Author Topic: Napolitano: Drudge Report is not credible  (Read 1256 times)

Roger Bacon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20957
  • Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails
Napolitano: Drudge Report is not credible
« on: April 18, 2013, 03:56:39 PM »
Napolitano: Drudge Report is not credible

Charlie Spiering
Washington Examiner
April 18, 2013

During a House hearing this morning, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano criticized the Drudge Report for highlighting stories about the department’s purchases of ammunition and MRAP (mine-resistant, ambush protected) vehicles.

Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., questioned Napolitano about the reports from Forbes magazine and other stories linked on the Drudge Report.

[...] “I will tell you, we found it so inherently unbelievable that statements would be made, it was hard to ascribe credibility to them,” Napolitano said, suppressing a bemused smile, adding that, “I don’t know if I’d put Forbes and Drudge in the same sentence.”

Read full article

This article was posted: Thursday, April 18, 2013 at 2:46 pm




bighead

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1094
  • Getbig!
Re: Napolitano: Drudge Report is not credible
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2013, 04:03:59 PM »
hoodwink.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Napolitano: Drudge Report is not credible
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2013, 04:09:44 PM »
I suspect that she has no idea what kind of site Drudge is.
L

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22847
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: Napolitano: Drudge Report is not credible
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2013, 07:04:59 PM »
I agree, lots of people don't.  They just think its a slanted site and don't realize it a link based news site. 

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61621
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Napolitano: Drudge Report is not credible
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2013, 07:17:00 PM »
I find that hard to believe since it gets just about more hits than any other political site. She knows exactly what Drudge is.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Napolitano: Drudge Report is not credible
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2013, 07:17:23 PM »
Granted he may post a ton of links with a theme and those theme's shape opinion but he's not generating the stupid..he's only packaging it.

L

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61621
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Napolitano: Drudge Report is not credible
« Reply #6 on: April 18, 2013, 07:59:10 PM »
Napolitano is an idiot......



Everyone knows about The Drudge Report, the site that journalist and entrepreneur Matt Drudge created more than a decade ago.

Everyone knows that The Drudge Report has an extraordinarily large readership, especially given the size of the team that produces it (maybe three people, including Drudge himself).

Everyone knows that The Drudge Report still sets the rest of the media world on tenterhooks from time to time by announcing that it has exclusive news forthcoming.

What few people know — in part because of the apparent simplicity of the site — is that Matt Drudge is arguably the single-most powerful individual in the digital news business.

What few people also know is that the deceptively simple Drudge Report is one of the most successful and profitable digital media businesses on the planet.

And here are some other things that few people know:

    The Drudge Report is, at minimum, worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
    Matt Drudge, presumably, created, funded, and owns all of it.
    This combination of influence and wealth makes Matt Drudge one of the most successful digital media entrepreneurs in the world — the Rupert Murdoch or William Randolph Hearst of the digital age.

Don't believe it?

Let's look at some numbers.

    The Drudge Report recently announced that it has surpassed 1 billion pageviews per month. How many pageviews is that? It's about as many pageviews as The New York Times reportedly got per month as recently as a couple of years ago.
    The Drudge Report has 14.4 million US readers per month — only slightly fewer readers than The New York Times (16.4 million), per Quantcast.

In short, the Drudge Report is almost as big a digital media property as The New York Times.

That's absolutely staggering.


Why?

Because The New York Times is produced by ~1,200 journalists. The Drudge Report is produced by one.

And how about economics?

Economically, The Drudge Report is much smaller than The New York Times. But that's in part by design. And, importantly, The Drudge Report is likely highly profitable, which is not something that can always be said for The New York Times.

The Drudge Report doesn't have a salesforce. It works with a firm called Intermarkets to sell the ad units on its pages. The Drudge Report contains general news, often with a political slant, which means The Drudge Report likely gets relatively low revenue-per-page. (Say, $1.50 per 1000 pages). But The Drudge Report has a lot of pageviews.

Assuming The Drudge Report gets $1.50 per 1000 pages and has 1 billion pageviews per month, The Drudge Report should be generating revenue of $15-$20 million a year.

That doesn't sound like much, but, importantly, Drudge has very low tech, editorial, and sales costs.

So almost all of that is profit.

Assuming The Drudge Report pays the full corporate tax rate on those earnings, the business probably generates $10-$15 million of after-tax profit per year.

So, how much is The Drudge Report worth?

Media properties generally trade at a 15x-25x multiple of earnings, or a 4x-5x multiple of revenue, depending on the growth rate of the business and the level of profitability.

A range of 15x-25x earnings for the current incarnation of The Drudge Report, therefore, would produce an estimated value of $150 million to $375 million.

And those values, importantly, drastically understate the value that could be created if Matt Drudge decided to build it out into a more typical digital media business.

One of the most remarkable things about The Drudge Report is that the site's content still consists primarily of original headlines linked to stories elsewhere on the web. This is a highly innovative and efficient media model, one that takes full advantage of the amazing capabilities of the Internet.

The editorial content that Drudge creates, in other words, consists of finding and interpreting important stories from millions of information sources around the world. Rather than creating a huge newsroom itself, the Drudge Report uses the whole digital world as a newsroom. And, importantly, unlike many digital media businesses, Drudge compensates those who did the work of creating the content that Drudge links to by sending them hundreds of thousands of readers — readers that they almost certainly would not have had had Drudge not chosen to link to them.

The Drudge Report, in other words, is not just a "win" for Drudge and its readers. It's a "win" for all of the content creators that Drudge links to, as well. So, everyone who creates content for a living should cheer for the success of The Drudge Report.

(In fact, given that news-business gurus still seem to be consumed with a perennial debate about the "future of news," it's time to recognize that, whatever that future is, The Drudge Report will be a highly successful and influential part of it. Traditional media organizations and journalism schools may not like that. But it's the truth.)

If and when Drudge wanted to, moreover, he could begin to build a small tactical newsroom of his own, along with a dedicated ad sales force. With almost no effort, these additions could double or triple the number of pageviews the site produces, along with the amount of revenue that The Drudge Report generates from them. Such investments might reduce the number of readers Drudge sends to other sites, but they would not stop this traffic flow completely. And they would likely make the site worth 2-3X as much as it is today.

In short, Matt Drudge has not just created a quirky little headlines-and-links site that occasionally breaks news.

He has created one of the most innovative, successful, and profitable digital media businesses on the planet, one that is likely worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

It's time he got some credit

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/drudge-report-is-worth-2012-10#ixzz2QsGrqFLl

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61621
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Napolitano: Drudge Report is not credible
« Reply #7 on: April 18, 2013, 08:01:26 PM »
You actually think all of those page views are right-wingers?

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Napolitano: Drudge Report is not credible
« Reply #8 on: April 18, 2013, 08:12:42 PM »
Drudge is credible, for the most part.

Do they "play ball" with the republican party to help em out?  Fuck yes.  Remmeber the secret inside polls the day before the 2008 and 2012 election "secret inside polls show it tied"

LMAO... they'll do it in 2016 too, if the repub is losing.  Remember them selling the non-existent Condi VP story - a story that romney and condi and everyone else immediately said was false - to distract from a bad week he was having?

Drudge, like msn, cnn, fox, and every other news outlet - serves one master: THE DOLLAR.   Can't hate on them.  Janet Napaltioano is immature and naive for not seeing that.

George Whorewell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7362
  • TND
Re: Napolitano: Drudge Report is not credible
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2013, 05:53:08 PM »
Well, if she said it, we must assume it's credible. ::)

Also, the Boston terror plot was really just another case of workplace violence involving kitchen utensils.  ::)