Hey Coach!

[Necrosis]

http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/2012/11/01/tuhweet-chrysler-executive-to-donald-trump-you-are-full-of-sh/

speaking of integrity, what do you think of the Romney campaigns continued lies about jeep? surely that is a lack of integrity?

Why are they repeating it like a mantra?

[whork]

http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/2012/11/01/tuhweet-chrysler-executive-to-donald-trump-you-are-full-of-sh/

speaking of integrity, what do you think of the Romney campaigns continued lies about jeep? surely that is a lack of integrity?

Why are they repeating it like a mantra?

You are asking the biggest lier on this board about integrity?

Coach/33.... Integrity left a long time ago.

Remember the fake letter?

[Coach is Back!]

http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/2012/11/01/tuhweet-chrysler-executive-to-donald-trump-you-are-full-of-sh/

speaking of integrity, what do you think of the Romney campaigns continued lies about jeep? surely that is a lack of integrity?

Why are they repeating it like a mantra?

As usual, the left and, of course yourself are wrong. Being outsoursed to italy they they are outsoursing parts to China. Care to flat out lie or at the very least, spin it more?

[Coach is Back!]

Hello?

[Necrosis]

As usual, the left and, of course yourself are wrong. Being outsoursed to italy they they are outsoursing parts to China. Care to flat out lie or at the very least, spin it more?

they are not moving all production to china, merely expanding in china? Chrysler has actually refuted this several times, do you not understand what a fact is? you are not entitled to your own facts. They are not being outsourced to  Italy, there is no outsourcing to china, where are you getting this information from? The very company annouced they  are increasing production in the states and adding 1100-2100 jobs.

So you are fine with this blatant lie?

[whork]

they are not moving all production to china, merely expanding in china? Chrysler has actually refuted this several times, do you not understand what a fact is? you are not entitled to your own facts. They are not being outsourced to  Italy, there is no outsourcing to china, where are you getting this information from? The very company annouced they  are increasing production in the states and adding 1100-2100 jobs.

So you are fine with this blatant lie?

So Romney is flippin the finger at someone who is actually a job creator

The man doesnt really give a shit about jobs

[Coach is Back!]

Maybe the left should read both sides of their bullshit (haha, yeah, right!) before they speak. So far, like Palin, you make up shit then get proven wrong time and time again. You know as well as I do, 90% of the bullshit you spew isn't true. But, oh well, It's that integrity thing again.


The Washington Post Fact Checker has declared that Mitt Romney's television ad about Jeep production being moved overseas, which has "hurt" the "feelings" of the Obama campaign and the left, is "factually defensible" and "technically correct."

Actually, the Fact Checker's Glenn Kessler gave the Jeep ad four Pinocchios, somehow conveying a verdict of gross dishonesty, despite the fact that no statement in Romney's ad is incorrect. But my headline conveys the "overall impression" of Kessler's article--which is the standard he uses to attack Romney.

Here is the naked truth about Romney's claims about Jeep. Romney was wrong to say, in a speech in Ohio last week, that Jeep is moving "all" production to China. That statement, even if it was just a slip, was worthy of correction.

But the Jeep ad airing in Ohio makes no such statement. It says that Chrysler, Jeep's parent, was sold "to Italians who are going to build Jeeps in China." That is 100% correct, and has been since 2010, as Tony Lee pointed out yesterday. It is also true that "Fact checkers confirm that [Obama's] attacks on Mitt Romney [on the auto bailout] are false" and that Romney "is supported by Lee Iacocca and the Detroit News."

So what is the Fact Checker upset about? The "overall impression," which is an entirely subjective judgment of whether Obama or Romney had the better of the argument about whose policy was best for the auto industry.

This is yet another example of the corruption of so-called "fact checkers" in the mainstream media, who routinely run interference for the Obama campaign. Kessler's attack on Romney--for that is what it is--even resembles the complaints of Obama aides David Axelrod and Jim Messina on a call with reporters yesterday.

No doubt the Obama campaign will work up a television ad featuring Kessler's four Pinocchios--and the Washington Post will be in no hurry to remind readers that it acknowledged Romney was actually correct on the facts.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/10/30/WaPo-Rates-Romney-Jeep-Ad-Correct

[Necrosis]

Maybe the left should read both sides of their bullshit (haha, yeah, right!) before they speak. So far, like Palin, you make up shit then get proven wrong time and time again. You know as well as I do, 90% of the bullshit you spew isn't true. But, oh well, It's that integrity thing again.


The Washington Post Fact Checker has declared that Mitt Romney's television ad about Jeep production being moved overseas, which has "hurt" the "feelings" of the Obama campaign and the left, is "factually defensible" and "technically correct."

Actually, the Fact Checker's Glenn Kessler gave the Jeep ad four Pinocchios, somehow conveying a verdict of gross dishonesty, despite the fact that no statement in Romney's ad is incorrect. But my headline conveys the "overall impression" of Kessler's article--which is the standard he uses to attack Romney.

Here is the naked truth about Romney's claims about Jeep. Romney was wrong to say, in a speech in Ohio last week, that Jeep is moving "all" production to China. That statement, even if it was just a slip, was worthy of correction.

But the Jeep ad airing in Ohio makes no such statement. It says that Chrysler, Jeep's parent, was sold "to Italians who are going to build Jeeps in China." That is 100% correct, and has been since 2010, as Tony Lee pointed out yesterday. It is also true that "Fact checkers confirm that [Obama's] attacks on Mitt Romney [on the auto bailout] are false" and that Romney "is supported by Lee Iacocca and the Detroit News."

So what is the Fact Checker upset about? The "overall impression," which is an entirely subjective judgment of whether Obama or Romney had the better of the argument about whose policy was best for the auto industry.

This is yet another example of the corruption of so-called "fact checkers" in the mainstream media, who routinely run interference for the Obama campaign. Kessler's attack on Romney--for that is what it is--even resembles the complaints of Obama aides David Axelrod and Jim Messina on a call with reporters yesterday.

No doubt the Obama campaign will work up a television ad featuring Kessler's four Pinocchios--and the Washington Post will be in no hurry to remind readers that it acknowledged Romney was actually correct on the facts.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/10/30/WaPo-Rates-Romney-Jeep-Ad-Correct

Yes they are building jeeps in China, that's not a disputed fact. Romney stated they are moving all production to China, which is false. Also, them producing in China has no impact on the US production, they are simply expanding as demand is now increasing in China as jeep recovers there. Why in the world would that be placed in an add? why is jeep producing in china a point of contention if not to deceive? what are they going to build cars in the US and ship to china?

seriously you have a comprehension issue Joey.

Romney lied about production in china, he then repeats the lie with different wording that has no impact on jeep in the US. In fact Jeep in now increasing production in the US.

so what was the point of this article again?