Author Topic: Bodybuilding Myth Debunked: Growth-Promoting Hormones Don't Stimulate Strength  (Read 2148 times)

Schmoff

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120614130946.htm

ScienceDaily (June 14, 2012) — New research from scientists at McMaster University reveals exercise-related testosterone and growth hormone do not play an influential role in building muscle after weightlifting, despite conventional wisdom suggesting otherwise.

The findings indicate that bodybuilders who look to manipulate those hormones through exercise routines are wasting their time.

In two separate studies, published in the Journal of Applied Physiology and the European Journal of Applied Physiology, researchers found anabolic hormones -- long thought to be essential for building a muscular frame -- do not influence muscle protein synthesis, the process that leads to bigger muscles.

"A popular mindset for weightlifters is that increased levels of hormones after exercise play a key role in building muscle," explains Daniel West, lead author of both studies and a graduate student in the Department of Kinesiology at McMaster. "That is simply not the case."

In the first study, researchers examined the responses of both male and female participants to intense leg exercise. Despite a 45-fold difference in testosterone increase, men and women were able to make new muscle protein at exactly the same rate.

"Since new muscle proteins eventually add up to muscle growth, this is an important finding," says West.

"While testosterone is definitely anabolic and promotes muscle growth in men and women at high doses, such as those used during steroid abuse, our findings show that naturally occurring levels of testosterone do not influence the rate of muscle protein synthesis."

In the second study, researchers analyzed the post-exercise hormonal responses of 56 young men, aged 18 to 30, who trained five days a week for 12 weeks in total.

The men experienced gains in muscle mass that ranged from virtually nothing to more than 12 pounds, yet their levels of testosterone and growth hormone after exercise showed no relationship to muscle growth or strength gain.

Surprisingly, the researchers noted that cortisol -- considered to have the opposite effect of anabolic hormones because it reduces protein synthesis and breaks down tissue -- was related to the gain in muscle mass.

"The idea that you can or should base entire exercise training programs on trying to manipulate testosterone or growth hormone levels is false," says Stuart Phillips, a professor in the Department of Kinesiology. "There is simply no evidence to support this concept."

The research was funded in part by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.


Raymondo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7458
  • I spoke at the United Nations
In other news


tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20535
  • Biscuit
a

Croatian

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 235
OLD NEWS about HGH, Garvan Institute (Sydney) was testing HGH effect for a year & in 2007 inform public about it.
See Garvans website for more infos.
We all knew that bodybers don't read scientific papers so  ;D ;D ;D.

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120614130946.htm

ScienceDaily (June 14, 2012) — New research from scientists at McMaster University reveals exercise-related testosterone and growth hormone do not play an influential role in building muscle after weightlifting, despite conventional wisdom suggesting otherwise.

The findings indicate that bodybuilders who look to manipulate those hormones through exercise routines are wasting their time.

In two separate studies, published in the Journal of Applied Physiology and the European Journal of Applied Physiology, researchers found anabolic hormones -- long thought to be essential for building a muscular frame -- do not influence muscle protein synthesis, the process that leads to bigger muscles.

"A popular mindset for weightlifters is that increased levels of hormones after exercise play a key role in building muscle," explains Daniel West, lead author of both studies and a graduate student in the Department of Kinesiology at McMaster. "That is simply not the case."

In the first study, researchers examined the responses of both male and female participants to intense leg exercise. Despite a 45-fold difference in testosterone increase, men and women were able to make new muscle protein at exactly the same rate.

"Since new muscle proteins eventually add up to muscle growth, this is an important finding," says West.

"While testosterone is definitely anabolic and promotes muscle growth in men and women at high doses, such as those used during steroid abuse, our findings show that naturally occurring levels of testosterone do not influence the rate of muscle protein synthesis."

In the second study, researchers analyzed the post-exercise hormonal responses of 56 young men, aged 18 to 30, who trained five days a week for 12 weeks in total.

The men experienced gains in muscle mass that ranged from virtually nothing to more than 12 pounds, yet their levels of testosterone and growth hormone after exercise showed no relationship to muscle growth or strength gain.

Surprisingly, the researchers noted that cortisol -- considered to have the opposite effect of anabolic hormones because it reduces protein synthesis and breaks down tissue -- was related to the gain in muscle mass.

"The idea that you can or should base entire exercise training programs on trying to manipulate testosterone or growth hormone levels is false," says Stuart Phillips, a professor in the Department of Kinesiology. "There is simply no evidence to support this concept."

The research was funded in part by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.



Oh really??  ::) ::) ::)


Maybe they should let people do these kind of studies that actually have a fucking clue of what they are talking about...

If you are natural, how can you even train "based entirely on trying to manipulate" hormone levels....

If you are natural, you just train, no matter what you do, HIT, volume, DC, doesn't fucking matter as long as you keep the training consistent and don't eat too much crap.

Croatian

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 235
link?

www.garvan.org.au ,Search - human growth hormone

That was 12 months study on over 100 people, no other medical/scientific organization completed such HGH studies/test for longer than 3 months.
In August 2007, I have attended one of Prof.Ho's presentation regarding HGH research in the audience I could not see any of big Aussie BB but there where a few others from speed sports .John Fahey president of WADA was there.
I was inform  that ASADA (WADA) & Australian Institute of Sport is co-operating with Garvan Institute.

Fact is: if HGH works, why then small BodyBers don't grow & they should be only 1 class/category not like in IFBB for example 9 bodyweight categories or so !.

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
www.garvan.org.au ,Search - human growth hormone

That was 12 months study on over 100 people, no other medical/scientific organization completed such HGH studies/test for longer than 3 months.
In August 2007, I have attended one of Prof.Ho's presentation regarding HGH research in the audience I could not see any of big Aussie BB but there where a few others from speed sports .John Fahey president of WADA was there.
I was inform  that ASADA (WADA) & Australian Institute of Sport is co-operating with Garvan Institute.

Fact is: if HGH works, why then small BodyBers don't grow & they should be only 1 class/category not like in IFBB for example 9 bodyweight categories or so !.


Problem with this study is, how much HGH did they give the people?

35 i.u. per day? 50i.u.?  ::)

jws56

  • Getbig I
  • *
  • Posts: 11
I was there as one of the presenters and spoke with Professor Ken Ho.
Simply he wanted money for one of his clinical trials and was interested in those individuals that have been shortened due to lack of growth hormone during developmental stage.
He was asked to come up with a test so that he could stamp out those suspected of cheating using HGH.
He said to the auditorium that HGH presented no advantage in the athletes and testing for it was a waste of time.
He still needed the money so agreed to come up with some testing
Protocols.

jude2

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11660
  • Getbig!
hm they didnt say what causes muscle growth there, cept that (low) cortisol plays a role?


Dosen't say if high or low was related to the gains