Author Topic: New liberal study: Obama has already issued far more new regulations than Bush  (Read 410 times)

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
A new report from the liberal Center for Progressive Reform (CPR) says that the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) under the Obama Administration has made more changes to federal regulations– including EPA rules– than their Bush Administration predecessors. The CPR blog writes:


“The results were shocking even to us, long-time and admittedly jaded observers of OIRA’s one-way ratchet toward weakening public health and other protections.

Obama’s OIRA changes more rules than Bush’s did. The Obama Administration has further entrenched a regulatory system in which White House officials trump agency expertise with decisions based on raw politics. While the Bush Administration changed 64 percent of regulations under this process, the Obama Administration has changed 76 percent.”



The CPR study tracked a decade’s worth of meetings between outside parties and the OIRA, the White House office that oversees federal agency rule making. NPR describes the OIRA as “the last hurdle that every proposed regulation must surmount before seeing the light of day” and “an office that most people have never heard of” that affects millions of Americans’ lives.

The study delivers a harsh criticism of President Obama for meeting with industry representatives far more often than with public safety advocates.

“Despite his selection of experienced and well-respected appointees to lead health and safety agencies—most notably, Lisa Jackson at the EPA, Margaret Hamburg at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and David Michaels at the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)—President Obama has not made lasting commitments to substantially increase their budgets, has not supported them when they are politically attacked, and done next to nothing to press for updating the outmoded laws that hamper their efforts to police corporate misconduct,” writes CPR President Rena Steinzor. “Worst of all, he has continued the Reagan and Bush tradition of enthroning OIRA as the final arbiter of whether public health and environmental protections see the light of day.”

Michael Fitzpatrick, who has worked in the OIRA for the past three years, told NPR that his office is improving regulations, not gutting them.

“When you are dealing with the most complex questions of policy, it’s to be expected that there are going to be questions raised and insights gleaned that cause an agency to say, ‘You know what? We should make a change here or there. We can do this in an even better way.’”

John Graham, a Bush Administration official who ran the regulatory oversight office, told NPR that the finding’s results could have to do with what he has noticed in his own experience, where Republican presidents tend to put people in charge of agencies who don’t like new rules. These agencies in turn don’t send a lot of regulations to the White House for review.

What makes things even more interesting is who has been running Obama’s OIRA for the last two years, Cass Sunstein. Sunstein is an Obama University of Chicago faculty lounge bud who has said the conservative view of the constitution requires a “time machine,”  animals should have the right to sue humans, and has advocated a policy under which the government would “presume” someone has consented to having his or her organs removed for transplantation into someone else when they die unless that person has explicitly indicated that his or her organs should not be taken.

Sunstein is also author of the book “Nudge” and husband to Samantha Power. Power is the aid to the President and former journalist who wrote “A Problem From Hell: American and the Age of Genocide,” once referred to Hillary Clinton as “a monster,” has had a growing role in Obama’s foreign policy circle, and is a leading proponent of the interventionist doctrine called “responsibility to protect.”

The CPR believes the study on the OIRA “cements its reputation as an aggressive one-way ratchet. “

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/new-liberal-study-obama-admin-changes-more-federal-rules-than-bush/



He's all about fixing the economy, br0s!

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
I guess you should'nt have voted for him then

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Guess where that disgusting traitorous Cvnt Jackson came from?   

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41757
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Free Republic
Browse · Search   Pings · Mail   News/Activism
Topics · Post Article
Skip to comments.

Obama's EPA is killing the economy with costly rules
Washington Examiner ^ | 11/26/11 | Masthead Editorial
Posted on November 28, 2011 10:28:26 PM EST by neverdem

Anybody who wonders why the U.S. economy continues to stagger along with 9 percent unemployment and an anemic 2 percent quarterly growth rate need look no further than the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Under President Obama's hand-picked administrator, Lisa Jackson, EPA is hog-tying the economy with dozens of proposed major new rules. One of them, which is aimed at coal-fired power plants that generate electricity, will add at least $18 billion in compliance costs by 2020. As Kathleen White of the Texas Public Policy Foundation told the House Energy and Commerce Committee earlier this year, "never in its 40-year history has EPA promulgated -- at the same time -- so many costly new regulatory dictates. The rules on track to go into effect in the next three years could cost more than $1 trillion and result in hundreds of thousands of jobs lost."

It's not just the raft of new rules that is killing economic growth, however. Jackson and her EPA minions have been purposefully slow-walking the agency's already hideously complex process for approving permits in a crucial sector of the energy industry. Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Okla., asked the EPA inspector general to review the agency's permitting process for surface mining permit applications in the Appalachian region over the last two years. The EPA IG found that of the 185 permit applications it identified, only 56, or less than one-third of the total, had been approved. Almost half of the 185 required at least 731 days for EPA to complete its evaluations. That compares with the 144 days EPA claims is its average evaluation period for all mining permit applications. At least a third of the 185 were simply withdrawn from consideration, presumably because the applicants despaired of ever getting a response from EPA.

The IG report confirmed Inhofe's prior suspicion that EPA has been "systematically slowing the pace of permit evaluations in Appalachia. Even more troubling is that as our nation works to find ways to cut our national debt, EPA has increased its budget and staff to evaluate these permits. Instead of spending more and more taxpayer dollars to wage this war on affordable energy, the Obama-EPA should be processing and approving these permits to spur job creation, especially in areas such as the Appalachia that have significant employment needs. Equally important is the potential domestic energy production that these permits would provide."

Because 40 percent of the electricity that Americans depend on daily is generated by power plants fueled by coal -- much of which comes from Appalachia -- sluggardly permit processing by EPA should concern everybody. And let's not forget that Jackson works for a president who before he was elected promised that his environmental policies would "necessarily cause electricity prices to skyrocket."

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Under Obama this is considered a part of the normal political process.  Under Bush it was a facist takeover.  ::)

Fury

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21026
  • All aboard the USS Leverage
Under Obama this is considered a part of the normal political process.  Under Bush it was a facist takeover.  ::)

How DARE you insinuate that Obama isn't focused on jobs like a LASER.

Al Doggity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7286
  • Old School Gemini
That isn't what that study says. That article doesn't even make sense! Why would a liberal group be upset that a Democratic president passed more regulations than a Republican ???

The study says that the Obama administration has supported more DE-REGULATION than Bush.

Obama Weakened Regulations at Greater Rate Than Bush, Study Says

And the accuracy of that is debatable.