Author Topic: Guess who's back (cry)bitches  (Read 2996 times)

dj181

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28051
  • And he was just like a great darkwing
Re: Guess who's back (cry)bitches
« Reply #25 on: October 31, 2012, 11:53:25 AM »
Not at all, I'm 100% into science and 0% into art  ;)

In which way do you think I'm misunderstood? I'm curious, surprise me!

well man, geniuses are generally misuderstood, since they are on "another level" so to speak

so maybe you can draw a conclusion from what i've just said ;)

chaos

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59525
  • Ron "There is no freedom of speech here" Avidan
Re: Guess who's back (cry)bitches
« Reply #26 on: October 31, 2012, 11:58:27 AM »
he's allright, he's just misunderstood, that's all

the typical "artist" type, if you will

so do you have some artistic talent moen ma man?
"misunderstood"? Is that code for guys that like to sit on plungers ???
If so, then yes, moen is extremely misunderstood. Several times a day. :-X
Liar!!!!Filt!!!!

Raymondo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7484
  • I spoke at the United Nations
Re: Guess who's back (cry)bitches
« Reply #27 on: October 31, 2012, 12:03:31 PM »
"misunderstood"? Is that code for guys that like to sit on plungers ???
If so, then yes, moen is extremely misunderstood. Several times a day. :-X

 ;D

bigmc

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
Re: Guess who's back (cry)bitches
« Reply #28 on: October 31, 2012, 12:05:21 PM »
well man, geniuses are generally misuderstood, since they are on "another level" so to speak

so maybe you can draw a conclusion from what i've just said ;)

does you definition of genius mean someone who threatens peoples children

and sends hardcore gay pics to everyone via pm

i would call that a bottom feeding retard
T

dj181

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28051
  • And he was just like a great darkwing
Re: Guess who's back (cry)bitches
« Reply #29 on: October 31, 2012, 12:21:41 PM »
does you definition of genius mean someone who threatens peoples children

and sends hardcore gay pics to everyone via pm

i would call that a bottom feeding retard

this threatening people's children is a definate no-no, and if he did so, then that is definately wrong, and that's not cool at all >:(

i got some of these porn pics myself, but i'm sure he's just trying to be a jokester with that, and it wasn't meant to be taken seriously

Moen

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2863
  • Getbig!
Re: Guess who's back (cry)bitches
« Reply #30 on: October 31, 2012, 12:22:07 PM »
well man, geniuses are generally misuderstood, since they are on "another level" so to speak

so maybe you can draw a conclusion from what i've just said ;)

That definitely applies to me.

Even in Kindergarten, I knew I was a cut above all the rest.

I had a very high IQ score at age 12. Since I'm not one to boast too much, I will not give the exact number. But since you already used that particular word, you know where I'm at minimally.

Moen

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2863
  • Getbig!
Re: Guess who's back (cry)bitches
« Reply #31 on: October 31, 2012, 12:26:18 PM »
I have no idea where the threatening children comes from by the way, I would never treaten children. And everyone I sent gay pics from who thought it wasn't a joke, may need to evaluate his own retard-level  ;)

Tito24

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20638
  • I'm a large man but.. one with a plan
Re: Guess who's back (cry)bitches
« Reply #32 on: October 31, 2012, 12:27:46 PM »

bigmc

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23049
Re: Guess who's back (cry)bitches
« Reply #33 on: October 31, 2012, 12:55:06 PM »
I have no idea where the threatening children comes from by the way, I would never treaten children. And everyone I sent gay pics from who thought it wasn't a joke, may need to evaluate his own retard-level  ;)

jokes are meant to be funny
T

Moen

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2863
  • Getbig!
Re: Guess who's back (cry)bitches
« Reply #34 on: October 31, 2012, 01:32:35 PM »
Jokes that aren't funny, are not non-jokes, faulty deduction there.

That's not even taking into account the subjectivity of the perception of the receiver of the joke.