul Crusher]

ah gotcha.  i gor the dates wrong i guess.

i just don't see romney having balls as president, to be honest.  caves to those weak ass mass dems.

and the gun ban bill?  ALl him to sign that one.  and defending romneycare STILL? 

240 - how many people have you made buddies with that bombed the pentagon, robbed a bank, and killed a cop? 

[240 is Back]

240 - how many people have you made buddies with that bombed the pentagon, robbed a bank, and killed a cop? 

i don't associate with people like that. 

but then again, you are going to criticize obama for NOT associating with felons  -  his brother, for example.

So you are going to shit on him no matter what.

[whork]

No, Conservatives are slowly but surely getting fired up and supporting him. If anything, they are encouraged by the early polling and the smash mouth political tactics of the Romney Campaign. Right now Team Romney is achieving the best of both worlds. It is being aggressive but still being calm and not looking angry. I think McCain was afraid to go after the Bill Ayers/Jeremiah Wright stuff because he thought it would make him look negative and angry.

By the way, its interesting that in 2008, liberals didnt think accounts of Obama hanging out with a domestic terrorist were a "real issue", but stories of Mitt Romney putting his dog in an airtight kennel on top of his car 30 years ago is a "real issue".

Who are these liberals who gives a shit about a 30 year old dog?