LMAO. your criticism woulb be valid if the painting i posted were an avant guard piece of abstract impressionistic art which really had no value and no special insight or representation of the world there in, but the one i posted is an incredible masterpiece. i have exceptional taste in art.. and i despise pieces without value. your opinion reeks of one depserate for recognition without an ability to recognize others. yes, detail and accuracy are also very worthy. but let me appease you... i didnt use such a style on purpouse, its just one of my more favored paintings... the point was addressing a criticism of bodybuilders who use drugs to reach levels of development unattainable otherwise... saying that there objective did not contribute to society... and i wonder if lovemonkey holds that same opinion about pieces of art.. do they also not contribute to society ? what say you, does this piece contirbute to society ?
it's dangerous to impose yourself like that; to declare what is "art" and decide what holds value
if a piece evokes such emotion in you, to make you
despise something, then surely there is value in that, no?