Hi Hugo,
Serious question, Can you please tell me how that thread i started about the confiscation of kruggerrands allegedly by the CIA was inappropriate for the politics board?
Someone is alleging due to the sweeping & over reaching powers of a gov agency, he has had his property stolen. Confiscated without charges, let alone criminal conviction. How is that not appropriate for the political board? I truly do not understand.
Is it possibily because CIA being the culprit could be considered hearsay?
If so, would it then not be considered more appropriate for the conspiracy board?
Sincerely,
Confused in Canada.
