Author Topic: Haha hot babe owned!!!  (Read 3093 times)

EL Mariachi

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6019
Haha hot babe owned!!!
« on: September 08, 2013, 04:10:29 PM »

arce1988

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24630
  • ARCE USA USMC
Re: Haha hot babe owned!!!
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2013, 04:24:06 PM »
http://public.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/snuck.html



WRONG:   
SNUCK


RIGHT:   
SNEAKED


In American English “snuck” has become increasingly common as the past tense of “sneak.” This is one of many cases in which people’s humorously self-conscious use of dialect has influenced others to adopt it as standard and it is now often seen even in sophisticated writing in the US. But it is safer to use the traditional form: “sneaked.”

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21286
Re: Haha hot babe owned!!!
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2013, 04:26:44 PM »
It was kinda toolish for her to correct him.

anabolichalo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20049
  • my love for ronnie will never die
Re: Haha hot babe owned!!!
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2013, 04:35:23 PM »
dumb whore and a fag, ultimate get together

Natural Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11164
Re: Haha hot babe owned!!!
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2013, 04:38:56 PM »
Scripted. Fake. Get a fucking brain.

mr.turbo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4617
  • Team Freedom
Re: Haha hot babe owned!!!
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2013, 05:07:11 PM »
HAHAHA THANKS FOR SHARING THIS IS VERY ENTERTAINING EL MARIACHI
"

MikMaq

  • Guest
Re: Haha hot babe owned!!!
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2013, 05:25:32 PM »
It was kinda toolish for her to correct him.
Agreed if you know anything about language, changing sneak to snuck is a very natural progression.

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21286
Re: Haha hot babe owned!!!
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2013, 05:28:00 PM »
Agreed if you know anything about language, changing sneak to snuck is a very natural progression.

And if the new usage becomes popular, it ends up in the dictionary, which is what happened here.

Branchs Ears

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 494
Re: Haha hot babe owned!!!
« Reply #8 on: September 08, 2013, 05:29:36 PM »
Uhhhh where is the hot babe?

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: Haha hot babe owned!!!
« Reply #9 on: September 08, 2013, 08:38:25 PM »

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Haha hot babe owned!!!
« Reply #10 on: September 08, 2013, 08:40:14 PM »
Uhhhh where is the hot babe?

conan's a handsome man, i'm secure enough to admit that.   hot?  no.

Pray_4_War

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15801
  • Thot Expert
Re: Haha hot babe owned!!!
« Reply #11 on: September 08, 2013, 08:50:53 PM »
And if the new usage becomes popular, it ends up in the dictionary, which is what happened here.

She said it wasn't a word.  If it's in the dictionary it's a fucking word.  Not only was she a douche to correct him, but she was also wrong.

I understand that snuck is not a word often used in American literature but she's having a conversation.  Fucking douche trying to look smart.  Ordinarily I would say it was wrong for Conan to punk her like that but in this case it was well deserved.

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21286
Re: Haha hot babe owned!!!
« Reply #12 on: September 08, 2013, 09:50:41 PM »
She said it wasn't a word.  If it's in the dictionary it's a fucking word.  Not only was she a douche to correct him, but she was also wrong.

I understand that snuck is not a word often used in American literature but she's having a conversation.  Fucking douche trying to look smart.  Ordinarily I would say it was wrong for Conan to punk her like that but in this case it was well deserved.

Maybe you missed this.

It was kinda toolish for her to correct him.

Pray_4_War

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15801
  • Thot Expert
Re: Haha hot babe owned!!!
« Reply #13 on: September 09, 2013, 01:16:30 AM »
Maybe you missed this.


No I saw it.  I wasn't trying to disagree with you.  Perhaps my post read as if I was.  I probably shouldn't have quoted you.