Author Topic: Vince Vaughn: ‘Banning Guns Is Like Banning Forks To Stop Making People Fat’  (Read 622 times)

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
I knew he was atleast a libertarian....but his argument is as succinct
as I've heard from anybody. 

http://thefederalist.com/2015/06/01/vince-vaughn-banning-guns-is-like-banning-forks-to-stop-making-people-fat/


In a new interview with GQ magazine that was published earlier today, actor Vince Vaughn went out of his way to offer unconditional support of the Second Amendment. The True Detective star said the Second Amendment isn’t about “duck hunting,” it’s about the right of individuals to “resist the supreme power of a corrupt and abusive government.”

Vaughn also added that there’s a reason so many mass shootings in the U.S. happen in so-called gun-free zones:

I support people having a gun in public full stop, not just in your home. We don’t have the right to bear arms because of burglars; we have the right to bear arms to resist the supreme power of a corrupt and abusive government. It’s not about duck hunting; it’s about the ability of the individual. It’s the same reason we have freedom of speech. It’s well known that the greatest defence against an intruder is the sound of a gun hammer being pulled back. All these gun shootings that have gone down in America since 1950, only one or maybe two have happened in non-gun-free zones. Take mass shootings. They’ve only happened in places that don’t allow guns. These people are sick in the head and are going to kill innocent people. They are looking to slaughter defenceless human beings. They do not want confrontation. In all of our schools it is illegal to have guns on campus, so again and again these guys go and shoot up these f***ing schools because they know there are no guns there. They are monsters killing six-year-olds.

How to stop monsters from waltzing into gun-free zones and shooting up innocent people? Easy, according to Vaughn: allow adults who work in schools to carry firearms. GQ specifically asked Vaughn if believed guns should be allowed in schools:

Of course. You think the politicians that run my country and your country don’t have guns in the schools their kids go to? They do. And we should be allowed the same rights. Banning guns is like banning forks in an attempt to stop making people fat. Taking away guns, taking away drugs, the booze, it won’t rid the world of criminality.

Recent polls show that most Americans agree with Vince Vaughn when it comes to gun rights and the Second Amendment. In a Pew Research poll that was released in December, 57 percent of adult respondents said guns “protect people from becoming crime victims,” compared to only 38 percent who said guns “put people’s safety at risk.”
L

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63977
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Banning guns is like banning forks in an attempt to stop making people fat. Taking away guns, taking away drugs, the booze, it won’t rid the world of criminality.



lol  :D  He's right. 

avxo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5605
  • Iron Pumping University Math Professor
I mostly agree with him.

Quote
How to stop monsters from waltzing into gun-free zones and shooting up innocent people? Easy, according to Vaughn: allow adults who work in schools to carry firearms.

Well, maybe not so easy. This doesn't stop the problem of monsters from shooting up innocent people. This only stops the problem of monsters waltzing into gun-free zones; admittedly this is a much easier problem to solve but, sadly, solving it doesn't help much. Because the real problem is how to stop crazy people from shooting up innocent people.

I don't think restrictions on firearms are the answer to this and I am not ok with blanket prohibitions on whole categories of firearms or on high-capacity magazines, but I am ok with allowing teachers who have taken basic firearms safety courses and have demonstrated basic proficiency with a pistol from being allowed to carry pistols with them. I am not ok with requiring a mountain of paperwork and a federal license to own an automatic weapon, but I am ok with imposing a waiting period on purchases of automatic weapons. I am reluctantly accepting of background checks for firearms, as much as the idea that there's a database out there someone could search to find out who owns what.

And I don't think that  "gun-free zones" can be completely eliminated either. For example, the idea of the general public having weapons on planes1 or courtrooms is disconcerting, if only slightly. Certainly though we should curtail such "gun-free" zones as much as possible.


1 Sadly, this is making the rounds today: TSA Failed 95 Percent of Breach Tests Letting Weapons, Fake Bombs Through. I both am and am not surprised. I don't expect the idiots staffing the checkpoints and abusing the flying public to do a good job. But I didn't expect them to be such abysmal failures.

ritch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10673
Pro gun people would like that one for sure.
But ya know, the fat person can always eat with a spoon if they wanted.
?