The opposite of relativity is consistant/absolute

[Marty Champions]

in einstiens theory now how moronic is that

einstien says "nothing is constant" "nothing is still" "nothing is consistant"
he says this while taking into consideration EVERYTHING, thats a pretty bold statement for back then

its funny when people say "its all relative" that just means they have no clue about the "connectivity" of the event. Youre leaving out sacred details of an event when you say "its all relative"

[Mr Nobody]

Everything is temporary as in the last minute you live. There maybe a bit of consistent stuff in life but it isnt exact everyday.

[Irongrip400]

I admire your ability to be a deep thinker Johnny, keep up the good work bro.

[Marty Champions]

I admire your ability to be a deep thinker Johnny, keep up the good work bro.

best watch on youtube

the marker of an intelligent being is to be able to entertain a new idea without agreeing with it

[Marty Champions]

Everything is temporary as in the last minute you live. There maybe a bit of consistent stuff in life but it isnt exact everyday.

i think the laws are exact in nature we just dont know all the exact laws because weve been following the wrong theory for quite some time
 here is what einsteins theory/law suggests

This means a couple of things: objects can be traveling at different speeds depending on what reference point we take, time can be alter for different reference perspectives, and mass can alter from different perspectives.


look at the first one i highlighted . this suggests and object moves faster depending upon your reference point in veiwing it

even a common intelligent person can see how wrong that sounds. that makes no sense how does and object speed up or go faster just because im veiwing that object from earth or from jupiter

[Competitor 9]

i think the laws are exact in nature we just dont know all the exact laws because weve been following the wrong theory for quite some time
 here is what einsteins theory/law suggests

This means a couple of things: objects can be traveling at different speeds depending on what reference point we take, time can be alter for different reference perspectives, and mass can alter from different perspectives.


look at the first one i highlighted . this suggests and object moves faster depending upon your reference point in veiwing it

even a common intelligent person can see how wrong that sounds. that makes no sense how does and object speed up or go faster just because im veiwing that object from earth or from jupiter

Just stop already... The reason it doesn't make sense to you is that it's way over your head.... It's like this
2 people are on a train traveling 70mph they throw a foot ball at 20mph at each other from there perspective the football is traveling at 20mph.  If some one was to look at this from the ground depend on what direction the ball is throw it's either going 90 or 50 mph as the reference point is taking considering the speed of the train as the passengers have no reference in side a train car.


No stop with this shit you have no basic understand of physics

[Competitor 9]

Another simpler example for you. What if I told you right now you where traveling at 30000 mph as we orbit the sun? You don't see it due to you reference point. But if I put you on Jupiter you point of reference changes. As with any actions that take place on earth. Now your your equations have to take in the orbit of the earth

[Hulkotron]

in einstiens theory now how moronic is that

einstien says "nothing is constant" "nothing is still" "nothing is consistant"
he says this while taking into consideration EVERYTHING, thats a pretty bold statement for back then

its funny when people say "its all relative" that just means they have no clue about the "connectivity" of the event. Youre leaving out sacred details of an event when you say "its all relative"

Frog squats on the front lawn for great strength and prosperity

[Marty Champions]

Another simpler example for you. What if I told you right now you where traveling at 30000 mph as we orbit the sun? You don't see it due to you reference point. But if I put you on Jupiter you point of reference changes. As with any actions that take place on earth. Now your your equations have to take in the orbit of the earth

relative is the opposite of absolute

its like saying  "the theory of uncertainty" instead of the "theory of relativity"

when dumbasses say "its all relative" that means they cant define the absolute, and the "relative" answer is the easiest since it IS vague discription by definition


youre example is bad because if i was in a space shit traveling 30,000 mph orbiting the sun i would see it and feel it

[Marty Champions]

Just stop already... The reason it doesn't make sense to you is that it's way over your head.... It's like this
2 people are on a train traveling 70mph they throw a foot ball at 20mph at each other from there perspective the football is traveling at 20mph.  If some one was to look at this from the ground depend on what direction the ball is throw it's either going 90 or 50 mph as the reference point is taking considering the speed of the train as the passengers have no reference in side a train car.


No stop with this shit you have no basic understand of physics

another shit example wich direction does the ball move faster if it is thrown with the same 20mph effort? hmm not that difficult

seriously

your arguing a theory of "relativity" it is the opposite of absolute

so you are saying theres no real way of me telling the speed of someone throwing a ball on a train if im on the street standing still and the person is moving on a train

what are you TELLING ME that would be impossible for me to gauge correctly?

[Marty Champions]

Just stop already... The reason it doesn't make sense to you is that it's way over your head.... It's like this
2 people are on a train traveling 70mph they throw a foot ball at 20mph at each other from there perspective the football is traveling at 20mph.  If some one was to look at this from the ground depend on what direction the ball is throw it's either going 90 or 50 mph as the reference point is taking considering the speed of the train as the passengers have no reference in side a train car.


No stop with this shit you have no basic understand of physics

if the train is traveling 70 mph thats 102 feet per second so as long as the ball is suspended in air before someone catches it that is how fast it will be going WITHOUT THROWING IT WICH WOULD ADD 20mph

[Tito24]

the only consistant thing is the big boner in my pants haha

[Costanza]

the only consistant thing is the big boner in my pants haha

lol

[Marty Champions]

if the train is traveling 70 mph thats 102 feet per second so as long as the ball is suspended in air before someone catches it that is how fast it will be going WITHOUT THROWING IT WICH WOULD ADD 20mph

you see the point navy mike is trying to make is that from the street that i couldnt tell exactly how fast that ball was moving even though anyone can i would like him to explain his side better if he could

[Mr Nobody]

Counterweight's are a relative subject that need discussion here.

[SF1900]

the only consistant thing is the big boner in my pants haha

LMAO!!!

[Mr Nobody]

LMAO!!!

LOL I can never out class mars the dude is out there in another realm.

[temple_of_dis]

the only consistant thing is the big boner in my pants haha

relative to me its probably small