The NY Times anti-Christian/pro-Muslim bigotry exposed

[Fury]

NY TIMES REFUSES TO RUN ANTI-ISLAM AD… AFTER RUNNING ANTI-CATHOLIC AD



The New York Times has rejected a full-page anti-Islam advertisement that mirrored a scathing anti-Catholic advertisement the newspaper published on March 9.

According to The Daily Caller, a March 13 letter sent by the Times to the parody’s sponsor, activist Pamela Geller, said the $39,000 anti-Islam ad was rejected because “the fallout from running this ad now could put U.S. troops and/or civilians in the [Afghan] region in danger.”

Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League, accused the Times of having a double standard and told  DC that The Time’s was based on “either [anti-Catholic] bigotry or fear [of Islamic violence], and they’ve painted themselves into that corner.”

DC adds:

Donohue said the frequent claims of intellectual honesty by Times employees would compel them to address the double standard if they weren’t “shameless.”

TheDC asked Robert Christie, the Times’ senior vice-president for corporate communications, if the Times’ decision is a surrender to violence and also an incentive for additional threats of violence.

However, Christie declined to discuss the paper’s decision, and referred TheDC to the letter sent by the Times to Geller and her organization, Stop the Islamization of Nations.

The original ad was created by the controversial, and often radical, Wisconsin-based Freedom from Religion Foundation. The ad, “It’s Time to Quit the Catholic Church” positioned itself as an “open letter to ‘liberal’ and ‘nominal’ Catholics.”

“Will it be reproductive freedom, or back to the Dark Ages?” it asks. “Do you choose women and their rights, or Bishops and their wrongs? Whose side are you on?”

“Not a single Catholic who reads this ad will be impelled to leave the Church. That is not the issue,” said Donohue in response to the ad. “The issue is the increase in hate speech directed at Catholics.”

CNA adds more information about the anti-Catholic ad:

The ad claims that the church is “an avowedly antidemocratic Old Boys club” and derides Catholic teaching that contraception use is sinful. It also blames the Church for causing misery, poverty, unwanted pregnancies and deaths and attacks Catholic teaching on the ordination of women, parochial schools, and the Church’s response to sex abuse.

The ad, which includes a disparaging cartoon of a Catholic bishop, claims U.S. Catholic bishops’ conference has made a “declaration of war against women’s right to contraception.” The ad is featured below:



http://www.theblaze.com/stories/ny-times-refuses-to-run-anti-islam-ad-after-running-anti-catholic-ad/



As if the NY Times has ever cared about putting troops in danger. This is just further proof of the pro-Islamist slant these disgusting leftist rags have taken. Can criticize any religion but Islam. 

[Emmortal]

Did anyone really need more proof of this, heh.

[JBGRAY]

No bias at all.  Simply common sense. 

You can bash Christians all day.  You can have displays of Jesus Christ dipped in a jar of urine.  You can run ruthless attack ads against Christian men without fear of damage to your reputation.  You can demand churches pay taxes.  You can call this religion cult.  What is the end result?  Nothing.  Christians do nothing more than complain a little bit and then shut up.  Being anti-Christian carries no penalty at all.

Bash Muslims?  Do that, and....there is a strong possibility of violence.  Like explosions.  And many deaths.  On top of that, this is a protected religion by the leftists(in spite that should Islam assert itself as the dominant culture, the leftists would be hanging from a noose from a sour apple tree).

[OzmO]

Unreal.  

So the counter argument is that hey are doing to prevent potential problems?

What's the argument that they are being bias other than this?

[Fury]

No bias at all.  Simply common sense. 

You can bash Christians all day.  You can have displays of Jesus Christ dipped in a jar of urine.  You can run ruthless attack ads against Christian men without fear of damage to your reputation.  You can demand churches pay taxes.  You can call this religion cult.  What is the end result?  Nothing.  Christians do nothing more than complain a little bit and then shut up.  Being anti-Christian carries no penalty at all.

Bash Muslims?  Do that, and....there is a strong possibility of violence.  Like explosions.  And many deaths.  On top of that, this is a protected religion by the leftists(in spite that should Islam assert itself as the dominant culture, the leftists would be hanging from a noose from a sour apple tree).

Common sense? Way to kowtow to them. That's exactly why they react violently. Because they know people like you will then bow down to them and ignore their actions. And save the song and dance. The NY Times has NEVER cared about protecting the troops.

Your argument basically states that because they can't conduct themselves like civilized human beings we should give them a free pass. Good idea. Tell that to the Christians and other religious groups facing ever increasing persecution in Muslim countries.

[Shockwave]

I agree with this. With let those filthy fucking animals get away with this shit, and they do it because they know that. Islam is a fucking brutal intolerant group and should be treated as such IMHO. Theyre not gonna play by the rules, and theyre using our rules to take us over from the inside. Fuck em', kill em all.

[_bruce_]

Christianity has been sabotaged for some time now -> think about for example the catholic pedo media explosion.
Now it's getting really obvious that the US government is pushing Islam - all over the globe -> pay detail to how the US military treats the bible and Qooran... you will be shocked.
The "Islahm is the fastest growing religion" syndrome is artificially engineered thanks to US support(setting up Muslim Brotherhood bastions in the middle east)... all the while supporting slaughter of Christians in Africa -> Kony2012.

Islahm couldn't update itself to 2.0 because of ongoing eager western intervention for too long in too many strategic places.

People naturally born inside Islahm are like anybody else, so given time and some prosperity they grow out of it - like it's been happening all along in the west with Christianity.

And... IF we want to go into "Conspiracy"...
-the age of pisces(Jesus) is quasi over and the age of aquarius is at the door
-this is new age calls for a new monolithic religion which instead of going the trouble for a new one will be a trusted durable sword -> Islam
-this tool perfectly fits the NWO's unified vision of a supercontrolled state where all critical opposition will be crushed
-if you follow some info about the writings of early "masons" there's always talk about unifying mankind into a new "brotherhood" -> fastforward to now and see Muslim Brotherhood propaganda all over the place which gets its money from Saudi "sponsors"

Enjoy ShariAmerica