Author Topic: It was the video  (Read 1105 times)

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61562
  • It’s All Bullshit
It was the video
« on: December 30, 2013, 07:28:47 PM »
The left are still going with that. Do these idiots even know how to tell the truth? Their entire party is made of lies and cover ups that they continually get caught red handed in yet dumb asses like some of those on this very board will still vote for then. Never mind Obama, Clinton and the everyone else invoked are accessories to murder along with aiding and abetting. Now they seem to be covering up (more like in cahoots) with al quaida.   

Try all of them, sentence them and whatever the final consequence are, do it IMMEDIATELY!!

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61562
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: It was the video
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2013, 07:29:50 PM »
But oh, wait. What difference does it make now ::)

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24454
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
Re: It was the video
« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2013, 03:25:08 AM »
What are you talking about coach?
w

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: It was the video
« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2013, 05:05:42 AM »
What are you talking about coach?

He is talking about this LIE put out 2 days ago by the NY Times.

http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2013/benghazi/

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: It was the video
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2013, 05:13:32 AM »
NY Times trying to clear the way for Hillary "what difference does it make" Clinton.

They are so intent on getting her elected that they are willing to contradict themselves:

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/12/29/New-York-Times-Contradicts-Own-Reporting-on-Benghazi
New York Times Contradicts Own Reporting on Benghazi

Either New York Times writer David Kirkpatrick is ignoring his own colleagues’ work, or the Hillary Clinton supporters are laying out early foundations to combat what will be the biggest criticism of her tenure as Secretary of State if she decides to run for the Oval Office.
The New York Times' assertion that Al Qaeda’s involvement in the September 11, 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate and CIA annex in Benghazi is particularly questionable considering the preponderance of evidence that shows otherwise.

The 2011 New York Times piece goes on to say that the leader of Ansar al-Shariah, the group that Kirkpatrick now says has no connection to Al Qaeda, escaped from a Libyan prison in 1993 and went on to Afghanistan to train at a camp run by Osama bin Laden :

“The Libyan Government considers detainee a ‘dangerous man with no qualms about committing terrorist acts,’ ” says the classified 2005 assessment, evidently quoting Libyan intelligence findings, which was obtained by The New York Times. “ ‘He was known as one of the extremist commanders of the Afghan Arabs,’ ” the Libyan information continues, referring to Arab fighters who remained in Afghanistan after the anti-Soviet jihad.

When that Guantánamo assessment was written, the United States was working closely with Colonel Qaddafi’s intelligence service against terrorism. Now, the United States is a leader of the international coalition trying to oust Colonel Qaddafi — and is backing with air power the rebels, including Mr. Qumu.

The classified Guantánamo assessment of Mr. Qumu claims that he suffered from “a non-specific personality disorder” and recounted — again citing the Libyan government as its source — a history of drug addiction and drug dealing and accusations of murder and armed assault.

In 1993, the document asserts, Mr. Qumu escaped from a Libyan prison, fled to Egypt and went on to Afghanistan, training at a camp run by Mr. bin Laden. At Guantánamo, Mr. Qumu denied knowledge of terrorist activities. He said he feared being returned to Libya, where he faced criminal charges, and asked to go to some other country where “You (the United States) can watch me,” according to a hearing summary.

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: It was the video
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2013, 05:18:59 AM »
Absolute fabrication by that stupid "news"paper.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/matthew-vadum/the-new-york-times-benghazi-revisionism/

But on “Fox News Sunday,” House Intelligence Committee chairman Mike Rogers (R-Mich.), rejected the New York Times story. “I dispute that, and the intelligence community, to a large volume, disputes that,” he said, adding several times that the article was “not accurate.”

Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), also on the show, also rejected the newspaper report, saying “intelligence indicates al-Qaeda was involved.”

On Saturday, Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.), a member and former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, told Fox News the contention in the NYT article that the militia group Ansar al-Shariah — not al-Qaeda — led the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi, was an exercise in semantics.

“It’s misleading,” said King, given that Ansar al-Shariah is widely believed to be affiliated with al-Qaeda. “It’s a distinction without a difference.”

The New York Times article, allegedly the work product of a team of researchers, also contradicts the testimony of Greg Hicks, the deputy of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, who was murdered during the attack. Hicks said the “Innocence of Muslims” video, which portrayed the Islamic prophet Mohammed in an unflattering manner, was “a non-event in Libya” at that time and didn’t precipitate the Benghazi attack.


Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61562
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: It was the video
« Reply #6 on: December 31, 2013, 06:21:17 AM »
Sorry for the typos....new phone

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: It was the video
« Reply #7 on: January 01, 2014, 11:45:11 AM »
Hillary is a pos and a liar

RRKore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2628
Re: It was the video
« Reply #8 on: January 01, 2014, 01:04:35 PM »
I must admit that I don't understand what all the Benghazi crap is about. 

Can someone provide a half-way evenhanded summary (or link to one)?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: It was the video
« Reply #9 on: January 01, 2014, 04:16:11 PM »
I must admit that I don't understand what all the Benghazi crap is about. 

Can someone provide a half-way evenhanded summary (or link to one)?

4 Americans were killed in a terrorist attack on the Anniversary of 9/11 at a post where security was denied by State Department.  After attack Hillary and o-ghetto covered it up and lied about it to get past the election. 

avxo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5647
  • Iron Pumping University Math Professor
Re: It was the video
« Reply #10 on: January 01, 2014, 07:56:07 PM »
As big a fuckup as Benghazi was, and as much as it should be investigated more, I must admit that I have stopped listening to anything Mike Rogers and Peter King say.

Mike Rogers and Peter King... Fucking disgraceful pieces of shit.

jjbones

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 122
Re: It was the video
« Reply #11 on: January 04, 2014, 06:17:46 PM »
How the New York Slimes gets away with this is amazing.