Author Topic: Obama: Economy 'Headed in the Right Direction'  (Read 1642 times)

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Obama: Economy 'Headed in the Right Direction'
« on: July 08, 2010, 06:49:52 PM »
OK...So why are you americans screaming and complaining so much... your president says everything is going fine and as expected. Are you just over reacting? Not giving the PLAN a chance?...

Obama: Economy 'Headed in the Right Direction'

Updated: Thursday, 08 Jul 2010, 3:39 PM EDT
Published : Thursday, 08 Jul 2010, 3:39 PM EDT

(NewsCore) - President Barack Obama said it was “absolutely clear” that the U.S. economy is “headed in the right direction” as a result of the actions his administration has taken in response to the financial crisis.

Speaking at Smith Electric Vehicles in Kansas City, Mo., Obama reiterated that his administration inherited America’s poor economic state, adding he was forced to make “difficult decisions at a moment of maximum peril.”

“We were guided by a simple idea. Government doesn't have all the answers,” the president said.

“And it cannot generate the jobs or growth we need by itself. But government can lay the foundation for small businesses to expand and hire, for entrepreneurs to open up shop and test new products, for workers to get the training they need, and for families to achieve some measure of economic security.”

Obama praised Smith Electric Vehicles, an all-electric, zero emissions commercial truck manufacturer that received a $32 million Recovery Act grant, for hiring its 50th employee, saying energy investments “will not only boost our economy in the short run, but provide opportunities for growth in the long run.”

He chided those he said have “made a political calculation that it’s better to obstruct than lend a hand,” and touted his administration’s Recovery Act grants and tax breaks for small businesses.

“This is how we take charge of our destiny. This is how we create jobs and lasting growth. This is how we ensure that America not only recovers, but prospers -- that this nation leads in the industries of the future,” Obama said.
C

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama: Economy 'Headed in the Right Direction'
« Reply #1 on: July 09, 2010, 05:42:42 AM »
He is right, if you are a communist and want to see this nation destroyed. 

 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama: Economy 'Headed in the Right Direction'
« Reply #2 on: July 09, 2010, 06:53:40 AM »
Even is former supporters realize what a disaster he is.

________________________ ________________________ _________________

Business leaders say Obama's economic policies stifle growth
By Lori Montgomery
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, June 23, 2010


The chairman of the Business Roundtable, an association of top corporate executives that has been President Obama's closest ally in the business community, accused the president and Democratic lawmakers Tuesday of creating an "increasingly hostile environment for investment and job creation."

Ivan G. Seidenberg, chief executive of Verizon Communications, said that Democrats in Washington are pursuing tax increases, policy changes and regulatory actions that together threaten to dampen economic growth and "harm our ability . . . to grow private-sector jobs in the U.S."

"In our judgment, we have reached a point where the negative effects of these policies are simply too significant to ignore," Seidenberg said in a lunchtime speech to the Economic Club of Washington. "By reaching into virtually every sector of economic life, government is injecting uncertainty into the marketplace and making it harder to raise capital and create new businesses."

Seidenberg's remarks reflect corporate America's growing discontent with Obama. The president has assiduously courted the nation's top executives since taking office last year, seeking their counsel on economic policy in the wake of the recession and issuing dozens of invitations to the White House. In return, the Roundtable has generally supported the president's policies; it was the only major business group to back Obama's successful push for an overhaul of the health-care system.

In recent months, however, that relationship has begun to fray. First, Democrats included a provision in the health-care bill -- over the Roundtable's objection -- that reduced corporate subsidies for drug coverage to retirees, a move that could cost big companies millions of dollars. Then the EPA unveiled rules to regulate greenhouse-gas emissions even without climate-change legislation, creating uncertainty about the future cost of energy.

The final straw, said Roundtable president John Castellani, was the introduction of two pieces of legislation, now pending in Congress, that the group views as particularly bad for business. One, a provision of the administration's financial regulation overhaul, would make it easier for shareholders to nominate corporate board members. The other would raise taxes on multinational corporations. The rhetoric accompanying the tax proposals has been particularly harsh, Castellani said, with Democrats vowing to campaign in this fall's midterm elections on a platform of punishing companies that move jobs overseas.

"We had been working very closely with them," Castellani said, but things kept popping up that were "not just an irritant but a distraction" to promoting economic growth.

White House spokeswoman Jennifer Psaki disputed that notion. "The president has consistently pursued policies designed to create a better climate for American businesses in order to foster job creation, innovation and economic growth," she said via e-mail. "We have always had an open door to the business community, and we look forward to an ongoing dialogue."

A White House official said the administration has a "very good relationship" with Seidenberg and expects that to continue. Seidenberg is one of a number of chief executives who have met several times with Obama and repeatedly with senior officials. In February alone, he was invited to dinner with Obama and to the president's Super Bowl party.

Seidenberg, whose company is at odds with the Federal Communications Commission over a plan to regulate broadband providers, first expressed his concerns about the direction of Democratic economic policy in a meeting last month with White House budget director Peter Orszag. When Orszag asked for specifics, Seidenberg polled the members of the Business Roundtable and a sister organization, the Business Council. The result was a 54-page document, delivered to Orszag on Monday, chock full of bullet points about actions taken or considered by a wide array of executive agencies, including the White House Middle Class Task Force and the Food and Drug Administration.

"We believe the cumulative effect of these proposals will help defeat the objectives we all share -- reducing unemployment, improving the competitiveness of U.S. companies and creating an environment that fosters long-term economic growth," Seidenberg wrote in a cover letter for the document, titled "Policy Burdens Inhibiting Economic Growth."

In his speech, Seidenberg said he has been "encouraged" by the administration's response to the letter, which includes an offer of additional meetings to discuss the specific complaints. And he denied that his relationship with Obama has deteriorated, saying he has visited the White House more times in the past year than "in the previous 16."

Obama "is not ignoring us," Seidenberg said. The problem, he said, is translating those discussions into policy actions that do not simply expand government, but help a nervous private sector "create work" in uncertain times.



Mons Venus

  • Guest
Re: Obama: Economy 'Headed in the Right Direction'
« Reply #3 on: July 09, 2010, 08:17:47 AM »
OK...So why are you americans screaming and complaining so much... your president says everything is going fine and as expected. Are you just over reacting? Not giving the PLAN a chance?...

Obama: Economy 'Headed in the Right Direction'

Updated: Thursday, 08 Jul 2010, 3:39 PM EDT
Published : Thursday, 08 Jul 2010, 3:39 PM EDT

(NewsCore) - President Barack Obama said it was “absolutely clear” that the U.S. economy is “headed in the right direction” as a result of the actions his administration has taken in response to the financial crisis.


Pure BS

SAMSON123

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8670
Re: Obama: Economy 'Headed in the Right Direction'
« Reply #4 on: July 09, 2010, 08:40:14 AM »
Pure BS

It is only BS if you don't know what his idea of THE RIGHT DIRECTION means....
C

tallandfat

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 229
Re: Obama: Economy 'Headed in the Right Direction'
« Reply #5 on: July 09, 2010, 09:51:06 AM »
remember when you have insane inflation
1 stock price seem go up to compensate
2 insane house prices are backfilled until they become reality -- prorectign real estate tax base

nice fist f to normal guy

lets kick the commies out come fall!

overspending has never in history worked and yes great dep caused by fed+govt finance [fed created 1913]  as the 2008 nuke was [+fanne freddy which new laws dont gut]

yikes

crazy obama and commies at heml stealing $$ and avalance of taxes!  wars still on and oil spill!!

worst president ever?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama: Economy 'Headed in the Right Direction'
« Reply #6 on: July 09, 2010, 10:42:28 AM »
Small businesses “losing their steam” (Uh oh, America's jobs growth engine is sputtering)
Hotair ^ | 07/09/2010 | Ed Morrissey


Common wisdom has the small business sector being the engine of economic growth and job creation. It’s the small, nimble players who can react the fastest to anticipated demand;m where larger corporations move more slowly and cautiously, small businesses can make decisions quickly on expansion and hiring. They are seen as harbingers for the future direction of the economy — which is why the LA Times sends up a warning flare today on a drop in small-business hiring (via Calculated Risk):

For the recovery to gain steam, most economists believe small businesses need to be strong enough to hire new workers. But according to one measure, the employment picture in this sector is weakening.

Intuit Inc., which provides payroll services for small employers, says the nation’s tiniest companies had fewer new hires last month than any time since October.

The data are further evidence of a trend that has had many economists worried for months and intensifies concerns that smaller firms may not be robust enough to help lead the country out of its financial slump. The slowdown in hiring is particularly troublesome, experts say, because small businesses typically hire first during a recovery. A reluctance by little companies to add positions could mean that the big firms, which typically lag behind, will add jobs even more gradually.

“It’s a bad sign,” said Susan Woodward, an economist who tracks small business employment for Intuit. “Small businesses hire first — and they’re losing their steam.”

Intuit has a clientele of 56,000 small businesses, certainly a good sample from which to derive analyses of hiring patterns. According to their payroll reports, small businesses began expanding in February, with Intuit seeing 60,000 more payroll positions, or about one for each of their customers. Since then, however, these business owners have become much more cautious. In May, the number had dropped to 32,000, and last month payrolls only grew 18,000, meaning that hiring averaged less than one new hire for every three small businesses.

Now, some small businesses wonder whether to replace those who are leaving:

Tulsa Rib Co., a restaurant in Orange, needs to hire two people to replace workers who left their jobs recently. But Liz Parker, who owns the eatery with her husband, Steve, said business was too inconsistent to justify the hires.

“One week we’ll have all of our lunches and dinners filled, and we’ll feel real super that customers are going to come back,” she said, “and then the next week it falls off a cliff.”

As the Times explains, this deflation of enthusiasm is a big problem in the overall job picture. Small businesses (those with 19 employees or fewer) account for one-sixth of American jobs, but this year they have accounted for one-third of all new jobs. If small businesses stop opening new positions and hold off on expansion, larger companies probably won’t pick up the slack. It’s a recipe for stagnation in employment.

Part of the issue is credit. Small businesses can’t get loans very easily these days, and most expansion requires bridge loans to make investments ahead of the increased revenue predicted. But part of it is also costs — and with Congress debating a bill that will significantly increase energy costs and businesses looking at the additional burdens of ObamaCare, they’re not terribly eager to add personnel in the midst of uncertainty.


Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Obama: Economy 'Headed in the Right Direction'
« Reply #7 on: July 09, 2010, 02:09:06 PM »
I think I'm actually going to kneepad for Barry here.  He has to be cheerleader.  He has to push an optimistic, positive point of view.

I can only imagine him coming out and saying, "the end is near", lol.

BM OUT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8229
  • Getbig!
Re: Obama: Economy 'Headed in the Right Direction'
« Reply #8 on: July 09, 2010, 02:21:13 PM »
I think I'm actually going to kneepad for Barry here.  He has to be cheerleader.  He has to push an optimistic, positive point of view.

I can only imagine him coming out and saying, "the end is near", lol.

The problem is ONLY HE believes it.He has lost ANY magic he had to convince Americans of anything[other then ignorant blacks].Health care is still despised all his talking means shit.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama: Economy 'Headed in the Right Direction'
« Reply #9 on: July 09, 2010, 02:30:15 PM »
I think I'm actually going to kneepad for Barry here.  He has to be cheerleader.  He has to push an optimistic, positive point of view.

I can only imagine him coming out and saying, "the end is near", lol.

The problem is that no one believes him, there is no evidence of his claims, and everyone with an ounce of a clue knows his policies are akin to kicking a man while he is down. 

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Obama: Economy 'Headed in the Right Direction'
« Reply #10 on: October 19, 2011, 08:06:15 PM »
Report: Under Obamacare, less-skilled workers will be most likely to be priced out of jobs
Hot Air ^ | October 19,2011 | Tina Korbe
Posted on October 19, 2011 10:27:22 PM EDT by Hojczyk

The employer premiums for a single plan, distributed across a full-time work year, will add $1.79 per hour to these labor costs. The premiums for a family plan will add $5.51 per hour. Nationwide minimum labor costs will rise to an average of $10.03 per hour for full-time workers with a single health plan and $13.75 per hour for workers with family coverage.

Moderately and highly skilled workers already cost more than this minimum to employ. Their employers will likely respond to the law by spending more on health benefits and reducing wages by a corresponding amount. The health care law will not increase their total compensation costs.

But it is an entirely different story for unskilled workers. Employers cannot reduce cash pay below the minimum wage. However, employers will not pay workers more than their productivity. No businesses will pay $14 per hour to employ a worker whose labor raises earnings by just $9 per hour. Businesses that pay workers more than their productivity quickly go out of business. …

Obamacare hurts less skilled workers. It raises the minimum productivity required for them to hold a full-time job, particularly workers with families. Workers who cannot produce at least $20,000 per year (single plan) or $27,500 per year (family plan) of value to employers will have serious difficulty finding full-time jobs. Many of these workers will have to either live off reduced income from part-time hours or juggle the schedules of multiple part-time jobs.

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...