Author Topic: Jeffrey Sinclair, Army General Accused Of Sex Crimes, Suffers Rapid Fall  (Read 877 times)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63956
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Interesting case.  What I find disturbing is the female who claims rape had consensual sex with him both before and after the alleged sex assault.  How twisted is that?  Scary what a woman can do with a rape accusation.   

Jeffrey Sinclair, Army General Accused Of Sex Crimes, Suffers Rapid Fall
By MICHAEL BIESECKER 01/04/14

FORT BRAGG, N.C. (AP) — With a single star studded on each shoulder of his immaculate dress blues, Brig. Gen. Jeffrey A. Sinclair waited his turn to go through the metal detectors at the federal courthouse at Fort Bragg, just like everyone else.

He smiled broadly at one of the armed military police officers posted at the door and asked: "How many jumps do you have?"

The young soldier, wearing the wings of a paratrooper with the elite 82nd Airborne, stood a little straighter as he confidently answered 28. Sinclair nodded in approval, not mentioning the 217 jumps listed in his own log. After a few more pleasantries, Sinclair put his arm around the man and smiled again as another MP snapped a cellphone photo.

The exchange last summer would be routine for a general building rapport with enlisted troops — but for the fact that Sinclair is believed to be the highest-ranking U.S. Army officer ever charged with sexual assault.

Sinclair, 51, has pleaded not guilty to eight criminal charges including forcible sodomy, indecent acts, violating orders and conduct unbecoming an officer. He faces a maximum sentence of life in prison at a court-martial scheduled to begin March 3.

While he denies the most serious allegation that he physically forced a female captain under his command to perform oral sex, the married father of two concedes he carried on a three-year extramarital affair with the junior officer. That admission alone will almost certainly end his 28-year Army career, as adultery is a crime under military law.

The female captain who made the initial complaint admits to having consensual sex with Sinclair on numerous occasions, both before and after the alleged assaults.

Prosecutors also allege the general had inappropriate contact with other women, including female officers expected to testify that he asked them to provide nude photos of themselves.

The case against Sinclair comes as the Pentagon is already grappling with a string of embarrassing revelations involving sexual misconduct within the ranks.

Prosecutions over such charges are on the rise even as the military's own data suggests only about 1-in-8 sexual assaults are reported or prosecuted. Influential members of Congress are now pushing to remove decisions about the prosecution of sex crimes from the military chain of command.

Anu Bhagwati, executive director of the advocacy group Service Women's Action Network, said Sinclair's court-martial will be closely followed.

"The military has always had a problem with sexual assault, but they have never experienced this sort of political pressure and public scrutiny," said Bhagwati, a former Marine captain.

Prosecutors portray Sinclair as a sexual predator who abused his position of authority to prey on a subordinate trained to follow his orders, threatening to kill her and her family if she told anyone of their relationship.

Sinclair's defense lawyers have suggested he is the victim, both of a jealous ex-lover and overzealous prosecutors facing intense pressure from top military and political leaders to send a message that sexual misconduct will not be tolerated. They say the evidence against him is weak — a case that in the past might have been resolved with a quiet reprimand and early retirement.

It is extremely rare for such a high-ranking military officer to face a jury. Under the military justice system, members of the panel must be senior in rank to the person charged — ensuring that Sinclair will be judged by a jury of generals.

Fred Borch, the regimental historian for the Army Judge Advocate General's Corps, said only about a dozen generals have been court-martialed since World War II.

"Obviously, men and women don't reach flag rank unless they're pretty special," said Borch, a retired colonel who prosecuted sexual assault cases as an Army lawyer. "So, by its very nature, you're going to have very, very few generals that get in trouble."

While he awaits his fate, Sinclair has been assigned to desk duty at Fort Bragg, a sprawling Army base in the piney Sandhills of southeastern North Carolina.

It has been a steep fall for a man once considered a rising star among the Army's cadre of trusted battlefield generals. As deputy commander of the 82nd Airborne, Sinclair oversaw 22,000 troops until he was abruptly sent home from Afghanistan last year and criminally charged.

Steely eyed and well over six feet tall, Sinclair still cuts the figure of the prototypical paratrooper. He is a veteran of five overseas combat deployments and winner of four Bronze Star medals. In battle, Sinclair enjoyed the confidence of his superiors and elicited fear and awe from subordinates.

During the 1991 Gulf War, Sinclair was decorated for helping smash Iraq's vaunted Republican Guard. In 2003, he helped command the first airborne combat brigade deployed to Kandahar, Afghanistan, a stronghold of the Taliban.

As a battalion commander in Iraq in 2004, Sinclair was tasked with stabilizing Saddam Hussein's hometown of Tikrit. He returned to Iraq three years later to command the bulk of U.S. troops in the volatile southern half of the country, and is credited with stabilizing the region despite steep losses from armor-piercing roadside bombs.

Copies of Sinclair's military performance evaluations obtained by The Associated Press show his superiors consistently rated him highly and put him on the fast track for advancement. In a July 2011 evaluation, then-82nd Airborne commander Maj. Gen. James L. Huggins enthusiastically endorsed Sinclair for promotion to the higher rank of major general.

"Jeff Sinclair is clearly the brightest and most multi-talented officer I have ever served with," Huggins wrote. "Whenever the division is challenged with critically tough tasks, Jeff finds a solution and the results are quick, efficient, and superb. ... If I could choose my successor, it would be Jeff."

Many subordinates described him in similarly glowing terms, even the woman accusing him of sex crimes.

"Everybody in the brigade spoke about Gen. Sinclair as if he was a God," she testified at an evidentiary hearing. "I heard from all of the male soldiers that I worked with what a hardened killer he was. I mean, they would tell stories about when he was a battalion commander, how everybody was like hunkered down behind vehicles and scared to death because the firing was just nonstop and ... (Sinclair) would get out in the street and ... walk through as if there was no one shooting at him."

The AP generally does not identify those who say they were sexually assaulted.

But the same man who would share cigars relaxing around a campfire with his junior officers or be quick to pat an enlisted paratrooper on the back also had a reputation as tough taskmaster. He could also be prone to arrogance, according to sworn testimony.

According to prosecutors, when Sinclair was confronted by a subordinate about using inappropriate language to describe female soldiers, he responded: "I'm a general, I'll say whatever the (expletive) I want."

Relieved of his command, Sinclair now spends many of his days at home in the leafy heart of the base reserved as quarters for those of high rank.

Heeding the advice of his lawyers, Sinclair declined comment for this article. But he was present, dressed casually in a button-down oxford and jeans on a weekday last summer when an AP reporter visited his home to interview his wife.

Rebecca Sinclair, 47, has emerged as her husband's most ardent public defender, appearing in nationally televised interviews to call attention to the strain placed on military marriages by repeated yearlong war deployments since 9/11. While she says she can't condone her husband's infidelity, Rebecca Sinclair is steadfast that the sexual assault accusations don't square with the man she has known for 30 years.

"My husband has made mistakes. He knows that, and he has admitted those mistakes to me," she said. "But do I understand how these things happen? Of course I do. We're not the only people in the military this has happened to. When you have the separations year after year, the marriage that you started out with isn't the marriage you have in the end."

The couple met on a blind date at West Virginia University, where the future general was an ROTC cadet. He came from modest means, the son of a factory worker who worked in a coal mine to help pay for college. But she liked that he was tall and says she could tell he was going places.

If there is any silver lining to their situation, Rebecca Sinclair said it is that her husband has been home to focus on being a dad. They have two school-aged sons.

"It has been a year for rebuilding," she said. "Whenever your husband says those words to you that no wife wants to hear, it's painful. But we make our choices and decide what is most important to us. We're working on our marriage and trying to get through this."

The couple are investing significant financial resources in the effort to keep Sinclair out of prison and fight a potential reduction in rank that could cost him in retirement benefits. Sinclair replaced his court-appointed military lawyers and retained a team of civilian attorneys specializing in white-collar defense.

They have also hired a New York City public relations firm to orchestrate a media strategy that includes a website touting Sinclair's military accomplishments while proclaiming his innocence and revealing information about his primary accuser intended to undercut her credibility.

Rebecca Sinclair chose not to attend the lengthy pretrial hearings that included intimate details of her husband's relationship with the young captain.

The woman, who served under Sinclair's direct command during combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan, says the general twice settled arguments with her by grabbing her head and forcing her to perform oral sex as she sobbed. She also says Sinclair threatened to kill her and her parents if she told anyone about their frequent sexual liaisons in hotels, headquarters and war zones.

"I was not to say anything to anyone or he would kill me. And then he said he would kill my family and that he could do it in a way that nobody knew it was him," the woman tearfully testified at a pretrial hearing. "Because I know he killed people in combat ... I didn't think he would say that unless he really meant it."

In court, the defense team has tried to paint Sinclair's accuser as a scorned lover, willing to lie to destroy him because he refused to leave his wife. They note that the woman didn't make the accusations until she saw emails the general had exchanged with other women and tearfully told Huggins, Sinclair's mentor.

By revealing the adulterous affair, the captain potentially jeopardized her own career. Prosecutors later granted her immunity in exchange for her testimony at Sinclair's court-martial.

At a pretrial hearing, the woman admitted she enjoyed sex with her commander on numerous occasions, even though she says he was sometimes physically domineering and emotionally abusive. She also introduced Sinclair to her parents after she says he threatened to kill them. Among the evidence likely to be presented in the case are thousands of often sexually explicit text messages in which the general and the captain profess their love for one another.

Even as Sinclair faces a lengthy prison sentence, the woman tearfully acknowledged on the witness stand she has mixed feelings about seeing him charged with crimes.

"In a (expletive) up way I still love him," she said, avoiding Sinclair's gaze as he sat nearby at the defense table. "I don't want him to be upset with me."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/04/jeffrey-sinclair-sex-crimes_n_4541533.html

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63956
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
 :o

Prosecutor in Army 1-star's sex case wanted charges dropped
Mar. 4, 2014
The Associated Press

FORT BRAGG, N.C. — The lead prosecutor in a sexual assault case against a U.S. Army general wanted the most serious charges dropped after he became convinced the accuser had lied about crucial evidence.

According to testimony, after Lt. Col. William Helixon shared those concerns with his superiors, he was referred for a mental health evaluation and removed from the case.

The testimony came at a hearing for Brig. Gen. Jeffrey A. Sinclair, who faces a court-martial on charges that include physically forcing a female captain under his command to perform oral sex.

Sinclair’s attorneys have asked a judge to dismiss the most serious of the charges against him, alleging top brass at the Pentagon have unlawfully interfered with prosecutorial decisions in the case.

Helixon was removed from the case last month after a superior officer, Brigadier Gen. Paul Wilson, visited him in a Washington hotel room on Feb. 8.

Wilson testified Tuesday that Helixon appeared drunk and suicidal. Wilson said Helixon didn’t want to pursue the case, but thought it was of strategic importance to the military’s crackdown on sexual assaults.

“He was in the midst of a personal crisis. He was crying. He was illogical,” Wilson said. “I truly believed if he could have stepped in front of a bus at the time, I think he would have.”

Sinclair, who was the deputy commander of the 82nd Airborne and a rising star among the U.S. Army’s top battle commanders, is fighting charges that could land him life in a military prison if convicted. He has pleaded not guilty to eight criminal charges including forcible sodomy, indecent acts, violating orders and conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman.

Lawyers for the married father of two have said he carried on a three-year extramarital affair with an officer under his command during war tours in Iraq and Afghanistan. The admission of an affair will almost certainly end his Army career.

The case against Sinclair, believed to be the most senior member of the U.S. military ever to face trial for sexual assault, comes as the Pentagon is grappling with a troubling string of revelations involving rape and sexual misconduct within the ranks.

In pretrial hearings, prosecutors painted Sinclair as a sexual predator who abused his position of authority to prey on a subordinate. They also say he threatened to kill her and her family if she told anyone of their relationship.

But the lead prosecutor became convinced the accuser lied to him when she testified in January about evidence collected from her cellphone. The female captain testified that on Dec. 9, shortly after what she described as a contentious meeting with prosecutors, she rediscovered an old iPhone stored in a box at her home that still contained saved text messages and voicemails from the general. After charging the phone, she testified she synced it with her computer to save photos before contacting her attorney.

However, a defense expert’s examination suggested the captain powered up the device more than two weeks before the meeting with prosecutors. She also tried to make a call and performed a number of other operations.

Wilson testified that Helixon was distraught that the accuser had lied to him.

“I served with him in combat in Afghanistan, making targeting decisions with people’s lives on the line. I have never seen another human being in a state like that,” he said of their meeting at the Ritz-Carlton in Washington.

Wilson said he took Helixon to the emergency room of a nearby military hospital for a mental health evaluation. Though a psychiatrist who interviewed the prosecutor declined to admit him for treatment, Wilson said he told Helixon’s immediate superior back at Fort Bragg that the prosecutor was no longer fit to handle the case.

“He was not fit for any kind of duty. I would not have trusted him to drive a car,” Wilson said.

Neither the defense nor prosecutors called Helixon to testify.

Sinclair’s defense lawyers suggest it is the general who is the victim, both of a jealous ex-lover and of overzealous prosecutors facing intense pressure from top military and political leaders to send a message that sexual misconduct will not be tolerated.

“We’re in a remarkable place,” Richard Scheff, Sinclair’s lead defense lawyer, said this week. “The chief witness lied under oath. The lead prosecutor resigned because he found her untruthful and non-credible. TheArmy’s senior leaders agree with his assessment. And yet we’re going to trial.”

The Associated Press does not publicly identify the alleged victims of sexual assaults.

Prosecutors have declined to comment about the case outside court proceedings.

After Helixon’s removal, a new prosecutor was assigned to take the case to trial, which is set to begin this week.

It is extremely rare for such a high-ranking military officer to face a jury. Under the military justice system, members of the panel must be senior in rank to the accused — ensuring that Sinclair will be judged by a jury of generals.

http://www.armytimes.com/article/20140304/NEWS06/303040001/Prosecutor-Army-1-star-s-sex-case-wanted-charges-dropped

RRKore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2628
Interesting case.  What I find disturbing is the female who claims rape had consensual sex with him both before and after the alleged sex assault.  How twisted is that?  Scary what a woman can do with a rape accusation.   
...

BB, why would you find it disturbing or twisted? 

You seem to be implying that something so implausible is almost surely a false accusation, is that true?

I think the woman's allegations are slightly unusual but certainly within the realm of possibility:

So the general and a female captain were having an affair that they subsequently broke off (for whatever reasons).  While they were broken up, the general in some way forced the captain to blow him.  Later, he made nice with her to the point where they resumed having genuinely consensual sex again.  It's plausible. 

Of course, what's also plausible is that the woman was seriously pissed at him for whatever reason and wanted to hurt him however she could.  She knew that since she was his subordinate, he'd get in big trouble in the military if the simple fact that they were having an affair became known (not to mention trouble at home between the general and his wife).  So, in order to let everyone know that they were having an affair while minimizing the amount of trouble she would get into herself when knowledge of the affair got out, she invented the oral rape story.

Either way, the general is an idiot.

And the story is nowhere near as interesting as that female astronaut stalker who wore a diaper so she didn't have to stop the car to pee during her long drive to kidnap her astronaut boyfriend's other girlfriend. ;D

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63956
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
BB, why would you find it disturbing or twisted? 

You seem to be implying that something so implausible is almost surely a false accusation, is that true?

I think the woman's allegations are slightly unusual but certainly within the realm of possibility:

So the general and a female captain were having an affair that they subsequently broke off (for whatever reasons).  While they were broken up, the general in some way forced the captain to blow him.  Later, he made nice with her to the point where they resumed having genuinely consensual sex again.  It's plausible. 

Of course, what's also plausible is that the woman was seriously pissed at him for whatever reason and wanted to hurt him however she could.  She knew that since she was his subordinate, he'd get in big trouble in the military if the simple fact that they were having an affair became known (not to mention trouble at home between the general and his wife).  So, in order to let everyone know that they were having an affair while minimizing the amount of trouble she would get into herself when knowledge of the affair got out, she invented the oral rape story.

Either way, the general is an idiot.

And the story is nowhere near as interesting as that female astronaut stalker who wore a diaper so she didn't have to stop the car to pee during her long drive to kidnap her astronaut boyfriend's other girlfriend. ;D

I doubt I could find a man in real life who doesn't find it twisted that a woman can have consensual sex both before and after a rape.  In fact, I've talked to several women about this and they all agree. 

blacken700

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11873
  • Getbig!
after the rape,there is something wrong with that ???

RRKore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2628
I doubt I could find a man in real life who doesn't find it twisted that a woman can have consensual sex both before and after a rape.  In fact, I've talked to several women about this and they all agree. 

BB, there's undoubtedly a lot of things that people think and do that seem inexplicable to you.  I'm not trying to be unkind (this time, haha).

After thinking more about it, I don't think the consensual sex before and after rape scenario is so uncommon, actually. 

Think about old-fashioned notions of a wife's marital responsibilities and the technical definition of rape;  A drunken husband who forces himself on his wife who isn't in the mood (who might also be drunk) but later makes it up to her would be an example of consensual sex before and after rape.  (Put this way, I wonder what these women you've spoken to would say.) Women today might be less willing to put up with this kind of thing but I'm very sure it still happens and think it probably happened a lot back when men being the sole breadwinners in the family was more common.

Not unlike some other conservatives, I think today's definition of rape might be what you're having a little bit of a problem with. 

Would you call it "rape" if, before getting some head, the general said  "I know we're broken up but if you don't blow me you can forget about that promotion."?

Not all rape is, as I think Whoopi Goldberg called it, "rape rape".  (You know, stranger-with-a-knife-at-the-victim's-throat-rape.)

RRKore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2628
after the rape,there is something wrong with that ???

I don't really think so.  Not if she had strong feelings for him at one time nor if he was exceptionally persuasive.

Guys frequently get their women to forgive them after beating the shit out of them. 

Why would it be much different after rape? 

Especially if it's not rape by physical force.

AbrahamG

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18259
  • Team Pfizer
I don't really think so.  Not if she had strong feelings for him at one time nor if he was exceptionally persuasive.

Guys frequently get their women to forgive them after beating the shit out of them. 

Why would it be much different after rape? 

Especially if it's not rape by physical force.

If he says he's sorry and eats her twat, I'm pretty sure that wipes the slate clean.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63956
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
BB, there's undoubtedly a lot of things that people think and do that seem inexplicable to you.  I'm not trying to be unkind (this time, haha).

After thinking more about it, I don't think the consensual sex before and after rape scenario is so uncommon, actually. 

Think about old-fashioned notions of a wife's marital responsibilities and the technical definition of rape;  A drunken husband who forces himself on his wife who isn't in the mood (who might also be drunk) but later makes it up to her would be an example of consensual sex before and after rape.  (Put this way, I wonder what these women you've spoken to would say.) Women today might be less willing to put up with this kind of thing but I'm very sure it still happens and think it probably happened a lot back when men being the sole breadwinners in the family was more common.

Not unlike some other conservatives, I think today's definition of rape might be what you're having a little bit of a problem with. 

Would you call it "rape" if, before getting some head, the general said  "I know we're broken up but if you don't blow me you can forget about that promotion."?

Not all rape is, as I think Whoopi Goldberg called it, "rape rape".  (You know, stranger-with-a-knife-at-the-victim's-throat-rape.)

Oh horse manure.  You find me one normal woman (guess that excludes you, or does it?) who says it's reasonable for a woman to have consensual sex with a man, repeatedly, both before and after she is raped by that same man, and then we'll talk. 

Granted, I've only talked to a few, but they are well traveled, educated, smart women.  Talked to a few men who had the same opinion.  Certainly doesn't pass the smell test. 

chadstallion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2854
He's kinda hot
w

RRKore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2628
Oh horse manure.  You find me one normal woman (guess that excludes you, or does it?) who says it's reasonable for a woman to have consensual sex with a man, repeatedly, both before and after she is raped by that same man, and then we'll talk. 

Granted, I've only talked to a few, but they are well traveled, educated, smart women.  Talked to a few men who had the same opinion.  Certainly doesn't pass the smell test. 

Deal. 

And I'm certainly not just a normal woman, lol.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63956
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Sex-Charge General to Admit Lesser Crimes
Wednesday, 05 Mar 2014

An Army general facing a rare court-martial of an officer of his high rank will plead guilty on Thursday to charges that he engaged in inappropriate relationships with several junior female soldiers, his defense lawyers said.
But Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair maintains he is innocent of the most serious charges against him, that he twice forced oral sex during an adulterous affair he admits to having with a captain assigned to his unit in Afghanistan.

Sinclair's attorneys announced his plans late Wednesday to plead guilty to a number of the criminal charges he faces. Opening statements in the trial at Fort Bragg, N.C., were due to begin on Thursday morning.

The 51-year-old married father of two will admit he committed adultery, a crime in the military, by having sex during a three-year affair with an unmarried captain 17 years his junior, the defense said.

He also exhibited conduct unbecoming an officer by eliciting nude photos from a female major, exchanging sexually explicit communications with another female captain and possessing pornography in Afghanistan, according to his lawyers.

Possession of pornography on deployment violates military law. The array of allegations led to the decorated general's removal from command in southern Afghanistan in 2012.

Sinclair's team said they will continue to fight charges that he sexually assaulted the captain with whom he admits to having an affair while in two war zones, in Germany and back home in the United States.

The general says he never used his superior rank to prevent the woman from ending their sexual relationship, nor did he threaten to kill her or her family if she exposed the affair. The defense has raised questions about the reliability of the key accuser's statements under oath.

Sinclair could be sentenced to life in prison if convicted of the sex charges. The crimes for which he will plead guilty typically result in fines and retirement at a reduced rank, his lawyers said.

Lead defense attorney Richard Scheff said Sinclair was taking responsibility for "shortcomings" that he had long acknowledged. He delayed pleading guilty to some of the lesser charges for tactical reasons, the attorney said.

"The government now has a big problem," said Scheff, a civilian lawyer. "The prosecution team no longer gets to distract us with salacious details about acts that aren't even criminal in the civilian world."

Asked for comment about the planned guilty pleas, a Fort Bragg spokesman said, "The government intends to allow the trial to take place in the courtroom."

The plea will have to be approved by the trial judge, Colonel James Pohl.

In court on Wednesday, prosecutors said their evidence included 8,500 pornographic images and 600 videos found on four devices used by Sinclair.

Pohl said military lawyers could not use the pornographic images to prove intent or motive by Sinclair on the separate sexual assault charges. A prosecutor said there were "stark similarities" between the images and sex crimes of which Sinclair is accused.

The judge on Tuesday denied a defense motion to dismiss the charges against Sinclair after a daylong hearing focused on whether top military leaders improperly influenced the case due to political pressure to crack down on sex crimes in the armed forces.

Sinclair's lawyers said the lead prosecutor who resigned just weeks before the trial wanted to abandon the sexual assault charges because of concerns about the key accuser's credibility. But military officers said the prosecutor, while grappling with severe emotional distress from personal issues as well as the case, did not doubt the underlying allegations.

Five two-star generals chosen as jurors will decide whether Sinclair is guilty of the remaining charges, which also include allegations that he misused his government credit card for personal purposes and referred to female staff officers using derogatory language.

The jurors, who all rank higher than Sinclair, a one-star general, traveled from several states and Korea to take part in the court-martial.

http://www.newsmax.com/US/Sinclair-admit-lesser-army/2014/03/05/id/556351#ixzz2vD1zkfbN

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63956
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Defense: Sex assault charges dropped in brigadier general's court-martial
By Marlena Baldacci and Eliott C. McLaughlin, CNN
Mon March 17, 2014

(CNN) -- Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair will plead guilty to adultery and mistreating his accuser in a deal that will see the sexual assault and sodomy charges against him dropped, according to his defense team and CNN affiliate WTVD.

Maj. Gen. Clarence Chinn, a commander at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, where the court-martial has been taking place, approved Sinclair's offer to plea this weekend, making it a binding document, according to a statement from the defense.

Defense attorney Richard Scheff applauded the decision while attacking the Pentagon, which the defense has accused of interfering in the case, and Sinclair's accuser, an Army captain the defense has painted as a jilted lover who was upset that the general wouldn't leave his wife.

"After wasting millions of taxpayer dollars, the Army finally admitted what it's known for many months: General Sinclair is innocent of sexual assault. Two successive prosecutors agreed that these charges should be dropped, as did two successive staff judge advocates," Scheff said in a statement.

He continued, "The government understood that if it allowed BG Sinclair's accuser to be cross-examined, she would be caught in a thick web of her own lies. It shouldn't have taken two years for them to come to this conclusion, but they were driven by politics rather than justice."
Scheff concluded his remarks, saying that the "reputational and financial costs" Sinclair has suffered because of "false rape allegations" should be factored into his sentencing.

The testimony of the general's accuser was never fully aired. She testified for several hours March 7, telling the court that the affair started with intimate exchanges and evolved into groping and demands for sex and oral sex, WTVD reported. She also said the general threatened to kill her and her family, the station reported.

She was scheduled to continue her testimony March 10, but Col. James Pohl, the presiding judge in the court-martial, dismissed the jury after 22 pages of e-mails emerged that appear to point to alleged Pentagon interference in the case. At least one of the e-mails also seemed to indicate that a senior Army official felt the accuser had a credibility issue.

While Pohl said there may have been "undue command influence" by Pentagon officials, he declined the defense team's request that he drop charges against Sinclair. Pohl instead ordered that the general be provided a possible plea deal.

Sinclair's attorneys filed a Freedom of Information Act request for all Pentagon e-mail communication including keywords in the Sinclair case, identifying about 10,000 e-mails among a dozen senior Pentagon officials, defense spokesman Josh Zeitz said.

The Pentagon was reviewing the communications and would likely release them slowly, Zeitz said Wednesday, but if the two sides reached a plea deal and something pivotal arose in those e-mails, the defense would file another motion to dismiss charges.

Zeitz said last week that Sinclair would not plead guilty to sexual assault, threatening the accuser or her family or any charge that would land him on a sex-offender registry.

The Sunday statement from the defense team said the plea deal nixed all three charges that would necessitate sex offender status for the general, as well as a charge of defrauding the government and a charge that alleged "Sinclair 'coerced and compelled' his accuser to remain in their three-year, consensual relationship."

The 27-year Army veteran will instead agree that his failure to end the relationship resulted in his accuser's emotional discomfort and distress, as did his refusal to divorce his wife and marry his accuser, the defense statement said. The general will also plead guilty to mistreating his accuser, which the defense team noted is "an infraction unique to the Uniform Code of Military Justice."

"We're left with a collection of lesser charges, most of which aren't criminal in the civilian world," Scheff said in his statement. "Sinclair has admitted to mistakes that are normally a matter between husbands and wives, or employees and HR departments. It's time to put this matter to rest."

Sentencing will begin this week. While it's unclear what penalty Sinclair faces, the government has agreed to a "quantum" -- essentially a maximum-penalty cap that won't be revealed to Pohl, according to the defense. Pohl will hand down his sentence, and Sinclair will face the lesser of the two sentences -- either Pohl's or those laid out in the quantum.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/16/justice/jeffrey-sinclair-court-martial-plea/

24KT

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24454
  • Gold Savings Account Rep +1 (310) 409-2244
I doubt I could find a man in real life who doesn't find it twisted that a woman can have consensual sex both before and after a rape.  In fact, I've talked to several women about this and they all agree. 

If you are programmed to obey... that's what you do. She was military, he was her superior officer.

There is nothing unusual to the fact that she had sex with him on occasions PRIOR TO the alleged rape.
The claim to have had sex with him afterwards is also not unusual. Its no different than a victim of domestic violence still sharing a home and a bed with a husband who has previously beaten her.

Then too, it could be like when you forget your wife's birthday. She may appear to let it go, ...and life goes on (on the surface) ...but if you piss her off, the resentment she's been harbouring under the surface rears it's head, and she'll throw it in your face, ...even if it's 5 years later, only then, she's not in the mood to overlook it.

The moral of this story:

Never mix your private parts with the payroll, especially if you're military. And never cheat on your spouse.
w

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
If you are programmed to obey... that's what you do. She was military, he was her superior officer.

There is nothing unusual to the fact that she had sex with him on occasions PRIOR TO the alleged rape.
The claim to have had sex with him afterwards is also not unusual. Its no different than a victim of domestic violence still sharing a home and a bed with a husband who has previously beaten her.

Then too, it could be like when you forget your wife's birthday. She may appear to let it go, ...and life goes on (on the surface) ...but if you piss her off, the resentment she's been harbouring under the surface rears it's head, and she'll throw it in your face, ...even if it's 5 years later, only then, she's not in the mood to overlook it.

The moral of this story:

Never mix your private parts with the payroll, especially if you're military. And never cheat on your spouse.
Programmed to obey.... please. Youve never been in the US military and you have zero clue.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63956
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
If you are programmed to obey... that's what you do. She was military, he was her superior officer.

There is nothing unusual to the fact that she had sex with him on occasions PRIOR TO the alleged rape.
The claim to have had sex with him afterwards is also not unusual. Its no different than a victim of domestic violence still sharing a home and a bed with a husband who has previously beaten her.

Then too, it could be like when you forget your wife's birthday. She may appear to let it go, ...and life goes on (on the surface) ...but if you piss her off, the resentment she's been harbouring under the surface rears it's head, and she'll throw it in your face, ...even if it's 5 years later, only then, she's not in the mood to overlook it.

The moral of this story:

Never mix your private parts with the payroll, especially if you're military. And never cheat on your spouse.

A woman having consensual sex with a rapist, both before and after being raped, is highly unusual. 

And nobody is programmed to obey.   ::)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63956
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Programmed to obey.... please. Youve never been in the US military and you have zero clue.

Tell me about it.